which guy?
Well, this thread is on Merchant so by 'the guy' I meant Mr. Mercahant.
Tariq Mir didn't Agree or denied and if we believe that released document then there were 4 names and how could a fifth person Mr Merchant could validate that these documents are true. I had quoted a Hadith because someone has released a document showing Tariq Mir police interview. Various people and anchors distributed it and discussed it without even checking the sources. Now MET has said the issues report is not in their records so who else has released this?
The bigger question is the content of the document. As I said the denial form the MET and Tariq Mir have been technical and cryptic at best.
MET of course if not going to comment about the content of the document. Well, there are a lot of things that circulate on social media and our (un)professional media
get hyped up about it all the time.
as far as accepting or rejecting is concerned I believe everyone has a right to do that because your admission or rejection can give more fuel or better instead some material that can be used against you especially if you are under investigation.
Please explain to me how a statement that you never made will hurt your case? I am just at a loss trying to understand as to how denying making a statement that you never made in the first place will or has ever hurt someone's ongoing legal case. Why use the technical jargon? For what purpose?
intersting thing is that most of this stuff is released by Murtaza Ali Shah, who is very close to Dr Shahid and he was very close'jab to Altaf Hussein during his pre NA246 election speech.
Again, I am not sure if attacking or questioning the credibility, authenticity and motives of the messenger will help MQM's case.