?? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ???
??? ??? ?? ?? ??????? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ????
?? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??.
???? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ??. ???? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???? ??. ???? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?? ?? ???? ????? ?? ?? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?? ???, ???? ???? ????? ??? ?? ???-
?????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???.
?? ??? ????? ??? ???? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??? ???? ??
? ???? ????? ?? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???? ??? ?? ???? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ???? ??? ???? ?? ????? ?? ??? ???
??? ???? ?? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?? ?? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?? ?? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??????
???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??? ?? ?? ???? ????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ?? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????
??? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?? ?? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ????? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???
Bibi there are a couple of problems here:
1. No one has the right to malign institutions, only way to go around this is to provide solid evidences. Even in case of individuals you can't play freedom of speech card, the potential for causing damage is too great. There is a reason why you hear so many conspiracy theories in alternative media (social) but rarely find such trash on mainstream media. Problem here is that Mainstream media is acting like social media. Anchors think they have the right to malign anyone, how many anchors have discussed cases of Malik Riaz in detail which are fundamental in the sense that MR claims courts are blackmailing him due to the same cases. With about a hundred cases against him how many complainants were called on line in any of the TV programs? Even if one agrees that freedom of speech means MR has the right to malign anyone (which is not the case) even then anchors have to represent both sides fairly, they should have called the victims of Bahria Town.
2. Planted interview here means that Anchors are asking questions which have already been decided with Malik Riaz, then prey tell how it becomes fair representation of facts? I have no qualms if an anchor announces that Malik Riaz has been given a free reign and he is presenting only his side of story but on the program you don't hear any such announcements. Why pose impartiality in such cases?
3. Courts all over the world don't allow media trials when the cases are actually being heard in the court (They allow fair representation in the court premises only, not on the streets). A fair media trial will mean that judges will be seated along with Malik Riaz giving explanations and justifications for their rulings. There is also an other consideration that court rulings are also public record and if you so desire you can get the complete rulings from court premises.
4. The last line in your post is very interesting, Anchors become kings when they plant interviews and then become a tool of false propaganda thus turning public opinion in their desired direction. Mehr Bukhari has exactly done the same thing, she played on public emotions by posing as an impartial journalist while playing a script all the time.
5. I think you get your kicks from things like that! (bigsmile)