Read what your darling Sri Lankans are doing. After reading this i am beginning to see why there was a problem between Tamils and Sinhalese to begin with. Your "lack " of ideology is reverberating so loudly that you don't need to use that as an excuse for any plan of yours.
http://dawn.com/2013/03/29/sri-lanka-boosts-security-after-anti-muslim-attack/
I already believe that the Tamils were rightfully claiming "discrimination". I had been following this for months, just like every other news so this is nothing new to me.
This is not a lack of "ideology" because I have been arguing for a free Tamil homeland in that it can only be achieved if Tamil Nadu is freed. Such a small 20 million island nation to be divided by a minority is never going to happen unless the larger, 90 million people take part in it.
I was also the one who told you that they make Sri Lankan Muslims convert before entering the national cricket team like T.M. Dilshan and another player whose name was already announced for the national team and was a Muslim but before making the actual entry into the game, he had to convert to Buddhism.
Furthermore, the only Muslim national player that was acceptable to them was Farveez Maharoof whose father was/is a NASA Scientist (here, I also argued that America is a better place for Muslims than Sri Lanka, yet you morons still hate them).
To add more salt to your wounds (metaphorically), in principle, I do believe that the Tamil cause was just and the Muslims not siding with their terrorist activities was the right way to go about their politics. The Tamils labelled them as traitors and hacked hundreds of them to death in their sleep in Jaffna. This was condemnable and the Sinhala used this to woo in the Bangladeshis, Malaysians and most importantly, the Pakistanis.
I believe they should have supported them morally in a peaceful movement and nothing less, which is also what Jinnah said when he said that the 7% of the Muslims will extend their hands of friendship to the Dravidians if they are given equality and the country is run on the basis of fairplay (something that Periyar had already stated).
In Tamil Nadu, the mood among the Muslims is the same as the Hindus. There is no difference. This is shown by Kamla Hassan, a Brahmin, adopting a Muslim last name out of respect for his friend.
Therefore, they are all Tamilians, first. I have nothing further to add to this as it is already quite clear, I support the freedom for the Tamilians but it can only be achieved with the freedom of Tamil Nadu first, which can later support the referendum in Tamil Eelam (where most Muslims are Tamilians as Sinhalese are too small-minded and radicalized to accept anything "foreign").
In short, you have failed to project by assuming that this is just a ploy of some kind of geopolitics like in India and that I have no sincerity to human rights and especially to those of the Tamilians.
PS. I also don't believe that cricket plays a role in politics but I do believe that it reflects the national psyche, which is why it is clear that the Buddhists are bigoted quite like the Indian Hindutva extremists like yourself.
Last edited: