[MENTION=27148]Sedqal[/MENTION] ... Bhai jan ... if you plan to debate ... at least get your facts straight ... So do you want me to start naming names now of the people who have switched parties and joined PML-N ... Come on buddy ... don't be a hypocrite ... Remember when you are pointing a finger towards the other ... 4 of your fingers are pointing back towards you. Do you really want me to remind you of the PML-N history and how it was formed? Why are you so much worried about PTI workers ... give me the name of one PML-N worker who the Sharif Bros. have boosted to a national level position... It is all within the family. You know that quite well too however you are forced to defend him either because you yourself are somehow related to him or you are getting some sort of carrot just like few other friends of yours. Why don't you name me one close relative of Imran in PTI's high level leadership? If you want to debate something that bring facts ... show what have your leaders done when in power either federally or provincially to change the lives of common folk ... Absolutely nothing... These moronic leaders of yours think they can buy votes by distributing laptops from our tax paid money ... then they are so very wrong. Even if you a little bit of conscience and love for your country, I would recommend reading a leading authority Raymond Baker's book Capitalism - Achilles Heel in case you have any doubts about the corruption of the status quo parties including the one you are supporting... Just to make this a bit more easier for you ... Here's a portion from that book for your reading pleasure. Remember Google is your friend.
Raymond Baker in his book
Capitalisms Achilles Heel: Dirty Money and How to Renew the Free-Market System tried to understand the dynamics of how dirty money works.
Corruption and criminality run from the top down, with the political class constantly looting the national treasury and distorting economic policy for personal gain. Bank loans are granted largely on the basis of status and connections. The rich stash much of their money abroad in those willing western coffers, while exhibiting little inclination to repay their rupee borrowings. Pakistans recent history has been dominated by two familiesthe Bhuttos and the Sharifsboth merely tolerated by the military, the real power in the country. When it comes to economic destruction, theres not a lot of difference among the three.
Pages 82-85 of the book cover the section on Nawaz Sharif: While Benazir Bhutto hated the generals for executing her father, Nawaz Sharif early on figured out that they held the real power in Pakistan. His father had established a foundry in 1939 and, together with six brothers, had struggled for years only to see their business nationalized by Ali Bhuttos regime in 1972. This sealed decades of enmity between the Bhuttos and the Sharifs. Following the military coup and General Zias assumption of power, the businessIttefaqwas returned to family hands in 1980.
Nawaz Sharif became a director and cultivated relations with senior military officers. This led to his appointment as finance minister of Punjab and then election as chief minister of this most populous province in 1985. During the 1980s and early 1990s, given Sharif s political control of Punjab and eventual prime ministership of the country,
Ittefaq Industries grew from its original single foundry into 30 businesses producing steel, sugar, paper, and textiles, with combined revenues of $400 million, making it one of the biggest private conglomerates in the nation. As in many other countries, when you control the political realm, you can get anything you want in the economic realm.
With Lahore, the capital of Punjab, serving as the seat of the familys power, one of the first things Sharif did upon becoming prime minister in 1990 was build his long-dreamed-of
superhighway from there to the capital,Islamabad. Estimated to cost 8.5 billion rupees, the project went through two biddings. Daewoo of Korea, strengthening its proposals with midnight meetings, was the highest bidder both times, so obviously it won the contract and
delivered the job at well over 20 billion rupees.
A new highway needs new cars.
Sharif authorized importation of 50,000 vehicles duty free, reportedly costing the government $700 million in lost customs duties. Banks were forced to make loans for vehicle purchases to would-be taxi cab drivers upon receipt of a 10 percent deposit.
Borrowers got their Nawaz Sharif cabs, and some 60 percent of them promptly defaulted.
This left the banks with $500 million or so in unpaid loans. Vehicle dealers reportedly made a killing and expressed their appreciation in expected ways. Under Sharif, unpaid bank loans and massive tax evasion remained the favorite ways to get rich.
Upon his loss of power the usurping government published a list of 322 of the largest loan defaulters, representing almost $3 billion out of $4 billion owed to banks. Sharif and his family were tagged for $60 million. The Ittefaq Group went bankrupt in 1993 when Sharif lost his premiership the first time. By then only
three units in the group were operational, and loan defaults of the remaining companies totaled some 5.7 billion rupees, more than $100 million.
Like Bhutto,
offshore companies have been linked to Sharif, three in the British Virgin Islands by the names of Nescoll, Nielson, and Shamrock and another in the Channel Islands known as Chandron Jersey Pvt. Ltd. Some of these entities allegedly were used to facilitate purchase of four rather grand flats on Park Lane in London, at various times occupied by Sharif family members. Reportedly, payment transfers were made to Banque Paribas en Suisse, which then instructed Sharif s offshore companies Nescoll and Nielson to purchase the four luxury suites.
In her second term, Benazir Bhutto had Pakistans Federal Investigating Agency begin a probe into the financial affairs of Nawaz Sharif and his family.
The probe was headed by Rehman Malik, deputy director general of the agency.
Malik had fortified his reputation earlier by aiding in the arrest of Ramzi Yousef, mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. During Sharif s second term, the draft report of the investigation was suppressed, Malik was jailed for a year, and later reportedly survived an assassination attempt, after which he fled to London. The Malik report, five years in the making, was released in 1998, with explosive revelations:
The records, including government documents, signed affidavits from Pakistani officials, bank files and property records, detail deals that Mr. Malik says benefited Mr. Sharif, his family and his political associates:
- At least $160 million pocketed from a contract to build a highway from Lahore, his home town, to Islamabad, the nations capital.
- At least $140 million in unsecured loans from Pakistans state banks.
- More than $60 million generated from government rebates on sugar exported by millscontrolled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates.
- At least $58 million skimmed from inflated prices paid for imported wheat from the United States and Canada. In the wheat deal, Mr. Sharif s government paid prices far above market value to a private company owned by a close associate of his in Washington, the records show. Falsely inflated invoices for the wheat generated tens of millions of dollars in cash.
The report went on to state that
The extent and magnitude of this corruption is so staggering that it has put the very integrity of the country at stake. In an interview, Malik added:
No other leader of Pakistan has taken that much money from the banks. There is no rule of law in Pakistan. It doesnt exist.
What brought Sharif down in his second term was his attempt to acquire virtually dictatorial powers. In 1997 he rammed a bill through his compliant parliament requiring legislators to vote as their party leaders directed.
In 1998 he introduced a bill to impose Sharia law (Muslim religious law) across Pakistan, with himself empowered to issue unilateral directives in the name of Islam. In 1999 he sought to sideline the army by replacing Chief of Staff Pervez Musharraf with a more pliable crony. He forgot the lessons he had learned in the 1980s: The army controls Pakistan and politicians are a nuisance. As Musharraf was returning from Sri Lanka, Sharif tried to sack him in midair and deny the Pakistan International Airways flight with 200 civilians on board landing rights in Karachi. Musharraf radioed from the aircraft through Dubai to his commander in Karachi, ordering him to seize the airport control tower, accomplished as the plane descended almost out of fuel. Musharraf turned the tables and completed his coup, and Sharif was jailed.
But Sharif had little to fear. This, after all, is Pakistan. Musharraf needed to consolidate his power with the generals, and
Sharif knew details about the corruption of most of the brass. Obviously, it is better to tread lightly around the edges of your peer groups own thievery. So Musharraf had Sharif probed, tried, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison, but then in 2000 exiled him to Saudi Arabia.
Twenty-two containers of carpets and furniture followed, and, of course, his foreign accounts remained mostly intact. Ensconced in a glittering palace in Jeddah, he is described as looking corpulent amidst opulent surroundings. Reportedly, he and Benazir Bhutto even have an occasional telephone conversation, perhaps together lamenting how unfair life has become
At least he does not have a history of jumping party platforms. What about SMQ - he was in PMLN, PPP now PTI! PTI is now about 17 years old so it has a cadre of loyal workers, why are they being ignored for such a critical position?
It is a negative thing that Safdar is appointed at this post, no one denys it but on the other hand every other party is operating in the same way. Criticizing PMLN specifically for appointing relatives makes sense only if its the only party doing that. (JI and MQM are the only parties in Pakistan who don't indulge in this)