Stealth technology, How does stealth technology work? Possible to detect Stealth fighters??? Where d

PkRevolution

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

China's first stealth flight test: Jan.2011


The emergence of stealth technology in air superiority fighters fundamentally changes the basic rules of the game.

Stealth technology also termed LO technology (low observable technology) is a sub-discipline of military tactics and passive electronic countermeasures, which cover a range of techniques used with personnel, aircraft, ships, submarines, and missiles, to make them less visible (ideally invisible) to radar, infrared, sonar and other detection methods.

Stealth changes the tactical environment in fundamental ways. The first result of stealth is that the opponent cannot see the stealthy fighter on radar, or detect its radar on a warning receiver. Therefore, the stealthy fighter can locate, identify and stalk its opponent without being detected. A stealthy fighter can therefore exploit von Richtoven's fundamental axiom, approach its victim undetected and shoot from six o'clock before the opposing fighter even knows it is there.
************************

The idea is for the radar antenna to send out a burst of radio energy, which is then reflected back by any object it happens to encounter. The radar antenna measures the time it takes for the reflection to arrive, and with that information can tell how far away the object is.

The metal body of an airplane is very good at reflecting radar signals, and this makes it easy to find and track airplanes with radar equipment.

The goal of stealth technology is to make an airplane invisible to radar. There are two different ways to create invisibility:
The airplane can be shaped so that any radar signals it reflects are reflected away from the radar equipment.

The airplane can be covered in materials that absorb radar signals.
Most conventional aircraft have a rounded shape. This shape makes them aerodynamic, but it also creates a very efficient radar reflector. The round shape means that no matter where the radar signal hits the plane, some of the signal gets reflected back:

stealth-1a.jpg


A stealth aircraft, on the other hand, is made up of completely flat surfaces and very sharp edges. When a radar signal hits a stealth plane, the signal reflects away at an angle, like this:

stealth2.gif


F117-Stealth.jpg


In addition, surfaces on a stealth aircraft can be treated so they absorb radar energy as well. The overall result is that a stealth aircraft like an F-117A can have the radar signature of a small bird rather than an airplane. The only exception is when the plane banks -- there will often be a moment when one of the panels of the plane will perfectly reflect a burst of radar energy back to the antenna.

Full-size stealth combat aircraft demonstrators have been flown by the United States (in 1977), Russia (in 2010) and China (in 2011),[8] while the US Military has already adopted three stealth designs, and is preparing to adopt another.

Some news topics:

http://www.flightglobal.com/article...era-e-radar-export-order-to-china-halted.html

2004: Is the Czech the only country that have this Anti-Sealth Radar?

Czech Govt halted the export of these radars to China.China ordered 6 pieces worth $ 57 mil.

The Australian system works on a top down detection process. Officially it's range is circa 3500km's. Unofficially it's been reported that it was able to detect aircraft movements as far as Hong Kong, and intermittently it was usggested that it detected F-117's out of Bagdhad.

During vietnam war, US AC-130 Gunships had sensors to pick up spark plug signals in North Vietnamese supply trucks. This technique was used because most of the vehicles were driven under thick jungle umbrella hence difficult if not impossible to see visually.
 
Last edited:

biomat

Minister (2k+ posts)
Hear what experienced pilot & airforce VCHIEF is saying about stealth detection by our radars..
Air Marshal Shahid Lateef was commissioned in the General Duties (Pilot) Branch on April 7, 1974. He earned the coveted Sword of Honour on graduation from the PAF Academy, Risalpur. He has served as a fighter pilot in various squadrons of the PAF and was among the pioneers of F-16 induction programme in the PAF. He was also deputed in the Abu Dhabi Air Force. During his career, he has commanded a fighter squadron, a fighter wing and an operational air base. He has held various key staff appointments at the Air Headquarters including the JF-17 Project. He has been associated with the development and production programme of JF-17 Thunder aircraft for nearly eight years, initially as deputy chief project director and then as chief project director for five years. In his last assignment, he was serving as Deputy Chief of the Air Staff (Operations) since April, 2006.
 

karachiwala

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
VAC (R) Shahid Latif is shown as a Defense Analyst and I think this person is worth being called a defense analyst . So when we hear someone being called a defense analyst lets just look at the credentials of that person not every Tom Dick and harry can be called a defense analyst. You must have something to back you!
 

rana14801

Senator (1k+ posts)
Air martial Shahid Lateef is describinh a situation where high altitude detection radar work for those who r flying high.he probably did not had the consideration in mind that not only stealth technalogy was used but dead zones in hilly areas were used where our radar coverage is not available rather no country can have 100 % radar coverage in area like this except USA type countries who can afford to spend millions on this type of projects but still cannot cover it completely. secondly we were not expecting this type of hostile move from a so called friendly country. our economy cannot afford that expenditures.so second factor of using dead radar zone is the main reason for not detacting these helicopters and ofcourse if there was some space where they passed as observed for few seconds,the stealth technology worked or helped them to stay as undetected.i m also an ex dfence officer and in my opinion these factors r there. may be some brother seconds me or show his better opinion.i shall welcome him if he is expert on this matter.
 

jahanzaibi

Senator (1k+ posts)
likin wo 2 helicopter jo kala dhaka kay khait may peeshab kar rahay thay aur wo loog jo movie bana rahay that abbotabad may aur 45 min kay operation may
kakool kay toochay soo rahay thay yaar baat kuch aur hay.. army janti thi ya hoo ga likin kion support kia ya aik alag baat hay aur koi nai baat bhi nahi
 

biomat

Minister (2k+ posts)
Brother i think our engineers are same capable as any other country. We just need vision & self reliance.
UK have successfully used GSM MOBILE TOWERS as radars with pin point accuracy with minimal to none expenses.
WHY NOT OUR COUNTRY CAN DO THAT.. I know most of the GSM COMPANIES (Mobile companies) are foreign companies so they will not share their system under the control of military..
So there are always alternated to counter stealth technologies. Yes one brother is right that our forces never considered afghanistan border for air incursions. But there are many flaws in that EXCERCISE & some explaining that if PAKISTAN would have responded it will be full war.
But counter question is for how many days we can tolerate as they will increase there incursions from drones to stealth helis, then boots on ground & many more..
There is limit to every thing..