Pakistans misguided obsession with infrastructure

Aslan

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The government is building more airports, roads and railways, even though the existing ones are underused

20170121_ASP002_0.jpg


NEARLY 20 years after it opened, Pakistans first motorway still has a desolate feel. There is scant traffic along the 375km link between Islamabad and Lahore (pictured). Motorists can drive for miles without seeing another vehicle, save perhaps for traffic cops manning speed traps. As the two cities are already connected by the Grand Trunk Road, which is 90km shorter and toll-free, there is simply not much demand for a motorway.

Yet this $1.2bn white elephant is one of the proudest achievements of Nawaz Sharif, who was prime minister when it opened in 1997 and is once again running Pakistan. Mr Sharif, who enjoys comparisons to Sher Shah Suri, a 16th-century ruler who renovated the Grand Trunk Road, never tires of talking about it. He regained power in 2013 with a campaign which both harked back to his famous road and promised more infrastructure to come. He even pledged bullet trains that would enable pious passengers to leave Karachi after dawn prayers and arrive in Peshawar, more than 1,000km to the north, in time for evening worship.

It is an article of faith for Mr Sharif and his party, the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), that investment in infrastructure is a foolproof way of boosting the economy. His government is racing to finish umpteen projects before the next election, due by mid-2018, including a metro line in Lahore and a new airport for Islamabad. The likelihood is that the new airport (which has been plagued with problems, including runways that have been built too close together) will be as underused as most of the countrys other airports, many of which are modern and spacious.

Pakistans infrastructure is underused because the economic boom it was meant to trigger has never arrived. Over the past three years the government has successfully staved off a balance-of-payments crisis, achieving some measure of macroeconomic stability. It has trimmed the budget deficit, partly by broadening the tax take and partly by cutting energy subsidies. That, along with lower oil prices, has narrowed Pakistans trade deficit and allowed it to begin rebuilding its foreign-exchange reserves. The stockmarket has risen by 50% since the end of 2015.

But terrorism and insurgency have put off investors, both foreign and domestic. The country is also held back by inefficient and often cartelised industries, which have fallen behind rivals in India and Bangladesh. Exports, 60% of which are textiles, have been shrinking for years. Much more needs to be done to create an educated workforce. Almost half of all those aged five to 16 are out of school25m children. Health, like education, is woefully underfunded, in part because successive governments shy away from taxing the wealthy. Only 0.6% of the population pays income tax. As the World Bank puts it, Pakistans long-term development depends on better nutrition, health and education.

Cement to be

But Mr Sharifs government is pinning its hopes on yet more infrastructure to fix the countrys economic problems, in the form of a $46bn investment scheme known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Much of it is being financed on commercial terms, including several power plants. Pakistan undoubtedly needs to relieve a chronic shortage of electricity. But critics fear the country will struggle to pay back the debt, especially if foreign-exchange earnings from exports continue to dwindle. At the very least, the government will need to continue chasing deadbeat customers to pay their bills and cutting expensive subsidiessteps that are deeply unpopular.

In addition to boosting Pakistans power supply, CPEC is supposed to link China by land to Gwadar, a deep-water port on the Arabian Sea, in the hope of creating a lucrative new trade route. New or upgraded roads will stretch the length of the country. The Karakoram Highway between the two countries, which was built in the 1960s at vast expense over a high and crumbly mountain range, is being upgraded as part of the trade corridor. But it forever needs patching up and is little used. Sceptics say Xinjiang, Chinas westernmost region, is still too poor for better transport links to make much difference to Pakistans economy. Securing isolated stretches of road from separatist rebels in Balochistan is also gobbling up large amounts of cash.

Lijian Zhao, a Chinese diplomat, says China is all too aware that Pakistan needs more than just big-ticket infrastructure if it is to flourish. Disarmingly, he praises the efforts of Britain and other countries to improve Pakistans software, such as education and the rule of law. But Chinas expertise is hardware, says Mr Zhao.It may not concern Mr Sharif unduly if the next generation of roads is as deserted as the last. Civilian governments have often struggled to get much done in between military coups, but voters are impressed by gleaming new projects, even if they never use them.

Its an approach that has worked for Mr Sharifs brother, Shehbaz, the popular chief minister of Punjab province. He has lavished resources on endless sequences of over- and underpasses to create signal-free traffic corridors in Lahore, the provincial capital, that are of most benefit to the rich minority who can afford cars.

There are limits, however. Khawaja Saad Rafique, the railways minister, recently admitted to parliament that the country would not be getting a bullet train after all. When we asked the Chinese about it, they laughed at us, he said.

source :
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DrFixit

MPA (400+ posts)
I would agree that Govt is hell bent on infrastructure, but I don't agree writer's claim about motorway being scant of traffic. I travel Lhr ISB 5 to 7 times a month and this claim is further from truth. Over the years Motorway has become quite busy and I am pretty sure authorities are raking in excess of 100 million Rupees a day.

Infrastructure are important and growing need of large population, it includes hospitals and educational establishments as well as roads, however, the Govt is hell bent on roads infrastructure and completely ignoring all other areas where there is dire need of improvement, but we lack both common wisdom and funding.
 

akmal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
یہ بھائی فضول بحث ہے. نون لیگ اور انکے کارکن ایمان رکھتے ہیں کہ ترقی صرف سڑک کو کہتے ہیں. پورے ملک کی ایک ہی سڑک بنا دو. موٹروے جس راستے میں بنی ہے کوئی بتا دے کہ وہاں کے لوگوں کی زندگیوں میں کیا تبدیلی آئی ہے؟ کیا وہاں ایک بھی شہر یا قصبہ ہے جو پاکستان کے پہلے سے ترقی یافتہ شہروں کو پیچھے چھوڑ گیا ہو؟ سڑک تو ہوتی ہی گاڑی والے کیلئے ہے. لیکن ایک عام انسان اپنی زندگی کا کتنا گاڑی میں گزارتا ہے؟ آپ جب بھی موٹروے کی بات کریں گے صرف اور صرف بڑی بڑی گاڑیوں والے یہاں آ کر موٹروے کی تعریفیں کریں گے کہ کیا زبردست سڑک ہے؟ جناب عام آدمی کی زندگی میں کیا فرق پڑتا ہے؟ اشرفیہ اپنے فائدے کی چیزیں بنا کر کہتی ہے دیکھو دیکھو کتنی ترقی ہو رہی ہے
 

atensari

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
میاں صاحب کو سڑکیں بنانے کا ہیضہ کیوں ہے اس کے لئے ان کے بچپن کا نفسیاتی تجزیہ درکار. پتہ چلایا جائے کے بچپن میں ایسا کیا ہوا جس نے انھے اس عارضے میں مبتلا کر رکھا ہے
 

RajaRawal111

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Sha bash "Bus Tun Ke Rakho". Aagey pichey dekhne ki koi zaroorat nahen
یہ بھائی فضول بحث ہے. نون لیگ اور انکے کارکن ایمان رکھتے ہیں کہ ترقی صرف سڑک کو کہتے ہیں. پورے ملک کی ایک ہی سڑک بنا دو. موٹروے جس راستے میں بنی ہے کوئی بتا دے کہ وہاں کے لوگوں کی زندگیوں میں کیا تبدیلی آئی ہے؟ کیا وہاں ایک بھی شہر یا قصبہ ہے جو پاکستان کے پہلے سے ترقی یافتہ شہروں کو پیچھے چھوڑ گیا ہو؟ سڑک تو ہوتی ہی گاڑی والے کیلئے ہے. لیکن ایک عام انسان اپنی زندگی کا کتنا گاڑی میں گزارتا ہے؟ آپ جب بھی موٹروے کی بات کریں گے صرف اور صرف بڑی بڑی گاڑیوں والے یہاں آ کر موٹروے کی تعریفیں کریں گے کہ کیا زبردست سڑک ہے؟ جناب عام آدمی کی زندگی میں کیا فرق پڑتا ہے؟ اشرفیہ اپنے فائدے کی چیزیں بنا کر کہتی ہے دیکھو دیکھو کتنی ترقی ہو رہی ہے
 

Politically1981

MPA (400+ posts)
I would agree that Govt is hell bent on infrastructure, but I don't agree writer's claim about motorway being scant of traffic. I travel Lhr ISB 5 to 7 times a month and this claim is further from truth. Over the years Motorway has become quite busy and I am pretty sure authorities are raking in excess of 100 million Rupees a day.

Infrastructure are important and growing need of large population, it includes hospitals and educational establishments as well as roads, however, the Govt is hell bent on roads infrastructure and completely ignoring all other areas where there is dire need of improvement, but we lack both common wisdom and funding.

just came back from Peshawar last night, it is as scant and a ghost road as it could be. This has always been my and many of my friends' in England view. Such a waste, you don't see a car for miles or some slow moving vehicles here and there. In England and Europe, you will find motorways with lots of vehicles almost all the time.
 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Thoughtful article; jab se hamaray gaon mein sarak bani ha, navein pod majjaan le pathhay nahein le andi, sarkaan te h pirday rehnde ne.
 

Shahid Abassi

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
آپ جو بھی کہیں لیکن آپ یہ بات جھٹلا نہیں سکتے کہ
موٹر وے سے سینکڑوں کلومیٹر دور یزمان منڈی، بھکر یا رجھان کے کسی چھوٹے سے گاؤں میں بیٹھا ہر وہ پھتو نتھو خیرا جو اپنے گھرانے کی دو وقت کی روٹی پوری نہیں کر سکتا، جانوروں کے تالاب سے گدلا پانی پیتا ہے اور اپنے بچوں کو سکول نہیں بھیج سکتا وہ بھی یہ ضرور کہتا ہے :۔
یار لاہور نوں پیرس بنا دتا نواز شریف نے، تے کی لشکارے ماردیاں سڑکاں بنا ریا اے۔ سنیا ہُن تے لاہور وچ اْتے ای اْتے کھٹے رنگ دی گڈی وی چلیا کرے گی۔ یار توں میٹرو بس دے ٹیشن ویکھ ۔ کیا بات اے امریکہ نوں وی پیچھے چھڈ گیا ۔ میرا ووٹ تے پکا نواز شریف دا اے۔



یہ بھائی فضول بحث ہے. نون لیگ اور انکے کارکن ایمان رکھتے ہیں کہ ترقی صرف سڑک کو کہتے ہیں. پورے ملک کی ایک ہی سڑک بنا دو. موٹروے جس راستے میں بنی ہے کوئی بتا دے کہ وہاں کے لوگوں کی زندگیوں میں کیا تبدیلی آئی ہے؟ کیا وہاں ایک بھی شہر یا قصبہ ہے جو پاکستان کے پہلے سے ترقی یافتہ شہروں کو پیچھے چھوڑ گیا ہو؟ سڑک تو ہوتی ہی گاڑی والے کیلئے ہے. لیکن ایک عام انسان اپنی زندگی کا کتنا گاڑی میں گزارتا ہے؟ آپ جب بھی موٹروے کی بات کریں گے صرف اور صرف بڑی بڑی گاڑیوں والے یہاں آ کر موٹروے کی تعریفیں کریں گے کہ کیا زبردست سڑک ہے؟ جناب عام آدمی کی زندگی میں کیا فرق پڑتا ہے؟ اشرفیہ اپنے فائدے کی چیزیں بنا کر کہتی ہے دیکھو دیکھو کتنی ترقی ہو رہی ہے
 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
just came back from Peshawar last night, it is as scant and a ghost road as it could be. This has always been my and many of my friends' in England view. Such a waste, you don't see a car for miles or some slow moving vehicles here and there. In England and Europe, you will find motorways with lots of vehicles almost all the time.

And look at PTI do nothing Govt, they haven't done a thing to remove these wasteful roads, and yet they want their power expanded to Islamabad and Lahore. Do they know how many roads are out there to do something about.
 

Politically1981

MPA (400+ posts)
And look at PTI do nothing Govt, they haven't done a thing to remove these wasteful roads, and yet they want their power expanded to Islamabad and Lahore. Do they know how many roads are out there to do something about.
While I appreciate your sarcasm, I don't know exactly what you meant? PTI has transformed health, education, local bodies, revenue and police. Ask anyone and they would agree that teachers are going to school, police is not taking bribes, patwsris are not taking money under the table. Health insurance (insaf cards) is a major initiative. These are the fundamental reforms that have laid the foundation of modern KPK.
 

Zesh Zeshu

Senator (1k+ posts)
Har chieaz ki apni ik value hay ,investor ko attract karnay k liye infrastructure zarori hy ,agar ap k pass infrastructure he nai to who on the earth will invest I am from Multan ap khetay k roads say kuch nai hota ,Bosan road aj say 5 sal phelay kidher tha and ab kidhre hy the only difference is the development , the ease of access through road , Sub say ziyada investment is waqt is he jaga ho rai because of better road condition Multan k sub bari colonies colleges unis , Plaza food chain is he jaga pe hain ,you can't deny the importance of infrastructure.
These project generates the economic activity ,Construction material do it not generate the revenue ,labour engineers etc do they not generate jobs ?
I agree to this the pmln is more tilt towards development projects than the other projects ,I'll quote the Dr samar Mubarik line which he said in the reply of question ''why so many kids are out of school'' He said we can easily blame the Gov or parents but Main reason is that not going school kids parents are very poor that's why they send them to work rather than to school so that at the end of the day these kids will bring some money at home .
The article is totally biased and paid content totally out of context stuff been shared in it ,it is as same biased stuff which was been planted few months ago regarding western and eastern route as now that issue has been solved now these people come up with new stuff.

 

Talwar Gujjar

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
While I appreciate your sarcasm, I don't know exactly what you meant? PTI has transformed health, education, local bodies, revenue and police. Ask anyone and they would agree that teachers are going to school, police is not taking bribes, patwsris are not taking money under the table. Health insurance (insaf cards) is a major initiative. These are the fundamental reforms that have laid the foundation of modern KPK.

Just loud talk, nothing has changed on the ground. Go check it out, or read some local newspapers.
 

Sohail Shuja

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
If I agree to what the the PTI followers on this thread say, then there is a natural question that why Mr. KHattak was so vocal about the western route? if roads do not play a role in providing the baseline for your economic growth. Moreover, I am also inclined to ask about the new railway service they are launching in KPK with the help of Chinese investment (I guess it is called the greenline train, but not sure) and last but not the least, what about Peshawar Metro Project, truly inspired by the metros developed in other parts of Pakistan by PML(N)???

However, to the implications of economics, it is a fact that infrastructure is necessary for economic development, but it is not the only thing. There should be a balanced approach towards investment to boost the economy.

The people criticizing the motorway M-2 project clearly do not have any knowledge about its true impacts. I have lived through that development. I know that how and when the investments into Chakwal district were made, when three of the cement factories were built there due to ease of transportation provided by motorway M-2. Likewise, I remember that in 1990's, the cloth and apparel market in the north of Pakistan was quite expensive, the reason being that if you had to go to Faisalabad from Rawalpindi, the journey was about 11 hours/side (22 hours round trip). Also, the production costs of the Textile sector in Faisalabad got a boost due to sourcing cheaper raw material from the north. Like for many industrial processes of dying and printing, they require coal based boilers and that coal can is easily sourced from teh northern areas of Pakistan and from Afghanistan and now its transportation cost is lowered due to motorway.

But having said that only the investment in the areas required reaps the results. Apart from Motorway, if we look at the project of Rawalpindi Metero, it is a total waste of money. It is a white elephant for the government as the traffic problem of Murree road RWP could have been much better handled if they spent only a quarter of that money in making a new route between the twin cities.

Now that all that money in infrastructure has been locked and is not returning anything in concrete to the Government and the public, think of the subsidy the government is providing for the operation of this Metero service in Rwp. Moreover, The subsidy provided by the government to run this white elephant is also going to waste and it is an added expense for the taxpayer's money. I have asked many people that how does this contribute to our economy with respect to the capital and operational costs, no one was even able to provide me a single solid answer.






 

Back
Top