Abhay ek to yeh bhi dhakan hai. In an ideal world yes of course IK should have gone. But a PM has to act and think like a state and not like an individual, because his actions can benefit or harm the state and all its people.
While Ganju only made personal relations with Saudis, Qataris, Turkey and India and always left behind the state of Pakistan.
If Khan only thought about his personal wah wah and brownie points he would score in the media I can bet you if MBS laid down at Khans feet also he would have still gone.
But because he put the State Of Pakistan and its citizens before his personal interests and jai jaikar he swallowed this bitter pill.
And to all the naysayers who are saying he chickened out, he made a U turn etc etc. Mofo's if Khan went for the summit. MBS ya Saudi ne Khan ka kya putt lena tha?
Khan ne kya 5 saal suroor palace mein rehna hai?
Khan ki kya Saudi mein factories hain jis pe MBS ne qabza ker lena tha?
Khan ne kya apni corruption bachane ke liye letter mangwana hai?
Khan ki apni zaat ko kya farak pardna tha agar who summit mein chala jata ?
Let me also say that all the chootiyas and phuddus who are criticizing Khan for not going would be same criticizing Khan the most if he went.
Why did he have to go? Doesn't he know what the country's situation is? Was it worth putting so many Pakistanis livelihood at stake just to attend the summit? Was it worth angering one of our biggest ally and biradar mulk just for one summit? Etc etc blah blah.
My answer copied from this thread