code_decode
Senator (1k+ posts)
Gaddar Najam Sethi using Pakistan media to promote Indian agenda...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCIuOICxKJY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCIuOICxKJY
Traitor Najam Sethi Pakistani media ko Indian propoganda promote kurnay kay lie use kur ruha hai...
code_decode
Senator (1k+ posts)
code_decode
Senator (1k+ posts)
sala ...india ka agent...
code_decode
Senator (1k+ posts)
haram zada... **** ka bucha....
lastbullet
Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
Re: Gaddar Najam Sethi using Pakistan media to promote Indian agenda...
so whats wrong in that this is the truth .
so whats wrong in that this is the truth .
Re: Gaddar Najam Sethi using Pakistan media to promote Indian agenda...
Truth is bitter. Suppose if everything he said is wrong, we were right on every ocassion and we won every war and we have been doing everything right then why we are in this sh*t state now. First step is accept realities, find solutions and third implementation. we have not even reached the first stage. Look at that crasy posts and bias comments on sensitive issues like army, nationality and religion. Why have become like that?
Truth is bitter. Suppose if everything he said is wrong, we were right on every ocassion and we won every war and we have been doing everything right then why we are in this sh*t state now. First step is accept realities, find solutions and third implementation. we have not even reached the first stage. Look at that crasy posts and bias comments on sensitive issues like army, nationality and religion. Why have become like that?
Please don't be sentimental. He is telling the truth. All 4 wars were started by Pakistan. I also read in social studies that : in the dark night of September, india started the war with us in 1965. When i grew up and did research, i found Pakistan started a conflict in Kashmir and india responded with full blown war. Here is the history:
Indo-Pakistani War of 1947: This is also called the First Kashmir War. The war started in October 1947 when the Maharajah of the princely state of Kashmir and Jammu was pressured to accede to either of the newly independent states of Pakistan or India. Tribal forces prompted by Pakistan attacked and occupied the princely state, forcing the Maharajah to sign the "Agreement to the accession of the princely state to India". The United Nations was then invited by India to mediate the quarrel. The UN mission insisted that the opinion of the Kashmiris must be ascertained. The UN Security Council passed Resolution 47 on 21 April 1948. The war ended in December 1948 with the Line of Control dividing Kashmir into territories administered by Pakistan (northern and western areas) and India (southern, central and northeastern areas).
Indo-Pakistani War of 1947: This is also called the First Kashmir War. The war started in October 1947 when the Maharajah of the princely state of Kashmir and Jammu was pressured to accede to either of the newly independent states of Pakistan or India. Tribal forces prompted by Pakistan attacked and occupied the princely state, forcing the Maharajah to sign the "Agreement to the accession of the princely state to India". The United Nations was then invited by India to mediate the quarrel. The UN mission insisted that the opinion of the Kashmiris must be ascertained. The UN Security Council passed Resolution 47 on 21 April 1948. The war ended in December 1948 with the Line of Control dividing Kashmir into territories administered by Pakistan (northern and western areas) and India (southern, central and northeastern areas).
- Indo-Pakistani War of 1965: This war started following of Pakistan's Operation Gibraltar, which was designed to infiltrate forces into Jammu and Kashmir to precipitate an insurgency against rule by India. India retaliated by launching an attack on Pakistan. The five-week war caused thousands of casualties on both sides and was witness to the largest tank battle in military history since World War II. It ended in a United Nations (UN) mandated ceasefire and the subsequent issuance of the Tashkent Declaration.
- Indo-Pakistani War of 1971: The war was unique in that it did not involve the issue of Kashmir, but was rather precipitated by the crisis brewing in erstwhile East Pakistan. Following Operation Searchlight and the 1971 Bangladesh atrocities, about 10 million Bengalis in East Pakistan took refuge in neighboring India.[SUP][6][/SUP] Because of the impending humanitarian crisis , India intervened in the ongoing Bangladesh liberation movement. After a failed pre-emptive strike by Pakistan, full-scale hostilities between the two countries commenced. Within two weeks of intense fighting, Pakistani forces surrendered to India following which the People's Republic of Bangladesh was created.[SUP][7][/SUP] This war saw the highest number of casualties in any of the India-Pakistan conflicts, as well as the largest number of prisoners of war since the Second World War after the surrender of nearly 90,000 Pakistani military and civilians.
- Indo-Pakistani War of 1999: Commonly known as Kargil War, this conflict between the two countries was mostly limited. Pakistani troops along with Kashmiri insurgents infiltrated across the Line of Control (LoC) and occupied Indian territory mostly in the Kargil district. Pakistani government believed that its nuclear weapons would deter a full-scale escalation in conflict but India launched a major military campaign to flush out the infiltrators.[SUP][8][/SUP] Due to Indian military advances and increasing foreign diplomatic pressure, Pakistan was forced to withdraw its forces back across the LoC.[SUP][9][/SUP]
sirajfareed
Citizen
read this interesting post about najam sethi: http://karachitargetkilling.wordpress.com/s/
only_truths
Minister (2k+ posts)
I do not care who started and who finished in the past. But in future I wish no more wars. Enough is enough. Let us live in peace even if we don't talk to each other. India has forgotten partition of 1947 and it's painful memory. I wish the current generation of Pakistan understand this and move ahead.
The reason Pak is in this current mess is that Pakis have a tough time digesting the true history of our country. The "Zahil Himid generation", which has been brainwashed, will always live in denial and any truth spoken is termed as lies and the messenger proclaimed as an Indian/RAW agent -- no matter how educated, honest, respected and wise the individual delivering the message is. That this generation is so intolerant is evident from the fact that any disagreement in opinion leads to labels like "RAW agent", traitor, etc. Can anyone deny that Pak is a failed state and Karachi is burning? Years from now, our current situation in Karachi will be revised by Zahil Hamids of the world as a creation of the usual -- RAW, CIA, and Moussad. Let's be rational and not live in a world of fantasy, where Pakis have always been saints, our leadership perfect, RAW/India/CIA always the villain no matter what. Let's try to extinguish the fires and learn from our past.
Muhammad Ilyas Khan
Siasat.pk - Blogger
The biggest stupidty in a post is presenting half-truths. This post is presented in that biased way where Najam Sethi's says just a few words and thus the poster presents this totally out of context. This is a very unethical way of presenting an analyst as a traitor. Intelligent and educated people who are interested in TRUTH SEEKING will simply dismiss such posts as distortions of reality.
shaheedchoudry
Minister (2k+ posts)
Yes...........shukar hai aap nay kaha in Pakistan. Waisay es sey bhi aik bharra hai woh Aaj kal Pakistan main nahi hota.
jennyrock42
MPA (400+ posts)
You are an indian guy, I caught you because you have spelled "Zaid Hamid" as "Zahil Hameed" and I have noticed that on youtube all indian commentators do the same, shame on you for pretending yourself as a pakistani
bhasin_parveen
MPA (400+ posts)
why sala you do not like the reality go and join zaid hamid
Shame on you to accuse me of being an Indian without knowing any facts. Indians don't have a trademark on Zahil Hamid. I am going to call a hate-monger Zahil.
