Microsoft ditches Windows Live Messenger for Skype

MisterX

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
Microsoft has announced it intends to "retire" its instant message chat tool and replace it with Skype's messaging tool.
The news comes 18 months after the software giant announced it was paying $8.5bn (5.3bn) for the communications software developer.
Microsoft said Windows Live Messenger (WLM) would be turned off by March 2013 worldwide, with the exception of China.
It reflects the firm's determination to focus its efforts on Skype.
WLM launched in 1999 when it was known as MSN Messenger. Over time, photo delivery, video calls and games were added to the package's text-based messages.

In 2009, the firm said it had 330 million active users.
Chat 'cannibalisation' According to internet analysis firm Comscore, WLM still had more than double the number of Skype's instant messenger facility at the start of this year and was second only in popularity to Yahoo Messenger.
But the report suggested WLM's US audience had fallen to 8.3 million unique users, representing a 48% drop year-on-year. By contrast, the number of people using Skype to instant message each other grew over the period.
"When a company has competing products that can result in cannibalisation it's often better to focus on a single one," said Brian Blau from the consultancy Gartner.
"Skype's top-up services offer the chance to monetise its users and Microsoft is also looking towards opportunities in the living room.
_63971840_skype.png
Skype is offering a tool to migrate users WLM contacts to its service
"Messenger doesn't seem like an appropriate communications platform for TVs or the firm's Xbox console - but Skype does."
He also noted that the firm had opted to integrate Skype into its new Windows Phone 8 smartphone software, eclipsing the effort to integrate WLM into the message threads of the operating system' previous version.
To ease the changeover, Microsoft is offering a tool to migrate WLM messenger contacts over.
The risk is that the move encourages users to switch instead to rival platforms such as WhatsApp Messenger, AIM or Google Talk.
But Microsoft is at least partially protected by its tie-up with Facebook last year. Skype video calls are now offered as an extra to the social network's own instant messaging tool.
 

insaf-seeker

Minister (2k+ posts)
A businessman never competes with its own products, MSN was a competitor of Skype, but skype has more users worldwide so microsoft had to retire from MSN.
 

Tsunami

MPA (400+ posts)
A businessman never competes with its own products, MSN was a competitor of Skype, but skype has more users worldwide so microsoft had to retire from MSN.

What about Pantene Anti dandruff and Head & Shoulders? Both are available at the same price and placed at the same shelf to compete with each other. While, both belong to the same company.
 

insaf-seeker

Minister (2k+ posts)
What about Pantene Anti dandruff and Head & Shoulders? Both are available at the same price and placed at the same shelf to compete with each other. While, both belong to the same company.

All the cosmetic products you have mentioned claim to have different purpose and ingredients, they are equally in demand by consumers. Whereas MSN was offering same services as skype and they were losing its user base against skype, then why to keep extra burden in the form of MSN?
 

Tsunami

MPA (400+ posts)
All the cosmetic products you have mentioned claim to have different purpose and ingredients, they are equally in demand by consumers. Whereas MSN was offering same services as skype and they were losing its user base against skype, then why to keep extra burden in the form of MSN?


I wish you had a little knowledge about creating monopoly in the market. Buy ‘A’ or buy’ B’, it is only me. We call it shelf space occupying strategy. Not all 330 million users of MSN will straight away start using Skype. A lot of them will opt for G.Talk, Yahoo, and other messenger services.
Its a serious strategic mistake, MSN should continue and let the users decide if they need MSN or not. Nonoperational accounts are expired automatically after certain period, so you don’t need to close them.
 

insaf-seeker

Minister (2k+ posts)
I wish you had a little knowledge about creating monopoly in the market. Buy ‘A’ or buy’ B’, it is only me. We call it shelf space occupying strategy. Not all 330 million users of MSN will straight away start using Skype. A lot of them will opt for G.Talk, Yahoo, and other messenger services.
Its a serious strategic mistake, MSN should continue and let the users decide if they need MSN or not. Nonoperational accounts are expired automatically after certain period, so you don’t need to close them.


I wish you had a little knowledge of the IT domain, Microsoft was not earning from MSN as much as they were spending on it. It isn't a paid service its just a free service, you need a better exposure to contemporary marketing strategies rather than just a book knowledge!!
 
Last edited:

Imranpak

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Skype, messenger or MSN?/

Amongst skype, yahoo messenger and MSN what do member here use and consider the best form of communication. I use all three but prefer skype as can see other person too.

Only thing is many seem to have technical problems with it.
 

khan27

Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: Skype, messenger or MSN?/

2013 mein windows live messenger khatam ho jaega skype will take over..u will able to login on skye with WLM id
 

Back
Top