Supreme Court was not informed properly by JIT and it was admitted in trail court by Star Witness of JIT:
Panamagate Joint Investigation Team head Wajid Zia disclosed before an accountability court on Thursday that the JIT was not unanimous in sending a questionnaire to the Qatari prince to verify the money trail of the Sharif family.
During cross-examination in the Avenfield properties reference against ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif and his family members, Mr Zia admitted that though the JIT had written a letter to the implementation bench but this did not give a true picture to the bench that there was no consensus within the JIT about the questionnaire. Rather, he said, the Supreme Court had been requested to advise which option the investigation team should opt to verify contents of the letter of Qatari Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabber Al-Thani, which claimed that the Avenfield apartments had been handed over to the Sharif family as part of a settlement.
Defence counsel Khawaja Haris Ahmed read out the contents of the Qatari prince’s letter written to the JIT and said that Mr Al-Thani was ready to testify but was asking for a questionnaire before his formal testimony.
Mr Zia said that in response to the letter he received a phone call from SC’s deputy registrar Mazhar Abbas who “conveyed the bench’s decision that it was an investigation matter and the JIT may decide on its own”.
Interestingly, he revealed that the JIT had already decided that its members would neither travel to Doha nor send a questionnaire. However, he said, this decision was neither incorporated in the JIT report not did it inform the apex court about it.
The JIT head informed the court that he had been in the Police Service of Pakistan (PSP) for 29 years and had worked for the International War Crimes Tribunal, Yugoslavia, for five years.
He said that besides serving in the economic crime wing of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), he also was associated with a team that investigated the Benazir Bhutto murder case and high treason case.
“But have you ever investigated any NAB case before?” asked the defence counsel.
“No, I have never investigated a NAB case,” Mr Zia replied.
When Mr Sharif’s counsel asked if there was any law prohibiting the JIT from sending a questionnaire, Mr Zia said that in his career he had “never sent a questionnaire in advance to any witness”, though he admitted that the FIA had sent questionnaire to witnesses in some cases.
Asked if he had read the Police Rules 1861 in his 29 years of police service and if there were any rules prohibiting the JIT from sending a questionnaire to a witness, Mr Zia said he had not found any such rules directing him to send a questionnaire to a witness.
When Advocate Haris asked him how he had verified the letters of Mossack Fonseca, Mr Zia said the JIT had solicited confirmation and certification of three letters, including two of Mossack Fonseca, and there were no supporting documents along with Mossack Fonseca’s reply. He conceded that the JIT had not sought supporting documents from Financial Investigation Agency of the British Virgin Island and Mossack Fonseca. The JIT had also not written to the reporting officer of Mossack Fonseca, he added.
However, he said, the same procedure had not been adopted to verify the letter of the Qatari prince and he was asked to testify in person before the JIT’s secretariat in Islamabad or at Pakistani Embassy in Doha.
No accord in JIT over Qatari prince questionnaire, court told
Wajid Zia confirms Hussain Nawaz’s photo was leaked from JIT secretariat.www.dawn.com
Read Qatari prince reply, he was not willing to acknowlege jurdiscation of Pakistan and was not willing to appear before court of law. No court of law anywhere in the world would admit a testimony, where the person giving the testimany does not acknowldege court's juridication. Beside he was already stated clearly he would not appear before Pakistan's court, meaning he was not available for cross examination.
Iss ka jawab nahi ayay ga kabhi.....
London High Court 1999 Judgement Hudabiya vs Al Taufeeq.
Samba Bank 2005 correspondence with BVI service provider.
Panama FIA and attorney general response.
Hussain's Nawaz interview saying flats are mortagged and transferred from saudia through offical banking channel. where is that mortage deed and banking transcation????
