If we go by tone and voice then we can say that ZH maybe feels that way about the politicians, ofcourse that is not acceptable but atleast it is a fair way of thinking on the grounds of feelings.
I do not think that the whole blame can be placed on the Army. Yes Army has made mistakes and got involved in politics,it should not have happened. having said that we have to understand that each time Army came to power it was welcomed by the politicians, thus encouraging the Army so they are also responsible.ta
Now that there is a civilian government in power it becomes their responsibility to hold each department and institution accountable, this can not be an excuse that Army is more powerful and all the politicians are scared of them. If that is the case then the politicians should resign stating that Army does not obey them.
Either the politicians take responsibility for the actions of the Army, or they have to accept that they can not run the government. My point is what are the leaders trying to do?
They are creating confusion. In the time of the flood the president was vacationing in France, was it not his responsibility to lead the nation and provide them with support and encouragement for the tough times?
Under the constitution Army is under the control of the government and the government will get the credit for the good and take responsibility for the incompetence. The govt. can fire the army chief or Air chief or hold a trial. Do remember that the joint session of the parliament was requested by the Army not the government.