Finally a NOOORRRRAAA is sighted!!!!
Have no idea about the positives of this shameful act, so
now trolling to find out how to defend thy MASTER....
Shouldn't one think about both the positives and negatives before making up one's mind about an issue?
Why they did not hold election in last five years, why all of sudden all provinces are thinking about holding these elections. did they change constitution or new law
Shouldn't one think about both the positives and negatives before making up one's mind about an issue?
It is quite obvious that both PMLN and PPP did not want to hold local body elections otherwise they would have held these in the last 5 years. Now they have been forced to conduct these elections because Supreme Court has forced them to do so and has given them a dead-line to conduct these elections.
In order to conduct these elections, under SC instructions, all provincial governments are promulgating relevant laws. PMLN, Functional League etc seem to be supporting non-party based elections while MQM, PPP, PTI seem to be supporting party based elections for local bodies. The initial version of the new law put by PMLN before Punjab Assembly's committee seemed to be a mixture with street and mohallah level elections on non-party basis and elections for mayors on party basis.
Local bodies system is intended to solve day to day local problems of common man on a local level. Therefore, I think that before committing oneself as supporter of party based or non-party based local bodies elections, one should analyze what are the advantages and disadvantages of each.
This is called RATIONALIZATION....
Motive is too obvious,
they are afraid of some UNKNOWN party!!!!
Commenting before analyzing pros and cons of an issue is being irrational.
As for motives, one can never be sure but can only make a guess.
In the final analysis, local bodies system is for the benefit of common man. So not-withstanding ones guess work about other's motives, what really matters is whether the common man is going to benefit more by party based or non-party based elections. This should be the sole criterion for adopting one method over the other.
شیر ڈر کر بھاگ رہا ہے
[hilar][hilar][hilar]
Commenting before analyzing pros and cons of an issue is being irrational.
As for motives, one can never be sure but can only make a guess.
In the final analysis, local bodies system is for the benefit of common man. So not-withstanding ones guess work about other's motives, what really matters is whether the common man is going to benefit more by party based or non-party based elections. This should be the sole criterion for adopting one method over the other.
Will you be asking this question ifPTI tabled this proposal?????
We do not need to see everything with tinted glasses of party bias. It doesn't matter one bit if PTI or PMLN, Imran Kan or Nawaz Sharif score more political points.
What ultimately matters is how the lives of common Pakistanis can be made better. This is the criterion on which actions of all political parties should be judged.
Most Pakistanis would not care whether a step which can help in this regard is taken by PTI or PMLN.
The lifes of Pakistanis can be made better by submitting to USA completely.Would you agree to that.
We do not need to see everything with tinted glasses of party bias. It doesn't matter one bit if PTI or PMLN, Imran Kan or Nawaz Sharif score more political points.
What ultimately matters is how the lives of common Pakistanis can be made better. This is the criterion on which actions of all political parties should be judged.
Most Pakistanis would not care whether a step which can help in this regard is taken by PTI or PMLN.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|