Some of those incidents were caught on video. Who of them got punished to-date ? Why haven't the perpetrators been punished to-date ? Hasn't MQM been in power ?
Why doesn't it take those people to court who it thinks have committed crimes against their people ?
Answer my questions please. Show us the indication that you are a 'civilized' person. Show us the indication that you;
(1) are not unjust
(2) don't support criminals
(3) not a propagandist
Whatever I'v seen from you on multiple forums to-date, I am forced to confirm you are a consistent propagandist. You support criminals, without any reservation. You are unjust. You are not ready to accept justice.
1) Is case of Money laundering of Nawaz Sharif not in court?
2) Is case of ISI giving illegal money to Nawaz Sharif, Jamaat-e-Islami not in court?
Why court are not hearing these important cases?
MQM filed case against govt in 1995.
It is still in court. Lot of time reminder has been given to court in this regard.
Below are the brief detail of the case.
http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studie ... 0Ap95.html
ISLAMABAD, April 17: Supreme Court on Monday gave two more months to
Attorney General of Pakistan to file a reply in the petition of Mohajir
Qaumi Movement (MQM) against the Federation of Pakistan and Provincial
Government of Sindh.
The Court fixed June 6, 1995, as the next date of hearing, acceding to
the request of the Attorney General who had prayed for grant of at least
a period of two months for filing reply of the federation and the
government of Sindh.
He informed the court that two people had been working in Karachi and
two in Islamabad to draft the Government's response in the case.
The
petition was filed by MQM on January 17, 1995.
Dr Farooq Hassan, who appeared before the court on behalf of the
petitioner, Senator Ishtiaq Azhar, said that
the court in its order of
January 17, 1995, had observed that matter should be taken up for
hearing in a period of two months on mutually agreeable date.
Mr Hassan said that after expiry of two months period a letter was sent
to Attorney General reminding him of the order of the court. He said
there was no response from the Attorney General to the letter after
which another letter was written to the Registrar of the Supreme Court
describing the situation and requested for the fixation of the case even
if the Government did not file its response.
On an inquiry from the Chief Justice why there was urgency in this
matter, the petitioner's counsel said that the MQM was an important
political party. He said respondents had restricted functioning of MQM,
which had resulted in violation of several fundamental rights of the
petitioner specially under Article 17 of the Constitution.
The MQM petition which was spread over hundred of pages had also
contained the details of atrocities and genocide committed by the
respondents making it liable before the law of the land and
international laws as well.
The petition has evoked international
interest and Harvard Law School has included the petition as course
material in the human rights courses.