WatanDost
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Re: Watch live Javed Ahmed Ghamdi
جناب ایک ہی خمیر سے مرکب بدروحیں ہیں
بس
لیبل / ٹیگ جدا جدا
جیسی دکان ویسا نام
بس
لیبل / ٹیگ جدا جدا
جیسی دکان ویسا نام
Javed Ahmad Ghamdi Threads - Collection
karachiwala
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Re: Watch live Javed Ahmed Ghamdi
hazrat Mu'tazila ki baqiyaat mein se haen.
hazrat Mu'tazila ki baqiyaat mein se haen.
Jagajaga
Citizen
Re: Watch live Javed Ahmed Ghamdi
Thanks for sharing. A good intellectually islamic personality. I don't agree with all of his thoughts but he has intersting logics to claer his point. We should give space for the freedom of speech. It will help us to learn each ohter. Well, only Allah knows, who's on right.
Thanks for sharing. A good intellectually islamic personality. I don't agree with all of his thoughts but he has intersting logics to claer his point. We should give space for the freedom of speech. It will help us to learn each ohter. Well, only Allah knows, who's on right.
indigo
Siasat.pk - Blogger
Re: حقییقی تبدیلی کا راستہ
Javed Ahmad Ghamidi speech in Adelaide.
http://www.javedahmadghamidi.com/in...roles-responsibilities-of-muslims-in-the-west
Javed Ahmad Ghamidi speech in Adelaide.
http://www.javedahmadghamidi.com/in...roles-responsibilities-of-muslims-in-the-west
Last edited:
Freedomlover
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: علم کی دنیا جذبات کی دنیا نہیں ہوتی
Ilam se faida hasil karnay ke liay jazba ke zaroorat hoti hi aur jiss mi jazba no ho wo murda hota hi
Ilam se faida hasil karnay ke liay jazba ke zaroorat hoti hi aur jiss mi jazba no ho wo murda hota hi
Mojo-jojo
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: علم کی دنیا جذبات کی دنیا نہیں ہوتی
اردو میں جذبہ ہونے کا اور جذباتیت دونوں کا مطلب اور مفہوم مختلف ہے
جذبہ ہونے کا مطلب ہے کسی کام یا مقصد کیلئے شوق اور دل کی آمادگی سے راضی ہونا اور کوشش کرنے کیلئے تیار ہونا
جبکہ جذباتیت سے مراد اس موقع پر یہ ہے کہ بغیر سوچے سمجھے اور محض جذبات کی رو میں بہہ کر کسی معاملے میں اپنی رائے یا ردعمل کا اظہار کرنا
امید ہے آپ میری بات کا برا محسوس نہیں کریں گے
اردو میں جذبہ ہونے کا اور جذباتیت دونوں کا مطلب اور مفہوم مختلف ہے
جذبہ ہونے کا مطلب ہے کسی کام یا مقصد کیلئے شوق اور دل کی آمادگی سے راضی ہونا اور کوشش کرنے کیلئے تیار ہونا
جبکہ جذباتیت سے مراد اس موقع پر یہ ہے کہ بغیر سوچے سمجھے اور محض جذبات کی رو میں بہہ کر کسی معاملے میں اپنی رائے یا ردعمل کا اظہار کرنا
امید ہے آپ میری بات کا برا محسوس نہیں کریں گے
Freedomlover
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: علم کی دنیا جذبات کی دنیا نہیں ہوتی
Aap ne jazbat ko bewaqoof ka mafhoom pehnaya hi. kia aap ne mashahoor leadero ke taqreerain dekhi hin jazbaat ke through hi leaders change laty hin. murda awaz walay chudhry metti pao type leaders koi change nahi laa saktay
Aap ne jazbat ko bewaqoof ka mafhoom pehnaya hi. kia aap ne mashahoor leadero ke taqreerain dekhi hin jazbaat ke through hi leaders change laty hin. murda awaz walay chudhry metti pao type leaders koi change nahi laa saktay
Re: علم کی دنیا جذبات کی دنیا نہیں ہوتی
jazbaat wohee qaable qadr hen to aqlo fikr ke teht hun. aur aqalo fikr wohee drust hai jis ki bunyaad mustaqam ho.
yeh mustaqam bunyaad kia cheez hai? mustaqm bunyaad sirf aur sirf woh hoti hai jo paayae saboot ko pohnche.
aap kisi amaarat ko us waqt tak kaamil nahin maan sakte jab tak ke woh kaamil na ho. saboot isi ko kehte hen yani kisi baat ka apne maqsad ke liye mukammal hona. sahee aur saalam bhi isi ko kehte hen. isi liye jo baat yaa cheez poori yaa mukamal na ho us ko naaqis kehte hen.
quran khudaa ki mukammal kitaab hai, sirf is liye nahin keh is main quran ki tamaam ayaat mojood hen balkeh is liye ke is main is ke khudaa ka kalaam hone ka saboot bhi mojood hai jo is ke daawe par daleel hai jo is ke maqsad ko poora karta hai.
doosre lafzun main kisi bhi cheeze yaa baat ke jitne bhi hisse hen un sab ko aapas main sahee tareeqe se jod kar pesh karne ko saboot kehte hen. yahee kaam hamaare molvi nahin kar sakte aur issi liye un ki baatun main beshumaar tazadaat paaye jaate hen jo un ki baatun ko jhoota aur man gharat saabit karte hen.
yahee wajah hai aaj poori ummat sakht intshaar ka shikaar hai kyunkeh log aise molavyun ke peechhe chal nikle hen jin ko quran se aisa waasta nahin hai jo hona chahiye.
Quran alone is base of deen of islam, not quran & hadis or quran & sunnah, why not?
To under that one needs to understand that from my point of view I like to explain things in a bit of detail because my point of view is not widely known already as other points of views. It is easier for people to talk to each other when they already know where they are coming from but a bit difficult when it comes to discussion between not well known points of views. This is why if I only stated some facts and did not explain them then one will not know what I am trying to say and why, this is why some detail becomes absolutely necessary or one will never know what I am trying to explain or why.
Let me make it absolutely clear that I do not reject any source of information about deen of islam at all. What I reject is the idea that all sources are equal with the quraan. That I cannot accept unless someone can clearly prove that that is the case beyond any reasonable doubt which no one has done so far in my life time. Looking at something clearly visible through smeared glasses is not going to let us see the thing clearly likewise looking at clear message of God through problematic hadis reports is not going to help us understand the quran properly. Moreover each thing has its own place value just like numbers in maths. One cannot just say a number but needs to have a context otherwise the number will not make any sense. Words likewise only make sense when they have contexts or a purposes to serve.
The reason I take the quran to be the only foundation of deen of islam is because it was God who created this world according to his plan for his purpose alone. This is why it was he who wanted to reveal his plan and purpose for mankind therefore he decided to send his messages for mankind. For this reason he devised a communication channel or chain through which he communicated his message for mankind. The revelation chain is not an exception rather like any other set up of this universe for various other purposes it is just another set up to serve a particular purpose eg one can look at ecosystem or solar system or rain cycle etc etc. The communication chain includes God and his missionaries ie people who work for him.
This explanation should make it very clear that communication channel and message of God are two different things. Purpose of communication channel is to act as medium for transmission of message of God and purpose of message of God is to guide mankind regarding matters which God thought were important for mankind to know so that mankind could fulfil his purpose for their part in his scheme of things. So everything revolves around plan and purpose of God for which he created this universe and people in it. Had God no purpose for creating this universe and people in it with ability of limited freedom of choice then he needed no plan nor did he need to create this universe. So making proper sense of his purpose and his plan is a basic necessity for understanding deen of islam because that is the reason he told mankind a way of life whereby they could fulfil his purpose according to his plan.
As for message of God once it reaches people through people it is up to people to accept it or reject it with their own understanding of it as they see fit for themselves. This message needs prior understanding of things before people could understand it. If it is given to people who lack in needed knowledge then they will not know what to do with it and the best example for that is human babies. Anything you give to a human baby he puts it in his mouth taking it as his feed. The only people who can understand the message in the quran is those who are literate themselves and have good knowledge of things the quran is talking about or those to whom the quran is recited and explained by others and they become sensible enough to make proper sense of things. The rest are as good as living dead.
This should explain why I say the quran should be understood in light of real world realities because that is what the quran is actually about ie it is a teaching for mankind as to how to live properly in this world. If I say to a baby make me a cup of tea. The baby will not know what I am talking about because baby has not yet learned words or relationship of words with things in the real world. He can repeat my words if he can talk but cannot carry out my request. This will remain the situation till baby grows enough and has sufficient life experience to come to know what my request meant for him. Only and only then he will be able to carry out my request. The quran is not any different when it comes to learning it for its proper understanding. Only those people come to understand it properly who have learned the way to understand it properly and they have learned the needed information and have the needed life experience. So all people who claim to know the quran if they are questioned about it, a huge majority of them will be dumbfounded.
The real point here is, it is God who wanted to send his message for mankind because he had to tell something to mankind and not messenger of God because messenger of God did not create people for his purpose according to his plan. The part messenger of God played in this scheme is, message bearer, ie just to pass on God's message to people after understanding it himself ie before he could do that he had to make sense of the message of God for himself according to his time and available human knowledge because he too had to act upon it and the message told him to deliver it to others and that is why he delivered it to others or taught it to others to the best of his God given abilities. We need to remember that God passed on his message to his messenger for himself and others not just for himself nor just for others.
By giving the wrong job description of messenger we are turning him into a God instead of God's messenger. The messenger was supposed to deliver message of God as it was ie as he received it from God, without adding anything to it or taking away anything from it. This is why the quran tells us he did not speak anything as quran other than the quran itself. It does not mean whatever he said or did was always revelations of God. It is because messengers of God made odd mistakes that is why their those stories are also told in the quran to ensure people do not take them for other than human beings. When a person himself makes mistakes how can he create a message like that of God's message by himself? It is because messengers of God are also human beings they too are prone to making mistakes called human errors but God draws their attention to their errors in some way and they correct them. However no messenger of God ever does anything wrong deliberately or intentionally.
The mistake people make in trying to understand this issue is that they do not separate the communication chain from the message the chain is supposed to deliver for which the communication chain is set up by God who made sure it worked for his purpose according to his plan and it does and that is why we have the quran today so many centuries after the final messenger of God has gone from this world. This is why the actual framework or structure of deen of islam has to come from the quran alone not from mixed sources particularly when those sources are prone to mistakes and errors beyond corrections. During the revelation of the quraan any mistake made by the messenger of God was corrected by God but after the stopping of the revelation when people started attributing things to him there was no revelation from God any more for correcting people. This is why whatever people attributed to God or his messenger was no longer as reliable as whatever was left behind by the messenger of God as the quran. This is why distinguishing between revelation of God and reports by people becomes inevitable.
The fact is, messengers of God have been making mistakes and that is what the quran itself tells us. For this reason God could not tell us to follow them unconditionally or blindly that is why whenever God tells us to follow his messenger it means in things which he did according to the quran to fulfil his God given mission and not absolutely in each and everything he said or did. To follow anyone absolutely is naturally impossible because one can never know each and everything about anyone even on daily basis or we ought to have moment to moment diaries of messenger of God not hadis books. Moreover look at human attention span. How many people can remain fully alert and aware or attentive during a whole 24 hour day? People get tired after a while and that is why people go to sleep or rest to recoup their energy. Even when we are fully attentive we cannot pay attention to everything that is happening all around us. If we look at one things in front of us there is another thing going on behind us. We can only focus on one thing at a time. This is why when a magician makes us look at one thing in one of his hands he does something else with his other hand to which we are not paying attention in order to trick us. So due to such natural limitations how much can we know about anyone at all including our own very selves?
So people who tell us we know each and everything about the messenger of God are not realising what they are saying or claiming about messenger of God otherwise they could never claim what they claim about messenger of God. Moreover there are things which messengers of Allah said and did as reported in hadis books which if we said and did we will become kaafir therefore it is wrong to say we must follow messenger of God absolutely and unconditionally without any limits or qualifications. So I do not see what is so difficult there to understand if people have learned the knowledge they need to, to make proper sense of the message in the quran? If they have not learned the needed knowledge to understand the message in the quran properly then they cannot understand any explanation no matter how detailed it is. It is because we human beings are born not knowing a thing and it takes us ages to grow up by learning things bit by bit on daily basis. This is the real extent of explanation that is required for a human being to start making proper sense of things.
Moreover how can one use a secondary source to interpret the main source if secondary source itself depends upon main source for its qualification or authenticity? This is why the quran alone has to be the foundation of deen of islam. However once we have derived the structure or framework of deen of islam from the quran alone in light of real world realities thereafter we can use all other sources to fill in details where need be that is consistent with the framework of deen of islam as derived from the quran alone just like bits of jig saw puzzle. I am saying real world realities because the quran is all about how people ought to live in the real world. Deen of islam is nothing other than a way of life advised by Allah for mankind to live in this world properly to fulfil his purpose of creating them according to his given plan or roadmap or program.
Furthermore mullahs have misinterpreted the quran by telling us it is a complete code of life instead of telling us we need to extract framework of deen of islam from the quran to form a complete code of life to live by. The quran does not give us a fully worked out constitution and laws for organising human society and regulating it. This is why we do not have ummah as the final messenger of God left behind after its formation on basis of the quran alone. As I see it unless people go back to the quran alone as foundation of deen of islam there is not going to be any ummah in the future either as it has not been over the so many past centuries.For a detailed explanation of things see HERE and HERE.
jazbaat wohee qaable qadr hen to aqlo fikr ke teht hun. aur aqalo fikr wohee drust hai jis ki bunyaad mustaqam ho.
yeh mustaqam bunyaad kia cheez hai? mustaqm bunyaad sirf aur sirf woh hoti hai jo paayae saboot ko pohnche.
aap kisi amaarat ko us waqt tak kaamil nahin maan sakte jab tak ke woh kaamil na ho. saboot isi ko kehte hen yani kisi baat ka apne maqsad ke liye mukammal hona. sahee aur saalam bhi isi ko kehte hen. isi liye jo baat yaa cheez poori yaa mukamal na ho us ko naaqis kehte hen.
quran khudaa ki mukammal kitaab hai, sirf is liye nahin keh is main quran ki tamaam ayaat mojood hen balkeh is liye ke is main is ke khudaa ka kalaam hone ka saboot bhi mojood hai jo is ke daawe par daleel hai jo is ke maqsad ko poora karta hai.
doosre lafzun main kisi bhi cheeze yaa baat ke jitne bhi hisse hen un sab ko aapas main sahee tareeqe se jod kar pesh karne ko saboot kehte hen. yahee kaam hamaare molvi nahin kar sakte aur issi liye un ki baatun main beshumaar tazadaat paaye jaate hen jo un ki baatun ko jhoota aur man gharat saabit karte hen.
yahee wajah hai aaj poori ummat sakht intshaar ka shikaar hai kyunkeh log aise molavyun ke peechhe chal nikle hen jin ko quran se aisa waasta nahin hai jo hona chahiye.
Quran alone is base of deen of islam, not quran & hadis or quran & sunnah, why not?
To under that one needs to understand that from my point of view I like to explain things in a bit of detail because my point of view is not widely known already as other points of views. It is easier for people to talk to each other when they already know where they are coming from but a bit difficult when it comes to discussion between not well known points of views. This is why if I only stated some facts and did not explain them then one will not know what I am trying to say and why, this is why some detail becomes absolutely necessary or one will never know what I am trying to explain or why.
Let me make it absolutely clear that I do not reject any source of information about deen of islam at all. What I reject is the idea that all sources are equal with the quraan. That I cannot accept unless someone can clearly prove that that is the case beyond any reasonable doubt which no one has done so far in my life time. Looking at something clearly visible through smeared glasses is not going to let us see the thing clearly likewise looking at clear message of God through problematic hadis reports is not going to help us understand the quran properly. Moreover each thing has its own place value just like numbers in maths. One cannot just say a number but needs to have a context otherwise the number will not make any sense. Words likewise only make sense when they have contexts or a purposes to serve.
The reason I take the quran to be the only foundation of deen of islam is because it was God who created this world according to his plan for his purpose alone. This is why it was he who wanted to reveal his plan and purpose for mankind therefore he decided to send his messages for mankind. For this reason he devised a communication channel or chain through which he communicated his message for mankind. The revelation chain is not an exception rather like any other set up of this universe for various other purposes it is just another set up to serve a particular purpose eg one can look at ecosystem or solar system or rain cycle etc etc. The communication chain includes God and his missionaries ie people who work for him.
This explanation should make it very clear that communication channel and message of God are two different things. Purpose of communication channel is to act as medium for transmission of message of God and purpose of message of God is to guide mankind regarding matters which God thought were important for mankind to know so that mankind could fulfil his purpose for their part in his scheme of things. So everything revolves around plan and purpose of God for which he created this universe and people in it. Had God no purpose for creating this universe and people in it with ability of limited freedom of choice then he needed no plan nor did he need to create this universe. So making proper sense of his purpose and his plan is a basic necessity for understanding deen of islam because that is the reason he told mankind a way of life whereby they could fulfil his purpose according to his plan.
As for message of God once it reaches people through people it is up to people to accept it or reject it with their own understanding of it as they see fit for themselves. This message needs prior understanding of things before people could understand it. If it is given to people who lack in needed knowledge then they will not know what to do with it and the best example for that is human babies. Anything you give to a human baby he puts it in his mouth taking it as his feed. The only people who can understand the message in the quran is those who are literate themselves and have good knowledge of things the quran is talking about or those to whom the quran is recited and explained by others and they become sensible enough to make proper sense of things. The rest are as good as living dead.
This should explain why I say the quran should be understood in light of real world realities because that is what the quran is actually about ie it is a teaching for mankind as to how to live properly in this world. If I say to a baby make me a cup of tea. The baby will not know what I am talking about because baby has not yet learned words or relationship of words with things in the real world. He can repeat my words if he can talk but cannot carry out my request. This will remain the situation till baby grows enough and has sufficient life experience to come to know what my request meant for him. Only and only then he will be able to carry out my request. The quran is not any different when it comes to learning it for its proper understanding. Only those people come to understand it properly who have learned the way to understand it properly and they have learned the needed information and have the needed life experience. So all people who claim to know the quran if they are questioned about it, a huge majority of them will be dumbfounded.
The real point here is, it is God who wanted to send his message for mankind because he had to tell something to mankind and not messenger of God because messenger of God did not create people for his purpose according to his plan. The part messenger of God played in this scheme is, message bearer, ie just to pass on God's message to people after understanding it himself ie before he could do that he had to make sense of the message of God for himself according to his time and available human knowledge because he too had to act upon it and the message told him to deliver it to others and that is why he delivered it to others or taught it to others to the best of his God given abilities. We need to remember that God passed on his message to his messenger for himself and others not just for himself nor just for others.
By giving the wrong job description of messenger we are turning him into a God instead of God's messenger. The messenger was supposed to deliver message of God as it was ie as he received it from God, without adding anything to it or taking away anything from it. This is why the quran tells us he did not speak anything as quran other than the quran itself. It does not mean whatever he said or did was always revelations of God. It is because messengers of God made odd mistakes that is why their those stories are also told in the quran to ensure people do not take them for other than human beings. When a person himself makes mistakes how can he create a message like that of God's message by himself? It is because messengers of God are also human beings they too are prone to making mistakes called human errors but God draws their attention to their errors in some way and they correct them. However no messenger of God ever does anything wrong deliberately or intentionally.
The mistake people make in trying to understand this issue is that they do not separate the communication chain from the message the chain is supposed to deliver for which the communication chain is set up by God who made sure it worked for his purpose according to his plan and it does and that is why we have the quran today so many centuries after the final messenger of God has gone from this world. This is why the actual framework or structure of deen of islam has to come from the quran alone not from mixed sources particularly when those sources are prone to mistakes and errors beyond corrections. During the revelation of the quraan any mistake made by the messenger of God was corrected by God but after the stopping of the revelation when people started attributing things to him there was no revelation from God any more for correcting people. This is why whatever people attributed to God or his messenger was no longer as reliable as whatever was left behind by the messenger of God as the quran. This is why distinguishing between revelation of God and reports by people becomes inevitable.
The fact is, messengers of God have been making mistakes and that is what the quran itself tells us. For this reason God could not tell us to follow them unconditionally or blindly that is why whenever God tells us to follow his messenger it means in things which he did according to the quran to fulfil his God given mission and not absolutely in each and everything he said or did. To follow anyone absolutely is naturally impossible because one can never know each and everything about anyone even on daily basis or we ought to have moment to moment diaries of messenger of God not hadis books. Moreover look at human attention span. How many people can remain fully alert and aware or attentive during a whole 24 hour day? People get tired after a while and that is why people go to sleep or rest to recoup their energy. Even when we are fully attentive we cannot pay attention to everything that is happening all around us. If we look at one things in front of us there is another thing going on behind us. We can only focus on one thing at a time. This is why when a magician makes us look at one thing in one of his hands he does something else with his other hand to which we are not paying attention in order to trick us. So due to such natural limitations how much can we know about anyone at all including our own very selves?
So people who tell us we know each and everything about the messenger of God are not realising what they are saying or claiming about messenger of God otherwise they could never claim what they claim about messenger of God. Moreover there are things which messengers of Allah said and did as reported in hadis books which if we said and did we will become kaafir therefore it is wrong to say we must follow messenger of God absolutely and unconditionally without any limits or qualifications. So I do not see what is so difficult there to understand if people have learned the knowledge they need to, to make proper sense of the message in the quran? If they have not learned the needed knowledge to understand the message in the quran properly then they cannot understand any explanation no matter how detailed it is. It is because we human beings are born not knowing a thing and it takes us ages to grow up by learning things bit by bit on daily basis. This is the real extent of explanation that is required for a human being to start making proper sense of things.
Moreover how can one use a secondary source to interpret the main source if secondary source itself depends upon main source for its qualification or authenticity? This is why the quran alone has to be the foundation of deen of islam. However once we have derived the structure or framework of deen of islam from the quran alone in light of real world realities thereafter we can use all other sources to fill in details where need be that is consistent with the framework of deen of islam as derived from the quran alone just like bits of jig saw puzzle. I am saying real world realities because the quran is all about how people ought to live in the real world. Deen of islam is nothing other than a way of life advised by Allah for mankind to live in this world properly to fulfil his purpose of creating them according to his given plan or roadmap or program.
Furthermore mullahs have misinterpreted the quran by telling us it is a complete code of life instead of telling us we need to extract framework of deen of islam from the quran to form a complete code of life to live by. The quran does not give us a fully worked out constitution and laws for organising human society and regulating it. This is why we do not have ummah as the final messenger of God left behind after its formation on basis of the quran alone. As I see it unless people go back to the quran alone as foundation of deen of islam there is not going to be any ummah in the future either as it has not been over the so many past centuries.For a detailed explanation of things see HERE and HERE.
Last edited:
paki-muslim
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: علم کی دنیا جذبات کی دنیا نہیں ہوتی
ghamdi aik fitna hai, jo apney alfaaz main uljha kar logo ko Deen islam se door ley ja raha hai ,ghamdi fitney ney apni books aur lectures main nai nai batein Islam main ijaad kar raha hai,ghamdi fitney ki nazar main sood dena jaiz hai,sharab ki koi saza nahi,zana ki islami saza main takhfeef,aurat mardo(men) ki namaz ki imamat karwa sakti hai,aurat baghair mehram k hajj pe ja sakti hai,Hazrat Imama Mehdi aleheysalam ka koi wajood aur hadees main sirf Qissey kahania hain (nauzubillah).
ghamdi fitnye k kuch aur akaid,
He rejects:
1. Any form of Had (Prescribed Punishment),
2. Hadith to be direct
3. Nazool Eesa Alahi Salam and his Life (like Qadiyanis)
4. Had for an Apostate (Murtad)
5. Claims the 7 recitations of quran to be wrong (he is a close ally and aide of Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer)
6. Music and Dancing of all sorts is permissible
7. Jihad against oppression is the only jihad allowed
8. The Shahadat of a man and woman are equal
9. There is no concept of Purdah (Hijab / Veil) in Islam,
kuch videos proof is thread main hazir hain,baki aap youtube aur itnernet pe aur search kr saktey hain = http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...0-06-2012-J-A-Ghamidi-TAX-or-ZAKAT-Must-Watch
ghamdi aik fitna hai, jo apney alfaaz main uljha kar logo ko Deen islam se door ley ja raha hai ,ghamdi fitney ney apni books aur lectures main nai nai batein Islam main ijaad kar raha hai,ghamdi fitney ki nazar main sood dena jaiz hai,sharab ki koi saza nahi,zana ki islami saza main takhfeef,aurat mardo(men) ki namaz ki imamat karwa sakti hai,aurat baghair mehram k hajj pe ja sakti hai,Hazrat Imama Mehdi aleheysalam ka koi wajood aur hadees main sirf Qissey kahania hain (nauzubillah).
ghamdi fitnye k kuch aur akaid,
He rejects:
1. Any form of Had (Prescribed Punishment),
2. Hadith to be direct
3. Nazool Eesa Alahi Salam and his Life (like Qadiyanis)
4. Had for an Apostate (Murtad)
5. Claims the 7 recitations of quran to be wrong (he is a close ally and aide of Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer)
6. Music and Dancing of all sorts is permissible
7. Jihad against oppression is the only jihad allowed
8. The Shahadat of a man and woman are equal
9. There is no concept of Purdah (Hijab / Veil) in Islam,
kuch videos proof is thread main hazir hain,baki aap youtube aur itnernet pe aur search kr saktey hain = http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...0-06-2012-J-A-Ghamidi-TAX-or-ZAKAT-Must-Watch
Last edited:
angryoldman
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: ریاست کے خلاف بغاوت اور اسلام- جاوید غامدی
غامدی صرف اکیلا نہیں بلکہ غامدیت کے فتنے میں تبدیل ہو چکا ہے.جس کے پاس بوہت سارے سپونسر ہیں.جو اس کی گندی سوچ کو دنیا میں عام کرنے میں مدد دے رہے ہیں
غامدی صرف اکیلا نہیں بلکہ غامدیت کے فتنے میں تبدیل ہو چکا ہے.جس کے پاس بوہت سارے سپونسر ہیں.جو اس کی گندی سوچ کو دنیا میں عام کرنے میں مدد دے رہے ہیں
paki-muslim
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: ریاست کے خلاف بغاوت اور اسلام- جاوید غامدی
ghamdi aik fitna hai, jo apney alfaaz main uljha kar logo ko Deen islam se door ley ja raha hai ,ghamdi fitney ney apni books aur lectures main nai nai batein Islam main ijaad kar raha hai,ghamdi fitney ki nazar main sood dena jaiz hai,sharab ki koi saza nahi,zana ki islami saza main takhfeef,aurat mardo(men) ki namaz ki imamat karwa sakti hai,aurat baghair mehram k hajj pe ja sakti hai,Hazrat Imama Mehdi aleheysalam ka koi wajood aur hadees main sirf Qissey kahania hain (nauzubillah).
ghamdi fitnye k kuch aur akaid,
He rejects:
1. Any form of Had (Prescribed Punishment),
2. Hadith to be direct
3. Nazool Eesa Alahi Salam and his Life (like Qadiyanis)
4. Had for an Apostate (Murtad)
5. Claims the 7 recitations of quran to be wrong (he is a close ally and aide of Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer)
6. Music and Dancing of all sorts is permissible
7. Jihad against oppression is the only jihad allowed
8. The Shahadat of a man and woman are equal
9. There is no concept of Purdah (Hijab / Veil) in Islam,
kuch videos proof is thread main hazir hain,baki aap youtube aur itnernet pe aur search kr saktey hain = http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...0-06-2012-J-A-Ghamidi-TAX-or-ZAKAT-Must-Watch
ghamdi aik fitna hai, jo apney alfaaz main uljha kar logo ko Deen islam se door ley ja raha hai ,ghamdi fitney ney apni books aur lectures main nai nai batein Islam main ijaad kar raha hai,ghamdi fitney ki nazar main sood dena jaiz hai,sharab ki koi saza nahi,zana ki islami saza main takhfeef,aurat mardo(men) ki namaz ki imamat karwa sakti hai,aurat baghair mehram k hajj pe ja sakti hai,Hazrat Imama Mehdi aleheysalam ka koi wajood aur hadees main sirf Qissey kahania hain (nauzubillah).
ghamdi fitnye k kuch aur akaid,
He rejects:
1. Any form of Had (Prescribed Punishment),
2. Hadith to be direct
3. Nazool Eesa Alahi Salam and his Life (like Qadiyanis)
4. Had for an Apostate (Murtad)
5. Claims the 7 recitations of quran to be wrong (he is a close ally and aide of Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer)
6. Music and Dancing of all sorts is permissible
7. Jihad against oppression is the only jihad allowed
8. The Shahadat of a man and woman are equal
9. There is no concept of Purdah (Hijab / Veil) in Islam,
kuch videos proof is thread main hazir hain,baki aap youtube aur itnernet pe aur search kr saktey hain = http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...0-06-2012-J-A-Ghamidi-TAX-or-ZAKAT-Must-Watch
Mojo-jojo
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: ریاست کے خلاف بغاوت اور اسلام- جاوید غامدی
اتنا غصہ کرنے کی ضرورت نہیں - غامدی کو کبھی غور سے اور ٹھنڈے دل سے سننے کی اور سمجھنے کی کوشش کریں انشاءاللہ آپ کی غلط فہمیاں دور ہوجائیں گی اور
ہم بھی آپ کی شفایابی کیلئے دعا کریں گے
اتنا غصہ کرنے کی ضرورت نہیں - غامدی کو کبھی غور سے اور ٹھنڈے دل سے سننے کی اور سمجھنے کی کوشش کریں انشاءاللہ آپ کی غلط فہمیاں دور ہوجائیں گی اور
ہم بھی آپ کی شفایابی کیلئے دعا کریں گے
