What is the difference between Asif Zardari and Imran Khan?

Adonis

Banned
We know that Asif Zardari breached the written agreement of restoration of judiciary with PMLN; Similarly, Imran Khan also breached a written agreement with the government that PTI will not enter into red zone; The question arises then what is the difference between the two? It means that Zardari was right that political agreements are not Quran or Hadith and Imran khan is in agreement with Zardari.
 

jagga9

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
lol lol lol lol lol


hahhahhahhahahhaahahhahaahhaahhahha

***** ho gaye hain GEO walay
 

Asad Khan

MPA (400+ posts)
Agreement with a government? The key word here is 'government'. When the basic question is about the legitimacy of the government itself, especially moral legitimacy, I as no expert on its legality can certainly understand its non-existent ethical justification. With apologies to Thomas Jefferson, 'If a contract is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so'. Unless contracts come with a fine print, one liner contracts are hard to stick to owing to the fluidity of the situation. Eventually, no contract can stand the tide of popular views irrespective of its legality within a context since in a democracy the very justification of a law stems from the aspirations of the people itself.
 

Adonis

Banned
Agreement with a government? The key word here is 'government'. When the basic question is about the legitimacy of the government itself, especially moral legitimacy, I as no expert on its legality can certainly understand its non-existent ethical justification. With apologies to Thomas Jefferson, 'If a contract is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so'. Unless contracts come with a fine print, one liner contracts are hard to stick to owing to the fluidity of the situation. Eventually, no contract can stand the tide of popular views irrespective of its legality within a context since in a democracy the very justification of a law stems from the aspirations of the people itself.

If the government does not have any moral authority then what is point to have written agreement with it?
 

Adonis

Banned
hhahahhahahahha

GEO Walo . koi haal nahi tum logon ka.

Becharay nawaz sharef ko bhi ragaR dia..... aaj banned outfits ko bhi support ker dia aur maulana diesel ko bhi .....

shabash kiraye k marasio


You are exposing yourself by not answering the question; carry on (yapping)
 

handsome.ebi

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

محترم! جس زرداری کو سڑکوں پر گھسیٹ کر کھمبوں سے لٹکانا تھا آج اسے ظہرانے پر بلایا جا رہا ہے - اس سے بڑا وعدا نبھانا اور کیا ہوگا
;)
 

Adonis

Banned

محترم! جس زرداری کو سڑکوں پر گھسیٹ کر کھمبوں سے لٹکانا تھا آج اسے ظہرانے پر بلایا جا رہا ہے - اس سے بڑا وعدا نبھانا اور کیا ہوگا
;)


Your comment has nothing to do with my question; You can start a news thread on misdeeds of NS; you are a free man
 

Asad Khan

MPA (400+ posts)
@ Pathan: For a very simple, commonsensical reason: to ensure the safety of the people and to reduce the likely hood of clash which could have most likely resulted in bloodshed. Is it that hard to get Mr AkalMand Pathan, don't get mad I am pathan too on a lighter note. End does at times justifies the means bro. If Zardari's reneging on his words saved people lives then, it should be commended but if that was purely for cynical reasons then you are trying to compare apples with oranges.
 

handsome.ebi

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Your comment has nothing to do with my question; You can start a news thread on misdeeds of NS; you are a free man


آپکے سوال کا جواب بھی حاضر ہے - اگر خان لوگوں کو پرامن طریقے سے ریڈ زون میں نہ لیکر جاتا تو انہوں نے خد گھسنے کی کوشش کرنی تھی ایسی صورت میں خون خرابہ ہونا تھا - اگر ایک بڑے نقصان سے بچنے کے لئے وعدہ توڑنا پڑے تو اسمیں کوئی مضائقہ نہی

 

handsome.ebi

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
@ Pathan: For a very simple, commonsensical reason: to ensure the safety of the people and to reduce the likely hood of clash which could have most likely resulted in bloodshed. Is it that hard to get Mr AkalMand Pathan, don't get mad I am pathan too on a lighter note. End does at times justifies the means bro. If Zardari's reneging on his words saved people lives then, it should be commended but if that was purely for cynical reasons then you are trying to compare apples with oranges.

bilkul shi kha ha apne, koi bhi wada logon ki jano se qeemti nhi hoota..
 

Adonis

Banned
@ Pathan: For a very simple, commonsensical reason: to ensure the safety of the people and to reduce the likely hood of clash which could have most likely resulted in bloodshed. Is it that hard to get Mr AkalMand Pathan, don't get mad I am pathan too on a lighter note. End does at times justifies the means bro. If Zardari's reneging on his words saved people lives then, it should be commended but if that was purely for cynical reasons then you are trying to compare apples with oranges.

Its your right to say apples as oranges but I am comparing apples with apples; I think you need to first check what Imran Khan said when he breached the agreement; Your explanation is 180 degree to that of Imran Khan
 

handsome.ebi

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
@ Pathan: For a very simple, commonsensical reason: to ensure the safety of the people and to reduce the likely hood of clash which could have most likely resulted in bloodshed. Is it that hard to get Mr AkalMand Pathan, don't get mad I am pathan too on a lighter note. End does at times justifies the means bro. If Zardari's reneging on his words saved people lives then, it should be commended but if that was purely for cynical reasons then you are trying to compare apples with oranges.

bilkul shi kha ha apne, koi bhi wada logon ki jano se qeemti nhi hoota..
 

Sniper

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
We know that Asif Zardari breached the written agreement of restoration of judiciary with PMLN; Similarly, Imran Khan also breached a written agreement with the government that PTI will not enter into red zone; The question arises then what is the difference between the two? It means that Zardari was right that political agreements are not Quran or Hadith and Imran khan is in agreement with Zardari.

Zardai haramkhoor hai or Imran Khan aik clean banda hai. Feel the difference!
 

Nice2MU

President (40k+ posts)
Where was agreement? Atleast I didn't see any written agreement. If you have plz share it here. I am not gona trust any N-League Liar.
 

Sniper

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
We know that Asif Zardari breached the written agreement of restoration of judiciary with PMLN; Similarly, Imran Khan also breached a written agreement with the government that PTI will not enter into red zone; The question arises then what is the difference between the two? It means that Zardari was right that political agreements are not Quran or Hadith and Imran khan is in agreement with Zardari.

Imran Khan ka government Kay sath agreement tou dekhao???
 

Adonis

Banned

آپکے سوال کا جواب بھی حاضر ہے - اگر خان لوگوں کو پرامن طریقے سے ریڈ زون میں نہ لیکر جاتا تو انہوں نے خد گھسنے کی کوشش کرنی تھی ایسی صورت میں خون خرابہ ہونا تھا - اگر ایک بڑے نقصان سے بچنے کے لئے وعدہ توڑنا پڑے تو اسمیں کوئی مضائقہ نہی

one; it

Please read the question first; he breached the agreement that he will not enter the red zone; he broke the promise and enter the red zone; it was government who behaved sensibly and there was no bloodshed otherwise with IK breaking the promise there was every chance of bloodshed