Resilient
Minister (2k+ posts)
Liabilities were paid as per JIT and do you know how much were the liabilities??
سربراہ براڈ شیٹ کی نواز شریف سے معافی،الزامات سے دستبردار
Liabilities were paid as per JIT and do you know how much were the liabilities??
So you saying High court will admit an inadmissable evidence. Go and see Salman Akram Raja views about Qatari letter before he became sharif's lawyer.
Resilient
Minister (2k+ posts)
Check facts before you post anything here.
You said and I quote; " NS proved in London court that his sons got these flats legitimately."
LOL, where is that Judgement from London High Court that these flats were legitmatelty acquired??? contact maryam and ask him to whatsapp you the court judgement so you can upload it here. Lol.
When the intial judgement was awarded in favour of broadsheet they targerted different assets of Pakistan overseas to recover their amount, including assets of PCB.
UK-based company targets Pakistan Cricket Team as legal asset over 33-million-dollar dispute
Sportstime247 is the sports news and recreation website. We bring together all news, views, updates for all forms of sports.www.sportstime247.com
They also filled a case in London High Court against Avenfield flats claiming GOP is entitled to these flats, hence these should be disposed off and proceeds be given to them. Later Broadsheet ITSELF withdrew that application as they found UBL account and got a freezing order from London High Court. When they withdrew the application against Avenfield apartments, they had to pay sharif's legal fees as well as they had brought up the case against them and had to prove it but before that they withdrew as they found assets of larger sum elsewhere. There entilement was around $30m and london flats value was much less than that, whereas UBL uk High Commission account had more than $28m.
UK court orders $28.7m payment to Broadsheet | The Express Tribune
Amount to be debited from HC account in London as NAB fails to clear liabilities to lobbyist firmtribune.com.pk
Why Kaveh paid $20000 to Nawaz Sharif at that time??
Resilient
Minister (2k+ posts)
The letter is part of evidence, it is the court who has to decide the admissibility of the letter.
Lol, show me where as per JIT liabilties were cleared, is you ever had read the JIT report yourself you would have Known. On the contraty JIT report proved these were not cleared, hence court proceeding started against
$36,023,899.91 UAE dirhams to be precise. (JIT Volume 3, Titled Gulf Steel Mills)
Also UAE government gave in writting that no such share sales agremment exists and hence story of $12 million dharam was fabricated. Infact a case was intiated by BCCI in 1994 against shafi for defaulting on the loan and he ran and came to Pakistan. That case went on till 2012.
Last edited:
Read above, answer is clearly there.
Supreme court has already decided it and has decided it to be an inadmissable evidence. Beside if you give in any testimany you have to appear before court of law for cross examination. Qatari prince refused to do so. And now don't say he was willing to come to court as we already had a lenghty discussion about it and I proved to you he wasn;t and after that you stopped replying.
Resilient
Minister (2k+ posts)
Headed by Mr Zia of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the JIT comprised representatives from the Inter-Services Intelligence, Military Intelligence, National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).
The report said: “Liabilities of 14 millions Dirhams were ostensibly settled between 1978 to 1986 after 25 percent share sale of erstwhile Gulf Steel Mills.”
It may be mentioned that the JIT was of the view that the Sharif family did not make an investment of AED 12 million with Qatari prince Hamad bin Jassim Al-Thani and cleared the liabilities of GSM instead from that amount.
When Advocate Ahmed asked “did any witness inform you about the settlement of liabilities through shares sale proceeds”, Mr Zia replied in the negative.
Initially Mr Zia claimed that Tariq Shafi, who was operating the business of the Sharif family in the UAE, had stated that the liabilities were settled through the sale of shares. However, the defence counsel pointed out that Mr Shafi in his statement recorded before the JIT categorically stated that he did not know who and when these liabilities were cleared.
Mr Zia informed the court that since there were huge liabilities on GSM and Mr Shafi also defaulted on loans of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) and he opened an account in 1986, therefore, the JIT presumed that he cleared the liabilities during the period between 1978 and 1986.
He went on to say that unless one cleared the liabilities, one could not open an account in the same bank.
Advocate Ahmed asked whether the JIT recorded statement of any official of BCCI, obtained any bank transaction or collected any evidence to substantiate its stance, Mr Zia frankly admitted “there is no direct evidence on record”.
Sharifs’ document to prove money trail discarded, says JIT chief
Wajid Zia informs court that JIT’s claim about liabilities settlement of Sharif family was on the basis of assumptions.
www.dawn.com
Resilient
Minister (2k+ posts)
Supreme Court was not informed properly by JIT and it was admitted in trail court by Star Witness of JIT:
Panamagate Joint Investigation Team head Wajid Zia disclosed before an accountability court on Thursday that the JIT was not unanimous in sending a questionnaire to the Qatari prince to verify the money trail of the Sharif family.
During cross-examination in the Avenfield properties reference against ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif and his family members, Mr Zia admitted that though the JIT had written a letter to the implementation bench but this did not give a true picture to the bench that there was no consensus within the JIT about the questionnaire. Rather, he said, the Supreme Court had been requested to advise which option the investigation team should opt to verify contents of the letter of Qatari Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabber Al-Thani, which claimed that the Avenfield apartments had been handed over to the Sharif family as part of a settlement.
Defence counsel Khawaja Haris Ahmed read out the contents of the Qatari prince’s letter written to the JIT and said that Mr Al-Thani was ready to testify but was asking for a questionnaire before his formal testimony.
Mr Zia said that in response to the letter he received a phone call from SC’s deputy registrar Mazhar Abbas who “conveyed the bench’s decision that it was an investigation matter and the JIT may decide on its own”.
Interestingly, he revealed that the JIT had already decided that its members would neither travel to Doha nor send a questionnaire. However, he said, this decision was neither incorporated in the JIT report not did it inform the apex court about it.
The JIT head informed the court that he had been in the Police Service of Pakistan (PSP) for 29 years and had worked for the International War Crimes Tribunal, Yugoslavia, for five years.
He said that besides serving in the economic crime wing of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), he also was associated with a team that investigated the Benazir Bhutto murder case and high treason case.
“But have you ever investigated any NAB case before?” asked the defence counsel.
“No, I have never investigated a NAB case,” Mr Zia replied.
When Mr Sharif’s counsel asked if there was any law prohibiting the JIT from sending a questionnaire, Mr Zia said that in his career he had “never sent a questionnaire in advance to any witness”, though he admitted that the FIA had sent questionnaire to witnesses in some cases.
Asked if he had read the Police Rules 1861 in his 29 years of police service and if there were any rules prohibiting the JIT from sending a questionnaire to a witness, Mr Zia said he had not found any such rules directing him to send a questionnaire to a witness.
When Advocate Haris asked him how he had verified the letters of Mossack Fonseca, Mr Zia said the JIT had solicited confirmation and certification of three letters, including two of Mossack Fonseca, and there were no supporting documents along with Mossack Fonseca’s reply. He conceded that the JIT had not sought supporting documents from Financial Investigation Agency of the British Virgin Island and Mossack Fonseca. The JIT had also not written to the reporting officer of Mossack Fonseca, he added.
However, he said, the same procedure had not been adopted to verify the letter of the Qatari prince and he was asked to testify in person before the JIT’s secretariat in Islamabad or at Pakistani Embassy in Doha.
No accord in JIT over Qatari prince questionnaire, court told
Wajid Zia confirms Hussain Nawaz’s photo was leaked from JIT secretariat.
www.dawn.com
Last edited:
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Your Noora ran away from jail after being convicted in NAB court, Harami
When was he proven innocent in court?
Former Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif sentenced to 10 years in jail
Corruption charges related to purchase of London flats, with verdict likely to affect election
Resilient
Minister (2k+ posts)
Your Noora ran away from jail after being convicted in NAB court, Harami
When was he proven innocent in court?
Former Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif sentenced to 10 years in jail
Corruption charges related to purchase of London flats, with verdict likely to affect electionamp.theguardian.com
The compromised court as termed by IHC.
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
اگر ایسا ہو جاتا تو تیری کنجر لیگ آج جیلوں میں ہوتی
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
جیو کی خبریں شریف خاندان کے حق میں پلانٹ کی جاتی ہیں
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
لندن فلیٹس کی منی ٹریل احتساب عدالت میں پیش کرنی تھی۔ وہاں تو مفرور کو سزا ہو گئی
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2...er-nawaz-sharif-sentenced-to-10-years-in-jail
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
کنجر تیرا مفرور لیڈر تو خود سیاسی جرنیلوں ضیا الحق اور جنرل جیلانی کی ناجائز اولاد ہے
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
As the appeals of Nawaz Mafroor are still pending in High Courts of Pakistan, his cases are still undecided. There is not proven anything so far other than his conviction in two NAB cases Harami
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Qatari letters is not considered money trail in court of law lol
Headed by Mr Zia of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the JIT comprised representatives from the Inter-Services Intelligence, Military Intelligence, National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).
The report said: “Liabilities of 14 millions Dirhams were ostensibly settled between 1978 to 1986 after 25 percent share sale of erstwhile Gulf Steel Mills.”
It may be mentioned that the JIT was of the view that the Sharif family did not make an investment of AED 12 million with Qatari prince Hamad bin Jassim Al-Thani and cleared the liabilities of GSM instead from that amount.
When Advocate Ahmed asked “did any witness inform you about the settlement of liabilities through shares sale proceeds”, Mr Zia replied in the negative.
Initially Mr Zia claimed that Tariq Shafi, who was operating the business of the Sharif family in the UAE, had stated that the liabilities were settled through the sale of shares. However, the defence counsel pointed out that Mr Shafi in his statement recorded before the JIT categorically stated that he did not know who and when these liabilities were cleared.
Mr Zia informed the court that since there were huge liabilities on GSM and Mr Shafi also defaulted on loans of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) and he opened an account in 1986, therefore, the JIT presumed that he cleared the liabilities during the period between 1978 and 1986.
He went on to say that unless one cleared the liabilities, one could not open an account in the same bank.
Advocate Ahmed asked whether the JIT recorded statement of any official of BCCI, obtained any bank transaction or collected any evidence to substantiate its stance, Mr Zia frankly admitted “there is no direct evidence on record”.
Sharifs’ document to prove money trail discarded, says JIT chief
Wajid Zia informs court that JIT’s claim about liabilities settlement of Sharif family was on the basis of assumptions.www.dawn.com
UAE Record states clearly no share sale agreement exists.
BCCI Filed a case againsts shafi in 1994 for defaulting on Loan. Case went on till 2012.
Balance sheet proves liabilities could not have been cleared from assets.
Contradiction upon contardiction in sharif statements before JIT are also highlighted.
UAE Response and BCCI Loan default case are enough evidence to establish liabilities were not cleared and no sale proceed of $12m exisited. Liabilties clear ho gain theen tu why BCCI intiated a case and Tariq shafi ran and came to Lahore.
Besides, there are irrefutable evidence which exists which you are not willing to admitt or deliabtely ignore.
London High Court 1999 Judgement Hudabiya vs Al Taufeeq.
Samba Bank 2005 correspondence with BVI service provider.
Panama FIA and attorney general response.
Hussain's Nawaz interview saying flats are mortagged and transferred from saudia through offical banking channel. where is that mortage deed and banking transcation????
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Fine. So he will stay in UK until death instead of fighting his cases in Pakistan, because courts are compromised lol
arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
