what do you call an official letter? its official meeting minutes, agreed by both parties and not just an open discussion like a think tank or so.. both sides are officials, meeting was official, and minutes were official... you did not answer my question... this message is for whom? i quote the words again " if VNC is successful, all sins will be forgiven, however if it fails, there will be consequences...."
Again . These are the extractions from the minutes . Have you seen the full Script of the minutes ? This is the only line I have seen been high lighted by IK. You can only comprehend the meaning when you have a full script of the minutes in front of you . These are classical out of context lines which are being exploited for some reason . I like to see what else is in those minutes . Have you seen the full context of the text ? So, don't take a few lines out and use it to promote your line of argument.
And how was it agreed ? do you see US representative sign on that memo ?
I my knowledge , the minutes are taken by each party and keep it for their record. There is no "Official" signing on those minutes from one side or other.
You 2nd and 3rd question is directly related to the above answer.
There is no official asking for the change of regime anywhere on the memo.
These words are the words of the ambassador's memo. The memo is not an offical documents signed by both parties .
so i did not get answer to my first three points.. lets move to point 4. you mentioned only 1 member,. i am pointing to all political parties and MNAs and media people who turned against PTI were having meetings with US officials... its all published its all factual.. you cannot deny that or ignore that fact
Can you tell me who others met with them . were they meeting with USA only or other EU countries diplomats were involved ? What was discussed with them . I have yet to see any document or any statement regarding the meetings with MNA and what was discussed with them . Did ISI kept the record of the meetings and what was discussed in those meetings . And did the ISI find any evidences of any conspiracy , did they take any actions against these MNAs ? Did IK filed cases of treason against them in court ?
Only because they met ,doesn't mean that they were conspiring against them . MNAs always meeting with foreign diplomats for various reasons . Even IK when he was in opposition met many EU and US diplomats . It is not a crime to meet them . Unless you have any evidence, you can't just lump sum everything together just to fake a case against them .
5. read my point again, i said across world and CIA website has those links where they accepted interfering in other countries
here is a link from wikipedia and for references, check references section, 4 of them from CIA website
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
Wikipedia is a updater. It is a collection for many items. It can be updated by anyone .. It is not an official statement of any country .
word play is simple, diverting attention is a tactic, both will not work as long as one is focused and argue logically..
Diversion is precisely what IK is doing . Divert the attention of his 4 years of performance and let the quom run after the truck rear light forever.
what are your thoughts on China if i can ask? or about talibans, islamophobia, western hypocracy or deep state? its my secondary question, you may ignore it for now
Chinese have shown their displeasure many times on PTI for holding the CPEC projects . Russian attack on Ukraine is a mistake and Chinese kept quite on it because of their own affair in Taiwan could be jeopardized. We can't hunker down on a principle of staying neutral when a sovereign country is attacked. Our Trading relationships wit Ukraine could be in danger. We have more trade relationship with Ukraine than Russian.