YES it was proven that yousuf was kazzab. He was given death penalty and the lawyer who fought the case against him published a book outlining all the facts where the kazzab himself admitted to a lot.
I would like to repeat brother Pakhtoon's question here to all Zh followers why bring a stupid question like this here. What are you people trying to gain from it here??
So whats the game here??? Kazzab is someone who calls himself to be Nabi after The Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad pbuh. Yusuf kazzab was found guilty of blasphemy and if someone pays a little attention a lot of material can be found on the subject. There are websites dedicated on the subject. You only need to open your eyes. If you are one of the blind followers of zaid hamid then you are not the one who would pay attention to whatever is said whether true or not you don't give a damn.
As for me I am karachiwala, I am not kazzab and I stay away from anyone who might even be remotely involved in the blasphemy of my beloved Prophet pbuh.
Pakistani Bhai,
Aap Har Baat Ka Tana Bana Apni Makhsoos Philosophy Say Ja Milatay Hain
Aur Phir Mujhay Ilzam Deitay Hain Main Topic Ko Titter Bitter Karta Hoon
Kitni Baar Aap Say Arz Ki Hai Kah Aap Kay Nazriyat Say Musilmano Ka Taluq Nahi Hai, Phir Bhi Aap Ki Wahi Murghy Ki Aik Tang!
Ab Aap Phir Iss Kay Jawab Mian Woh Ayat Quote Karain Gain Jin Kay Utarnay Ka Makhsoos Pas e Manzar Tha.
Pas e Manzar Say Baat Ati Hai Jo Guzar Gaya, Jo Guzar Gaya Woh Bhi Unseen Hota Hai, Ab Ap Ka Dawa Hai Kah Unseen Ka Sirf Khuda Ko Pata Hai, Yani Jo Guzar Gaya Woh Bhi Sirf Allah Janta Hai, To Yakeenen Ap Ko Ayat Kay Pas e Manzar Ka Koi Ilm Nahi.
Ab Jab Kah Aap Ko Pas e Mazar Ka Hee Ilm Nahi To Aap Ayats Ko Samajhnay Ka bhi Dawa Nahi Kar Saktay.
Phir To Yakeenan Ap Man Mani Tafseer Karain Gay!
I respect the school of thought to which "karachiwala", and Pakistni1947 belong, and appriciate the initiatives taken Jamia Binory Town, and am a reader of Zarb-e-Momin since long. But one always has to keep the following facts aside to appreciate their good effort, which I often do:
1. They opposed the very concept of the creation of Pakistan as a separate country, and declared Qaid-e-Azam as "Kafir-e-Azam". Moulana Azad belonged to this category. And even now more often than not they claim that they were not involved in the sin of the creation of Pakistan.
2. No tolerance for the other schools of thought among the Muslims. And show Takfiri/Kharji like behavior, if they don't get really so, I fear. Have always adopted the "holier than thou" attitude, and divided the Ummah on sectarian basis by sowing the seeds of Nifaq.
3. The terrorist organizations like Sipah-e-Sihaba and Lashkr-e-Jangvi which are really shaking the very foundation of Pakistan are backed and supported by them.
4. More often than not they use the Ayaat-e-Quran and Hadees pbuh to support their typical mentality
??????????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ???? ????????? ????????? ????? ??? ???????? ????????????
They bartered away Allah's revelations for paltry worldly gains and then debarred others from His Way: indeed very evil were the deeds they did
5. Throw all the teachings of Islam to the wind to support their typical approach when it comes to abuse some Muslim, or some material benefit. They don't even abstain from false accusation (Bohtaan Tarashi). Here are some of the cases in point from the present:
i. Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam (JUI) lead by Maulana Fazl-Ur-Rehman is the political party which represents their school of thought. And the character of the leader and the role of the party reflects it all--from supporting women rule, political bribes-Diesel, land allotments................. Had Abdullah-Ibn-Ubai (***** Ullah) alive today, he would have saluted and been proud of “Maulana Fazl-Ur-Rehman” .
ii. Condemnation of False accusations (bohtan) by the Last Prophet pbuh is very obvious. When Maulana Saeed Jalapury got target killed due to his typical affiliation with a terrorist outfit, they must have known who is their opponent and could be behind that cold blooded murder. In the latest joint investigation report of intelligence agencies published in all leading newspapers including “Ummat” the murder of the aforesaid Maulana was done by another sect’s terrorist outfit “Sipah-e-Muhammad”. And who doesn’t know that in sectarian target killing 100s of people have been brutally counter murdered by Sipah-e-Sahabah and Sipah-e-Muhammad. However, blinded with the hate against a single person known as Zaid Hamid some Ulama-e-Soo belonging to JUI dramatically appeared in press conference and started accusing him :
Please also enlighten us on the following in the light of teachings and opinion/verdict of the Last Prophet pbuh on:
a) False accusation? In the light of Sahih Ahaadees, and its interpretation by four well known Aaima-e-Ahle Sunnat.
b) On whom the fatwa of kufr returns when one declares somebody Kafir ( even when a person just claims Kalma-e-Shahadat with tongue )? Leave aside the clarifications against all the accusations and firm belief on the Khatm-e-Nabuwat pbuh. And declaring the Munkr-e-Khatam Nabuwat as hell bound Kafir.
c) Allah (SWT) revealed the names of Munafqeen (***** Ullah) to his most beloved and the Last Prophet pbuh, and he revealed it to a confidante Sahabi (RA) [whose father embraced Shahadat in Ghazwa-e-Uhad (at the time of confusion/turmoil by the Muslims mistakenly) ] with what instructions? With the exception of Abdullah Ibn Ubai (***** Ullah)
???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ??????
???? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??