Oh please Ive seen some very "intelligent" and full of "etiquettes" act like complete jahils during these manazras.
Are you saying engineer mirza is jahil or mufti tariq masood? my opinion is neither they both can sit down on terms and set an example on how a debate is done. There are thousands of debates that go well, if debates dont matter than all muslims debating on religion with christians, hindues should stop as well.
Your argument is flawed you are using examples of manazara that turns bad.
And what we are doing is no different than releasing videos, I say my fill, you read, comprehend and then post your reply. Even then this line of communication even with the most civil breaks downs into complete jahilpuna on many occasions.
disagree with you, we are discussing, the only difference is we are not face too face.
I don't know what these moulvis and yours obsession or insistence of manazras is, maybe because this is the only way they know and have been taught. This is the digital age of social media and this is how things are done now. Take it or leave it
so how is done A is bad, B is bad, C is bad and i am right but i will not discuss with others. If that is the way of the world i will use the same method with you from now on how would you like that?
A debate is a formal discussion in which opposing arguments are put forward by opposing teams/individuals.
In general, debate has been a great way of reaching a conclusion/decision. Just like a group discussion, a debate is a way of finding which argument is stronger or which way is better. In fact, some philosophers have regarded debates as better than discussions because, since both the parties take a competitive edge, both sides are adequately represented for.