First squadron of pilotless planes inducted in Pak Navy

simple_and_peacefull

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
According to Pakistan Navy spokesman, UA Ways aircrafts are fully equipped with modern technology and sensors. The planes would be used in maritime operations in coastal areas.Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Salman Bashir was the chief guest. Addressing on this occasion, the Naval Chief said that UA Ways is considered to be an additional defence power. He said that Pakistan Navy’s operational efficiency would be enhanced after the inclusion of UA Ways.Source of news is: Duniya news Dated : 20/6/11
 

canadian

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
(bigsmile)(bigsmile)atleast india never inducted failed missiles until they worked 100% !!This drone looked too simple and such UAV are made in university !!

Wise words from someone who knows about everything that's going wrong in Pakistan.Looks like a psychiatric problem !!
 

pakiace

Banned
There was no sign of a drone crash in the oil refinery as per the Oil company workers statement

It was a reason they chose to build & tell the world - that you're not alone in making of drones! We're just besides you USA
 

virus

Senator (1k+ posts)
(clap)(clap)(clap)(clap)(clap)(clap)(clap)

chalo ak din inshallah manzil pay pahonc hi jaen gay
ur easay bahut say squadron navi airforce ur amy k pass hongay
 

Star Gazer

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
(bigsmile)(bigsmile)atleast india never inducted failed missiles until they worked 100% !!This drone looked too simple and such UAV are made in university !!

india is still smarting over the almost failed nuclear tests as aknowledged by their nuclear scientists.
 

A.Ali.T

Minister (2k+ posts)
(bigsmile)(bigsmile)atleast india never inducted failed missiles until they worked 100% !!This drone looked too simple and such UAV are made in university !!

براوو بھائی اگر کبھی موقع ملے تو تھامس ایڈیسن کی تاریخ پڑھ لینا - آپکو پتا چلےگا کہ وہ بلب بنانے میں کتنی دفع ناکام ہوا تھا - مرد وہ ہے جو گر کر ہر بار اٹھے اور منزل تک پنہچ کر دم لے - اگر آپ مرد ہو تو آپکو معلوم ہونا چاہیے -
 

aushami

MPA (400+ posts)
براوو بھائی اگر کبھی موقع ملے تو تھامس ایڈیسن کی تاریخ پڑھ لینا - آپکو پتا چلےگا کہ وہ بلب بنانے میں کتنی دفع ناکام ہوا تھا - مرد وہ ہے جو گر کر ہر بار اٹھے اور منزل تک پنہچ کر دم لے - اگر آپ مرد ہو تو آپکو معلوم ہونا چاہیے -

Write in English. He is indian. wont understand what you wrote.
 

Scorpion

Banned
(bigsmile)(bigsmile)atleast india never inducted failed missiles until they worked 100% !!This drone looked too simple and such UAV are made in university !!

Subject: Navy's patrol vessel sunk in a collision.
Jawan 4/23/2006 4:04:06 AM
Naval ship sinks off Goa coast

NT News Service

Vasco, April 22: Seventy-three naval crew members were rescued by the naval and Coast Guard rescue teams after a merchant ship collided with ?INS Prahar?, a naval patrol vessel about 20 nautical miles from Mormugao, west off the Goa coast, late last night.

The INS Prahar, a 450-tonne vessel has reportedly sunk in the Arabian Sea following a collision, according to the information given by the public relation officer (PRO), Goa naval area, Commandant Nilkanth Kesari.

?M V Rajiv Gandhi?, a container ship of Shipping Corporation of India collided with INS Prahar, at around 10 p.m, last night. All the survivors from the naval ship were rescued by a search and rescue team.

After the collision was reported, six naval and two Coast Guard vessels including a Dornier aircraft left Goa. Two naval helicopters and merchant vessels have been deployed for search and rescue operation from the Naval Air Station, INS Hansa.

When The Navhind Times contacted Commandant Kesari informed that the exact cause of the incident has not been ascertained and the Indian Navy has set up a board of inquiry to investigate into the matter.

INS Prahar was based in Mumbai and all the 73 survivors have been flown to Mumbai, Commandant Kesari informed. The damage to the merchant carrier was minimal and it has been anchored off the coast, naval sources informed.

Quote Reply



Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title Sort in Reverse Order Posted
Jawan RE:Navy's patrol vessel sunk in a collision. 4/26/2006 12:51:44 AM
New Delhi, April 25: The Indian navy today disclosed that its patrol vessel, INS Prahar, which sank off the Goa coast on Friday night following a collision with a container ship, was dragged by it for quite sometime after the two vessels got linked with each other. A navy official, preferring anonymity, told UNI that those, who were slapping charges of ?irresponsibility and carelessness? on the navy personnel, were not aware that the container ship, identified as MV Rajiv Gandhi, did not even bother to stop after the collision. ?After great difficulty, a navy officer managed to get on board the container ship even though it was a dark night, and asked its personnel to stop,? the official said. Strongly reacting to the allegations being heaped on the navy personnel, he said MV Rajiv Gandhi ?must not be given a clean chit? for this accident. Yet, navy officials are absolutely amazed as to how the entire patrol vessel sank. ?This appears to be a unique mishap in which the captain of the ship could not save it from sinking.? The official said there were 73 navy personnel on board the ship, and preliminary reports of the incident confirmed that they were brought back to the shore safe and in batches. ?This makes it clear as daylight that the crew members were engaged in saving the ship,? he pointed out. Likening the incident to a ?hit-and-run? case, it was like ?a heavy truck ramming into a bicycle because the patrol vessel, weighing mere 500 tonne, had collided with the container ship that weighed 21,000 tonne.? The official further said that it is universally known that personnel of a merchant ship go to sleep after putting the vessel on autopilot. ?But navy personnel are also aware of it, and they should have exercised greater caution. However, a mishap on the sea is not like a road accident wherein the captain of the ship coming from the opposite direction should go scot-free by saying that he did not have any other alternative.? He said if two vessels were engaged in a collision in the open seas, the onus for it lay on both of them. INS Prahar was returning to Mumbai from Goa after participating in a major naval exercise, when it collided with the container ship at 9.45 p.m. at a distance of 20 nautical miles from the coast. Six naval, two coast guard ships, passing merchant vessels, a Dornier aircraft and two naval helicopters were deployed for search and rescue in the area. The navy has ordered a high-level inquiry into the collision. Navy officials are angry that they have lost a Rs 200-crore ship, which was drafted into its fleet in 1997. But they are also heaving a sigh of relief that that the captain of the patrol vessel who was instrumental in saving all the 73 personnel on board.

Quote Reply



Jawan RE:Navy's patrol vessel sunk in a collision. 4/28/2006 3:33:36 AM
?Prahar bridge unmanned at time of collision? Probe: CO under scanner for dereliction of duty NEW DELHI, APRIL 26: Lt Cdr Yogesh Tripathi, the commanding officer of Naval missile corvette INS Prahar which sank off the Goa coast after a collision with SCI-owned merchant vessel Rajiv Gandhi last Friday, is under the scanner for indiscipline and dereliction of duty. Though investigations by the Board of Inquiry (BoI) ordered by Western Naval Command are still at a preliminary stage, it?s learnt there?s prima facie evidence that there may have been no command on the warship?s bridge at the time of the collision, implying gross violation of set rules. The inquiry into this alleged lapse comes just three months after another Naval officer, Commander Sunil David, was made to relinquish command of stealth frigate INS Trishul which collided with a merchant vessel Ambuja Laxmi outside the Mumbai harbour on December 27 last year. The inquiry into that incident is still not formally over. Officially, the Navy has said that only exhaustive investigations will allow the BoI to draw conclusions into the Prahar?s sinking, as detailed provisions of international rules of the road will need to be invoked to pin-point the cause. For now, the Navy has rejected the SCI?s unofficial opinion that the Naval ship did not follow navigational rules to avoid a collision in open sea. The Navy has also dismissed the idea that its navigational training needs to be revamped, and indicated that such incidents have happened with other Navies as well. Though all 73 personnel on board the warship were rescued, its sinking has caused concern in the Navy. Consider the following: ? The 56 m-long INS Prahar (Veer-class pennant number K98, 22 Sqn) was dragged for over 10 minutes by MV Rajiv Gandhi before the collision was even noticed by the personnel on board the warship. ? There was no recorded malfunction of the ship?s modified Russian Garpun BEL-E surface radar. This is principally why the BoI feels there was absence of command on the bridge. ? One of Prahar?s missile tubes (it is equipped with P-20s and Strela-2Ms) got stuck in the merchant vessel?s hull, which is why it was dragged. ? The merchant ship, moving at about 16 knots switched off its engines only after an officer from Prahar, who first noticed the collision, clambered onto the Rajiv Gandhi, proceeded to the ship?s bridge and informed them of what was happening below. ? Most officers and sailors on Prahar embarked the merchant vessel, while others got into lifeboats after which a search operation was initiated by six Naval vessels, two Coast Guard ships, passing merchant vessels, one Dornier-228 aircraft and two Chetak helicopters.



Should I have to make you remember the History of Indias Space Rocket launches when it crashed along with the million dollars satellite it was carrying . . . .

Your Navy has the achievements where it sank own ship inside the Harbor . . . .

Just see your record before talking big . . . . .

April 21, 2006
INS Prahar lost at sea after collision with a containership. Three inquiries ordered.
INS Prahar and MVRajiv Gandhi collided around 9.30 p.m. on April 21

February 22, '06
Five sailors die in a fire on board INS Magar off Vizagwhile disposing of ordnance.

December 2005
INS Trishul's captain admits his fault after it collideswith a merchant ship.

March 2004
Corvette INS Agray written off after anti-submarine rocketexplodes near it.

November 1999
Fleet tanker INS Jyoti collides with a merchant vessel inthe Bay of Bengal.

August 1990
INS Andaman sinks in the Bay of Bengal with 15 crewmen afterdeveloping a leak.
INS Prahar and MVRajiv Gandhi collided around 9.30 p.m. on April 21

And include the latest of what happened inside the Bombay Port . . . .
 

bravo

Banned
Should I have to make you remember the History of Indias Space Rocket launches when it crashed along with the million dollars satellite it was carrying . . . .


all country fail satellite launches..even usa,russia,china failed their launch a year ago..Well in case of china :no media can reveal their failures..but they do it only once the launch kills hundreds people ...in india all launches of space programme,defense missiles are accounted live on ddnews !!
Your Navy has the achievements where it sank own ship inside the Harbor . . . .

Just see your record before talking big . . . . .
April 21, 2006
INS Prahar lost at sea after collision with a containership. Three inquiries ordered.
INS Prahar and MVRajiv Gandhi collided around 9.30 p.m. on April 21

February 22, '06
Five sailors die in a fire on board INS Magar off Vizagwhile disposing of ordnance.

December 2005
INS Trishul's captain admits his fault after it collideswith a merchant ship.

March 2004
Corvette INS Agray written off after anti-submarine rocketexplodes near it.

November 1999
Fleet tanker INS Jyoti collides with a merchant vessel inthe Bay of Bengal.

August 1990
INS Andaman sinks in the Bay of Bengal with 15 crewmen afterdeveloping a leak.
INS Prahar and MVRajiv Gandhi collided around 9.30 p.m. on April 21

And include the latest of what happened inside the Bombay Port . . . .

They are minor issues...in pakistan not even a single source of failure is highlighted.all your missiles pass tests :)...Pakistan is ahead of usa,russia,europe in missile technology :)

Your country cant make a bike,car..i wont ask about space programmes which are only achieved by nations which have indigenous research and development;whose missiles are not bought (the way nodong,m9/m11 were bought from korea,china );who design,implement,test,verify and fix their problems indigenously !!