Aql-e-qul admitted that he is doing advisor job for PM

[Aik_Sawal]

so justice speaker you agree with afzal khan statement on rigging against your zionist leader nawaz

wtf?? how is nawaz a zionist? I missed that, so please kindly explain that to me.



or are you joking, in which case - [hilar]

 

[handsome.ebi]

Ooooh Pootians, :doh: :doh:, everyone is fair and dandy until they disagree with you.. .

Then all of a sudden they are evil personified...

What a lovely standard for evaluating things...

apko apke islamiyat ki teacher ki qasam imandari se batana yeh munafqat nhi he?????

 

[Aik_Sawal]

apko apke islamiyat ki teacher ki qasam imandari se batana yeh munafqat nhi he?????

Islamiyat teacher asked me to say this to you: I don't worship Talat and not his spokesperson but what is the munafaqat here?

 

[handsome.ebi]

Islamiyat teacher asked me to say this to you: I don't worship Talat and not his spokesperson but what is the munafaqat here?

angreezi hamari kamzoor he or samajh apko nhi aa rhi :lol:
aik taraf kahta he america ja kar apna kam kare or doosri taraf kahta he khan dunya se larna chahta he ? ??
why he cant say to the the world mind their own business???

 

[Aik_Sawal]

angreezi hamari kamzoor he or samajh apko nhi aa rhi :lol:
aik taraf kahta he america ja kar apna kam kare or doosri taraf kahta he khan dunya se larna chahta he ? ??
why he cant say to the the world mind their own business???

Beth Jones said in mid-July that PTI dharna won't hurt anything so let it happen as it is a right. (Talat disagrees with dharna so that's why he said the negative thing to Beth Jones statement).


Richard Olson said on 21st Aug that US supports democratically elected govt. (and by now situation was tense) (Talat is against dharna and in support of constitutional measures so he agreed with that statement).



In both these statements, you can feel that he is against the dharna due to its hideen sinister script he feels that exists, and in favour of constitutional methods of govt. change.



If you relax and read carefully and follow current affairs then you will understand.



If you've got your pootian blinders on, and just copy / pasting stuff from here and there, then you will not understand it.



Whether you agree with Talat or not, both these statements are consistent and he hasn't changed his opposition of dharna-fasad and favour of constitutional measures.

 

[Aik_Sawal]

angreezi hamari kamzoor he or samajh apko nhi aa rhi :lol:
aik taraf kahta he america ja kar apna kam kare or doosri taraf kahta he khan dunya se larna chahta he ? ??
why he cant say to the the world mind their own business???

in other words:




If you say yes to a positive and a no to a negative then you are effectively doing the same thing. No munafaqat in that case.




Talat tweeted yes to Olson's statement of supporting democratically elected govt.



but...



he said no to the negative of unconstitutional agenda of a dharna,



so...



he's saying the same thing in both cases. No munafiqat here.

 

[Usama Tayyab]

yup he is Adviser of PM

 

[handsome.ebi]

Beth Jones said in mid-July that PTI dharna won't hurt anything so let it happen as it is a right. (Talat disagrees with dharna so that's why he said the negative thing to Beth Jones statement).


Richard Olson said on 21st Aug that US supports democratically elected govt. (and by now situation was tense) (Talat is against dharna and in support of constitutional measures so he agreed with that statement).



In both these statements, you can feel that he is against the dharna due to its hideen sinister script he feels that exists, and in favour of constitutional methods of govt. change.



If you relax and read carefully and follow current affairs then you will understand.



If you've got your pootian blinders on, and just copy / pasting stuff from here and there, then you will not understand it.



Whether you agree with Talat or not, both these statements are consistent and he hasn't changed his opposition of dharna-fasad and favour of constitutional measures.

oh acha to yeh bat he ..
talat sahab ko kal express news mein non league ki rally ke bare mein kahte suna ke yeh power game he is mein fasle aise hi hoote hein, pti per sarkon per fasle karane ki politics per khul ke tanqeed karne ke bad non ki rally ke bara mein aisa kahna doghle pun ki azeem misal he, ayeen ke alam bardar mhtaram jinab sayad talat hussain sahab ki taraf se mdl town ke sanehe ki report ke bare mein aik tweet bhi nhi, pti ke uturns ke bare mein asman sir pe uthane wala talat zardari nawaz mulaqat jaise tareekhi uturn ko jamhuri quwaton ka yakja hona kah rha tha :lol:
ap ka bhi qasoor nhi imran bughaz mein ap aisi batein nhi dekh sakte ;)

 

[Amal]

Ooooh Pootians, :doh: :doh:, everyone is fair and dandy until they disagree with you.. .


Then all of a sudden they are evil personified...

What a lovely standard for evaluating things...

qatilon , zalimon , lottaron or rashion ka sath deny waly akhrat main bee un k sath hon gey in sha Allah !

 

[desan]

It will take a while before he will get back his credibility back, if ever....

 

[arafay]

how can media persons be advisers to government on political issues. I guess this can only happen in pakistan.

 

[amir_ali]

wtf?? how is nawaz a zionist? I missed that, so please kindly explain that to me.



or are you joking, in which case - [hilar]

He is right, every one against IK is Zionist as well as Nazi, soon wajib ul qatal fatwa would be out as well, repent your sins.