Obama Doctrine: War Escalation for Peace? (omg):angry_smile:
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
___________________
Even while remaining a usual American politician of gimmicks, Obama's diplomacy has failed both abroad and at home because he is insincere. He has betrayed Americans and Africans, Arabs and non-Arabs, Whites and Blacks. Neither his allies are safe nor are his opponents happy. Both terrocracies Israel and India do not have any obstacles in bribing the US politicians cutting across American party politics. A so-called democracy that permits the presidential candidates to raise sumptuous funds from billionaires, multinational corporations and oil-arms-liquor gangsters in anticipation of return favors to the donors is worse than other terrocracies.
Does US president B. Obama have a doctrine of his own that could be tested and verified? Unless he borrows the updated Pentagon-CIA doctrines for promoting US imperialism, Obama does not have any worthwhile doctrine of his own at all. Many analysts admit that if there is something to be known as Obama doctrine it is just the continuation of Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war.
The only Doctrine in modern times is the Kremlin military doctrine propounded by Russian leader Vladimir Putin which says Russia could attack any nation even without any credible threat perceptions. This doctrine comes into clash with the prevalent military doctrines existing until then (and after that in Libya) that a country could attack another nation only if there is credible threat perception. But the unilateral USA before attacking any enemy always creates the necessary background work for generating threat perceptions to enable the Pentagon and its NATO terror syndicate to invade as it happened in Afghanistan, Libya and other Muslim nations.
However, if one insists on finding one somehow because Obama, maybe for none of his own fault, is the top most leader of the globe, then, phrases like hypocrisy, double-speak, confusion, drone terrorism could easily be attributed to what could be called the Obama doctrine that is basically no so different form that of his predecessor Bush Jr. a continuation of Bushs doctrine. .
Obama doctrine is full swing in sovereign Libya where NATO terror syndicate has been in an illegal war for months, revealing their collective insanity and jungle barbarianism. Obama doctrine is in live operation in Afghanistan and Pakistan where civilians are being butchered by high precision drones and terror machines.
Terror wars and uprisings have been gainfully employed by the CIA to advance US interests. Had USA and terror allies declared the establishment or forcing of Islamic law in Muslim nations that would have made some sense, after all, Muslim nations just ignore Islam even while bulk of Muslim nations practice certain rituals for the sake of them as a mere formality. Any insistence on the part of USA for Islamic rule in these Arab nations would have produced positive results, because these nations are being controlled by Washington and its European allies and are in fact scared of implementing Islam in true spirits.
But the western terrocracies under NATO terror syndicates are focused on the resources and flesh-blood of Muslim nations and they seek regime change only to put in place puppet regimes, as they have already done in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and now killing Libyans and looting oil only to enact a puppet regime in Tripoli.
TWO
What happens behind closed doors and inside the democracy facade is a different matter. Politics has for at least 60 years been the pregenitor of fear and diversion. Fear as in the them & us policies of the Cold War and now without that, fear of terrorism, of the world economy even Global environment change is there to be used by the clever. Diversion as is mentioned above by the Demonization of political opposition to manipulate the masses and continue the fear principle. The Tea party members also playing the game within the game promoting US imperialist trends, being just the reverse side of the same head. All this effort is for one goal only, to constantly bombard humanity into thinking that Muslims are terrorists attacking innocent western terrocracies and that it is powerless, weak, and hopeless. We little people are looked after The Big People because they are working for our best interests at heart and we are unable to do anything.
Obama was conferred the Nobel peace prize on pure speculation that as a leader of minority in USA he would strive for world peace. But his deliberate mischief was reflected in Obama's acceptance speech for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, after he authorized an escalation of the US war in Afghanistan.
Facing off then against then-fellow Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in a debate for the Democratic primary, Obama said he didn't want to just end the war in Iraq but basically to end the mind-set that got us into war in the first place. He was just bluffing. Obama has also proven to be a nasty war monger in escalating war in Afghanistan and starting a new war in Libya, killing innocent Muslims. Despite opposition from many allies and Democrats, Bush Jr invaded Iraq in 2003 bluffing that he would locate nukes there and Osama , President Obama is ensuring clear support from European and Arab states and then letting othersFrance and Britain lead the military charge.. .
Obama has convincingly shown that election is a pure stunt to capture power and poll promises and popular mandate are just parts of the poll gimmicks. Since taking office in January 2009, Barrack Obama, the man of change broke every major campaign promise. He spoke one thing but did entirely different thing, pretending to be helpless against the powerful Pentagon and CIA operations. In his Middle East major speech later in Cairo on June 4, 2009, Obama declared like film hero that Islam is not the enemy of USA and promised to cement ties with Muslim nations and pledged to help create a new era of international relations and when he returned to Washington he dispatched new troops to Afghanistan and Pakistan as part of his terror escalation strategy to kill Muslims and fired high precision drones at Pakistan, killing innocent Muslims. Later Obama embarked upon a war of different type known as uprisings in Middle East and fixed his focus on oil rich sovereign Libya.
The Obama doctrine, like that of Bushdom regime, holds warnings for Iran and North Korea, focuses on homegrown extremists who turn to Islamic radicalism in America, and warns of the dangers of nuclear proliferation. But Obama also calls for tough engagement without illusion with Iran and North Korea, but warns they face isolation if they do not throw open their nuclear programs. The document contains an evolution of Obamas pro-engagement policies after several months in power. It describes a world thick with evolving threats and seeks to reframe US foreign policy after two wars. It projects a tough, hard-nosed assessment of American interests and the use of US power, and lays out a dizzying array of threats from cyber warfare to health epidemics to ethnic wars to inequality.
On nuclear issues, Obama said he would favor elimination of nuclear weapons, but has not initiated any step towards that objective but his boys are focused on elimination of nukes of Pakistan, the only nuclear state in Islamic world and for this have been pushing for a Pak-China because basically it was China which helped Pakistan to make nukes to for deterrent purposes to defend itself from any possible Indian attack. The absence of practical steps towards complete elimination of nuclear weapons has, thus, not created anything new beyond the Bush doctrine or Obama doctrine. Obama also remains apprehensive of Iranian, North Korean, Chinese and Russian missile modernization...
All this is old stuff in a new Obama container.
This hypocrisy is indicative of Obama, it has become a pattern since he took office that he says one thing and does the opposite. Obama said he would wind up the Patriot Act but he actually strengthened the act. Obama wanted to get out of the wars but escalated the illegal war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Obama invaded sovereign Libya as his own contribution to Bushdom wars. Obama said he wants peace with Muslim nations but invaded sovereign Libya, killed Libyan Arabs and looted Libyan fine quality oil almost for free in exchange for terror goods supplied to rebel terrorists for destabilizing Libya and killing Muslims. World cannot judge Obama by his words, but must look at what he does.
THREE
America successfully promotes inequality and state terrorism to deny equality. With 1% of Americans controlling 40% of the country's wealth, one can examine the gap between the rich and the rest in this so-called largest democracy. Inequality in the US is more extreme than it has been in almost a century - and the gap between the super-rich and the poor and middle class people has widened drastically over the last 30 years.
In Washington, a bitter partisan debate over how to cut deficit spending and reduce the US' $14.3 trillion debt is underway and the bill on that might not offer any concessions. The diehard Neocon nuts continue to profess futility of concessions for less privileged sections and curbing spending on public and to promote limited expenditure on public. While the Republicans deadly against concession to poor and promote tax rebates for the rich the Democrats just promote the Republican goals. As low and middle class wages stagnate and unemployment remains above nine per cent, Republicans and Democrats are tussling over whether to slash funding for the medical and retirement programs that are the backbone of the US' social safety net, and whether to raise taxes - or to cut them further.
World took Obamas words quite seriously because of the Nobel peace award. In what could be an emerging doctrine, the US President Barack Obama in May 2011 rejected George W Bushs doctrine that made a war on terror the driving force of US power, framing a pragmatic foreign policy for a world bristling with threats. Under a new national security strategy, Obama also steps back from the former fascist presidents concept of pre-emptive war to head off looming danger, and cites national security implications of economic meltdowns and global warming.
Potential Republican presidential candidates for 2012 have now criticized the incumbent president Obama in recent days for appearing tentative and not pushing America's traditional role of international peacekeeper. That is the usual US politics of mimicry. The republicans called Obama the tar boy to be abandoned, giving new fuel to speculation that underneath much of the criticism of the Obama as president and his policies lurks the shadow of racism. This is the question of US culture. (The phrase tar baby comes from the 19th century Uncle Remus stories, where B'rer Fox uses a doll made of a lump of tar to trap B'rer Rabbit, who gets more stuck the more he pummels and kicks the tar baby.)
France which opposed US fascist attack on sovereign Iraq in 2003 as illegitimate and a show of US fanaticism, also has jointed the NATO terrorism now in Libya. In 2003, then-French President Jacques Chirac opposed Bush's drive to war in Iraq, as did Obama, who at the time was a state senator from Illinois just beginning a long-shot US Senate campaign. But now Obama asked French President Sarkozy to issue the first order of the day to strike at Libyan forces, hitherto known in western fascist media as Col. Qaddafi's forces and protect Benghazi known now as the rebel capital controlled by CIA and Libyan rebel terrorists. The first cruise-missile strikes ordered by Obama against Libya and Col. Qaddafi's air defenses, alongside their so-called cease-fire announcement, were the first major show of American force in the military campaign. Washington wanted France, Britain, Italy. Germany, Canada and other coalition partners to take responsibility for day-to-day enforcement of the no-fly zone over Libya..
FOUR
The US political parties now focused on the next Presidential poll. The budget debate and the economy are the battleground on which the 2012 presidential election race will be fought. And the US has never seemed so divided - both politically and economically. Leaders in USA are on the side of transnational corporations, arms-oil-liquor mafias that generously fund the polls and fascist ideology as being the most suited to terrocracies.
As capitalist policy, American poor have lost even the very little they thought they had, but rich has been protected with all privileges and rebates to make more profits at the cost of the rest. How did the gap grow so wide, and so quickly even under Obama, a self-confessed lefty? And how are the convictions, campaign contributions and charitable donations of the top one per cent to ruling circles impacting the other 99 per cent of Americans?
US president Obama, like his predecessors had been, is interested only in his continuation in office for a second term if not further and has been attempting to terrorize the world by escalation of illegal NATO terror wars to assert his strength as president of the top imperialist power. Obama as his very first action in office was to sanction unmanned civilian-killing drone bombings in Pakistan has vastly increased troop numbers in Afghanistan and tries to moralize about state terrorism, while the global fascist media attempt to demonize anyone who is exposing their joint terror game and the NATO tyranny for energy and political reasons. All sources of communication for humanity cause are targeted ruthlessly by CIA and allies..
Even while remaining a usual American politician of gimmicks, Obama's diplomacy has failed both abroad and at home because he is insincere. He has betrayed Americans and Africans, Arabs and non-Arabs, Whites and Blacks. Neither his allies are safe nor are his opponents happy. Both terrocracies Israel and India do not have any obstacles in bribing the US politicians cutting across American party politics. A so-called democracy that permits the presidential candidates to raise sumptuous funds from billionaires, multinational corporations and oil-arms-liquor gangsters in anticipation of return favors to the donors is worse than other terrocracies.
In Cairo in 2009, Obama sought a new beginning based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, or need be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings. It was hypocritical boilerplate. He decried the killing of innocent men, women, and children, yet US forces slaughter them daily in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Libya.
In addition, America supplies Israel with billions of dollars and the latest weapons and technology to commit slow-motion genocide against millions of Palestinians, deny their legitimate self-determination, and right of their refugees to return home as international law demands.
When Muslims and Islam are being targeted by anti-Islamic forces and their media lords and nuts, maximum Muslims who, instead of exposing CIA hidden agendas and defending humanity or facing the consequences of speaking out publicly for what they believe to be right, choose instead to hide behind anonymous log-in names to abuse and seek to undermine those with genuine guts and commitment to greater cause.
Coming back to square one, one may ask now boldly: Does US president B. Obama also have a doctrine to his escalation credit?
Obama has transformed democratically from a man of "change" into war escalator in chief.
Obama talked about threats to the American people, but do the Libyans pose any threat to Americans?
----------------
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
09 August 2011
___________________
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
___________________
Even while remaining a usual American politician of gimmicks, Obama's diplomacy has failed both abroad and at home because he is insincere. He has betrayed Americans and Africans, Arabs and non-Arabs, Whites and Blacks. Neither his allies are safe nor are his opponents happy. Both terrocracies Israel and India do not have any obstacles in bribing the US politicians cutting across American party politics. A so-called democracy that permits the presidential candidates to raise sumptuous funds from billionaires, multinational corporations and oil-arms-liquor gangsters in anticipation of return favors to the donors is worse than other terrocracies.
Does US president B. Obama have a doctrine of his own that could be tested and verified? Unless he borrows the updated Pentagon-CIA doctrines for promoting US imperialism, Obama does not have any worthwhile doctrine of his own at all. Many analysts admit that if there is something to be known as Obama doctrine it is just the continuation of Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war.
The only Doctrine in modern times is the Kremlin military doctrine propounded by Russian leader Vladimir Putin which says Russia could attack any nation even without any credible threat perceptions. This doctrine comes into clash with the prevalent military doctrines existing until then (and after that in Libya) that a country could attack another nation only if there is credible threat perception. But the unilateral USA before attacking any enemy always creates the necessary background work for generating threat perceptions to enable the Pentagon and its NATO terror syndicate to invade as it happened in Afghanistan, Libya and other Muslim nations.
However, if one insists on finding one somehow because Obama, maybe for none of his own fault, is the top most leader of the globe, then, phrases like hypocrisy, double-speak, confusion, drone terrorism could easily be attributed to what could be called the Obama doctrine that is basically no so different form that of his predecessor Bush Jr. a continuation of Bushs doctrine. .
Obama doctrine is full swing in sovereign Libya where NATO terror syndicate has been in an illegal war for months, revealing their collective insanity and jungle barbarianism. Obama doctrine is in live operation in Afghanistan and Pakistan where civilians are being butchered by high precision drones and terror machines.
Terror wars and uprisings have been gainfully employed by the CIA to advance US interests. Had USA and terror allies declared the establishment or forcing of Islamic law in Muslim nations that would have made some sense, after all, Muslim nations just ignore Islam even while bulk of Muslim nations practice certain rituals for the sake of them as a mere formality. Any insistence on the part of USA for Islamic rule in these Arab nations would have produced positive results, because these nations are being controlled by Washington and its European allies and are in fact scared of implementing Islam in true spirits.
But the western terrocracies under NATO terror syndicates are focused on the resources and flesh-blood of Muslim nations and they seek regime change only to put in place puppet regimes, as they have already done in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and now killing Libyans and looting oil only to enact a puppet regime in Tripoli.
TWO
What happens behind closed doors and inside the democracy facade is a different matter. Politics has for at least 60 years been the pregenitor of fear and diversion. Fear as in the them & us policies of the Cold War and now without that, fear of terrorism, of the world economy even Global environment change is there to be used by the clever. Diversion as is mentioned above by the Demonization of political opposition to manipulate the masses and continue the fear principle. The Tea party members also playing the game within the game promoting US imperialist trends, being just the reverse side of the same head. All this effort is for one goal only, to constantly bombard humanity into thinking that Muslims are terrorists attacking innocent western terrocracies and that it is powerless, weak, and hopeless. We little people are looked after The Big People because they are working for our best interests at heart and we are unable to do anything.
Obama was conferred the Nobel peace prize on pure speculation that as a leader of minority in USA he would strive for world peace. But his deliberate mischief was reflected in Obama's acceptance speech for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, after he authorized an escalation of the US war in Afghanistan.
Facing off then against then-fellow Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in a debate for the Democratic primary, Obama said he didn't want to just end the war in Iraq but basically to end the mind-set that got us into war in the first place. He was just bluffing. Obama has also proven to be a nasty war monger in escalating war in Afghanistan and starting a new war in Libya, killing innocent Muslims. Despite opposition from many allies and Democrats, Bush Jr invaded Iraq in 2003 bluffing that he would locate nukes there and Osama , President Obama is ensuring clear support from European and Arab states and then letting othersFrance and Britain lead the military charge.. .
Obama has convincingly shown that election is a pure stunt to capture power and poll promises and popular mandate are just parts of the poll gimmicks. Since taking office in January 2009, Barrack Obama, the man of change broke every major campaign promise. He spoke one thing but did entirely different thing, pretending to be helpless against the powerful Pentagon and CIA operations. In his Middle East major speech later in Cairo on June 4, 2009, Obama declared like film hero that Islam is not the enemy of USA and promised to cement ties with Muslim nations and pledged to help create a new era of international relations and when he returned to Washington he dispatched new troops to Afghanistan and Pakistan as part of his terror escalation strategy to kill Muslims and fired high precision drones at Pakistan, killing innocent Muslims. Later Obama embarked upon a war of different type known as uprisings in Middle East and fixed his focus on oil rich sovereign Libya.
The Obama doctrine, like that of Bushdom regime, holds warnings for Iran and North Korea, focuses on homegrown extremists who turn to Islamic radicalism in America, and warns of the dangers of nuclear proliferation. But Obama also calls for tough engagement without illusion with Iran and North Korea, but warns they face isolation if they do not throw open their nuclear programs. The document contains an evolution of Obamas pro-engagement policies after several months in power. It describes a world thick with evolving threats and seeks to reframe US foreign policy after two wars. It projects a tough, hard-nosed assessment of American interests and the use of US power, and lays out a dizzying array of threats from cyber warfare to health epidemics to ethnic wars to inequality.
On nuclear issues, Obama said he would favor elimination of nuclear weapons, but has not initiated any step towards that objective but his boys are focused on elimination of nukes of Pakistan, the only nuclear state in Islamic world and for this have been pushing for a Pak-China because basically it was China which helped Pakistan to make nukes to for deterrent purposes to defend itself from any possible Indian attack. The absence of practical steps towards complete elimination of nuclear weapons has, thus, not created anything new beyond the Bush doctrine or Obama doctrine. Obama also remains apprehensive of Iranian, North Korean, Chinese and Russian missile modernization...
All this is old stuff in a new Obama container.
This hypocrisy is indicative of Obama, it has become a pattern since he took office that he says one thing and does the opposite. Obama said he would wind up the Patriot Act but he actually strengthened the act. Obama wanted to get out of the wars but escalated the illegal war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Obama invaded sovereign Libya as his own contribution to Bushdom wars. Obama said he wants peace with Muslim nations but invaded sovereign Libya, killed Libyan Arabs and looted Libyan fine quality oil almost for free in exchange for terror goods supplied to rebel terrorists for destabilizing Libya and killing Muslims. World cannot judge Obama by his words, but must look at what he does.
THREE
America successfully promotes inequality and state terrorism to deny equality. With 1% of Americans controlling 40% of the country's wealth, one can examine the gap between the rich and the rest in this so-called largest democracy. Inequality in the US is more extreme than it has been in almost a century - and the gap between the super-rich and the poor and middle class people has widened drastically over the last 30 years.
In Washington, a bitter partisan debate over how to cut deficit spending and reduce the US' $14.3 trillion debt is underway and the bill on that might not offer any concessions. The diehard Neocon nuts continue to profess futility of concessions for less privileged sections and curbing spending on public and to promote limited expenditure on public. While the Republicans deadly against concession to poor and promote tax rebates for the rich the Democrats just promote the Republican goals. As low and middle class wages stagnate and unemployment remains above nine per cent, Republicans and Democrats are tussling over whether to slash funding for the medical and retirement programs that are the backbone of the US' social safety net, and whether to raise taxes - or to cut them further.
World took Obamas words quite seriously because of the Nobel peace award. In what could be an emerging doctrine, the US President Barack Obama in May 2011 rejected George W Bushs doctrine that made a war on terror the driving force of US power, framing a pragmatic foreign policy for a world bristling with threats. Under a new national security strategy, Obama also steps back from the former fascist presidents concept of pre-emptive war to head off looming danger, and cites national security implications of economic meltdowns and global warming.
Potential Republican presidential candidates for 2012 have now criticized the incumbent president Obama in recent days for appearing tentative and not pushing America's traditional role of international peacekeeper. That is the usual US politics of mimicry. The republicans called Obama the tar boy to be abandoned, giving new fuel to speculation that underneath much of the criticism of the Obama as president and his policies lurks the shadow of racism. This is the question of US culture. (The phrase tar baby comes from the 19th century Uncle Remus stories, where B'rer Fox uses a doll made of a lump of tar to trap B'rer Rabbit, who gets more stuck the more he pummels and kicks the tar baby.)
France which opposed US fascist attack on sovereign Iraq in 2003 as illegitimate and a show of US fanaticism, also has jointed the NATO terrorism now in Libya. In 2003, then-French President Jacques Chirac opposed Bush's drive to war in Iraq, as did Obama, who at the time was a state senator from Illinois just beginning a long-shot US Senate campaign. But now Obama asked French President Sarkozy to issue the first order of the day to strike at Libyan forces, hitherto known in western fascist media as Col. Qaddafi's forces and protect Benghazi known now as the rebel capital controlled by CIA and Libyan rebel terrorists. The first cruise-missile strikes ordered by Obama against Libya and Col. Qaddafi's air defenses, alongside their so-called cease-fire announcement, were the first major show of American force in the military campaign. Washington wanted France, Britain, Italy. Germany, Canada and other coalition partners to take responsibility for day-to-day enforcement of the no-fly zone over Libya..
FOUR
The US political parties now focused on the next Presidential poll. The budget debate and the economy are the battleground on which the 2012 presidential election race will be fought. And the US has never seemed so divided - both politically and economically. Leaders in USA are on the side of transnational corporations, arms-oil-liquor mafias that generously fund the polls and fascist ideology as being the most suited to terrocracies.
As capitalist policy, American poor have lost even the very little they thought they had, but rich has been protected with all privileges and rebates to make more profits at the cost of the rest. How did the gap grow so wide, and so quickly even under Obama, a self-confessed lefty? And how are the convictions, campaign contributions and charitable donations of the top one per cent to ruling circles impacting the other 99 per cent of Americans?
US president Obama, like his predecessors had been, is interested only in his continuation in office for a second term if not further and has been attempting to terrorize the world by escalation of illegal NATO terror wars to assert his strength as president of the top imperialist power. Obama as his very first action in office was to sanction unmanned civilian-killing drone bombings in Pakistan has vastly increased troop numbers in Afghanistan and tries to moralize about state terrorism, while the global fascist media attempt to demonize anyone who is exposing their joint terror game and the NATO tyranny for energy and political reasons. All sources of communication for humanity cause are targeted ruthlessly by CIA and allies..
Even while remaining a usual American politician of gimmicks, Obama's diplomacy has failed both abroad and at home because he is insincere. He has betrayed Americans and Africans, Arabs and non-Arabs, Whites and Blacks. Neither his allies are safe nor are his opponents happy. Both terrocracies Israel and India do not have any obstacles in bribing the US politicians cutting across American party politics. A so-called democracy that permits the presidential candidates to raise sumptuous funds from billionaires, multinational corporations and oil-arms-liquor gangsters in anticipation of return favors to the donors is worse than other terrocracies.
In Cairo in 2009, Obama sought a new beginning based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, or need be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings. It was hypocritical boilerplate. He decried the killing of innocent men, women, and children, yet US forces slaughter them daily in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Libya.
In addition, America supplies Israel with billions of dollars and the latest weapons and technology to commit slow-motion genocide against millions of Palestinians, deny their legitimate self-determination, and right of their refugees to return home as international law demands.
When Muslims and Islam are being targeted by anti-Islamic forces and their media lords and nuts, maximum Muslims who, instead of exposing CIA hidden agendas and defending humanity or facing the consequences of speaking out publicly for what they believe to be right, choose instead to hide behind anonymous log-in names to abuse and seek to undermine those with genuine guts and commitment to greater cause.
Coming back to square one, one may ask now boldly: Does US president B. Obama also have a doctrine to his escalation credit?
Obama has transformed democratically from a man of "change" into war escalator in chief.
Obama talked about threats to the American people, but do the Libyans pose any threat to Americans?
----------------
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
09 August 2011
___________________
