Remember Soybeans For F-16s, Mr. Panetta?

[Star Gazer]

haha.....good one......but then you don't have any valid arguments and have to resort to such comments........

back at you!

 

[desicad]

back at you!

as usual you are in angry mood.......:)

 

[atensari]

You decided to be an allie of NATO. Other countries are not asking money for their contributions, why are you? Getting money is the only motivation for Pakistan to be an allie. No money no ally.

Don't you remember it was a forced decision "with us or against us". All allies have their own interests and Pakistan has its own. No interest no Ally.

 

[desicad]

Don't you remember it was a forced decision "with us or against us". All allies have their own interests and Pakistan has its own. No interest no Ally.

yup it was forced.......once the intial threat of with us or against us was over pakistan could have slowly disengaged instead of staying in the marriage of convenience for this long, but then the money was good......

 

[Star Gazer]

as usual you are in angry mood.......:)

Whatever gave you that idea? :angry_smile:

 

[desicad]

Whatever gave you that idea? :angry_smile:

you mean what not whatever I guess.........

 

[Star Gazer]

you mean what not whatever I guess.........

Sorry, did not get what you were trying to say.

 

[desicad]

Sorry, did not get what you were trying to say.

you were asking me a question......whatever didn't fit in there.......

 

[Star Gazer]

you were asking me a question......whatever didn't fit in there.......

As usual,you are right.:P

 

[desicad]

As usual,you are right.:P

you are not wrong actually (post# 45).......for a change........(bigsmile)

 

[Star Gazer]

you are not wrong actually (bigsmile)

For once you are right! Finally you know how it feels to be right! Enjoy;)

 

[Unicorn]

Don't you remember it was a forced decision "with us or against us". All allies have their own interests and Pakistan has its own. No interest no Ally.

I would say it was a pressured decision. You are right on the interest part.

 

[atensari]

I would say it was a pressured decision. You are right on the interest part.

http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...and-do-what-we&p=864867&viewfull=1#post864867

 

[Unicorn]

http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...and-do-what-we&p=864867&viewfull=1#post864867

This article is about post withdraw after 2014. We were talking about pressure on Musharaf.

 

[atensari]

This article is about post withdraw after 2014. We were talking about pressure on Musharaf.

I am talking about pressure. Years and names changed but pressure did not.

 

[Unicorn]

I am talking about pressure. Years and names changed but pressure did not.

I would have to disagree with you. Who pressured Mr. Jinnah to go to US for money, no it wast not west. Who pressured Ayub Khan to join SETO and SENTO? It was not west. Who pressured Pakistan to allow NATO to use its airbase in Peshawar to spy on Soviet Union, it was not the west. It was the desire for money and weapons that drove Pakistan to do these things not pressure. The pressure only began during Musharf's time.

 

[atensari]

I would have to disagree with you. Who pressured Mr. Jinnah to go to US for money, no it wast not west. Who pressured Ayub Khan to join SETO and SENTO? It was not west. Who pressured Pakistan to allow NATO to use its airbase in Peshawar to spy on Soviet Union, it was not the west. It was the desire for money and weapons that drove Pakistan to do these things not pressure. The pressure only began during Musharf's time.

After partition did India gave Pakistan its due share of assets?

Did I said anything different?

 

[Unicorn]

After partition did India gave Pakistan its due share of assets?

Did I said anything different?

India withheld payment because Mr. Jinnah decided to attack Kashmir India did handed its agreed upon share to Pakistan.

You said " pressure was always there only names changed."

 

[atensari]

India withheld payment because Mr. Jinnah decided to attack Kashmir India did handed its agreed upon share to Pakistan.

You said " pressure was always there only names changed."

Really, did Indian sent army supplies with immigrants?
I did not said "always".

 

[only_truths]

Pak is a US ally and not Nato,and which countries are helping/supporting NATO with out a reward?
As per money thing, you should be thankful to PAKISTANIS they have learn a thing or two after spend a thousand years with you.

If you are not a NATO ally, why Gen. Kiyani go to Brussels ?

Could you please explain why we should be thankful to PAKISTANIS ? What did you do us to be proud of?