Un-Intelligent Design of Human Organs

Sphere Manisfest

Senator (1k+ posts)
Un-intelligent Design: No Purpose for Vestigial Ear-Wiggling Reflex

by Stephanie Pappas, Live Science Contributor | October 21, 2015 10:46am ET

Around the human ear are tiny, weak muscles that once would have let evolutionary ancestors pivot their ears to and fro. Today, the muscles aren't capable of moving much — but their reflex action still exists.

These muscles are vestigial, meaning they're remnants of evolution that once had a purpose but no longer do. However, humans may be able to repurpose these useless muscles for their own uses, according to Steven Hackley, a psychologist at the University of Missouri and author of a new review of research on the forgotten muscles in the journal Psychophysiology. For one, these muscles activate in response to positive emotions, for reasons nobody truly understands. This odd fact creates a handy tool for psychologists seeking an objective way to measure emotion.


And then there are the educational implications: This muscle reflex is new evidence against the notion of creationism or intelligent design, Hackley said.

"According to intelligent design and creationism, our body was designed by a being with perfect intelligence," he said. "If that were the case, why would he put circuits in our brains that don't work? Why would you put circuits in our brain which are useful for lemurs that are useless for humans?"


Mysterious muscles

Another question: Why study these useless muscles at all?

The use of tiny muscle responses to study emotions goes way back, Hackley said. Researchers have found that people have an elevated "startle" response — measured by the twitching of muscles below the eye — when they're experiencing a negative mood rather than a positive mood. This makes sense, he said, if you think about watching a horror movie late at night and hearing a sudden crash from outside. You're likely to be far more spooked than if you'd been watching a romantic comedy.

About a decade ago, psychologists tried to find this same response in the vestigial auricularis posterior muscle, which sits right behind the earand attaches at the ear's base. Unexpectedly, the auricularis posterior doesn't respond more strongly when a person is in a bad mood; instead, its response is strongest when people are at their happiest.

"This doesn't make sense," Hackley said. "There's nothing intuitive about it."

Even in people capable of wiggling their ears, the auricularis posterior reflex is too weak to actually move the ear. At first, Hackley said, researchers thought this muscle's engagement during happiness had to do with nursing: Perhaps some ancestor's infants learned to pull their ears back and out of the way while suckling, thus associating the muscle movement with the pleasure of food.

But experiments found no evidence for this nursing hypothesis. Now, Hackley is looking in a different direction. The tiny ear muscles are linked to the facial muscles that pull the mouth into a smile, he said — grin big, and you'll feel your ears retract. Perhaps the feeling of happiness primes the smile muscles for action, including the useless auricularis posterior. [Smile Secrets: 5 Things Your Grin Says About You]

Whatever the reason for this odd muscle activation, it's useful for psychologists. Self-reported emotion questionnaires can be inaccurate if people lie or aren't even aware of subtle emotions. Muscle responses don't like.
The person can't fake it," Hackley said.

Unintelligent design

There's another, perhaps more provocative implication to these pointless ear muscles, Hackley said: They're evidence against intelligent design.

In the battle over evolution, creationists and believers in an intelligent designer often claim that so-called vestigial organs have a purpose. And in many cases, they do. The appendix, for example, was long thought to be an intestinal dead end before scientists found that it can protect helpful bacteria during illness, allowing the useful microbes to repopulate the gut.

The vestigial ear reflexes are a different story, Hackley said. Because they don't move the ears at all, they truly are evolutionary relics. There is another muscle, the transversus auriculae, that still displays an active reflex, though not one with any purpose. This muscle is within the outer ear, or pinna, and it moves the edge of the outer ear by a mere millimeter or so when the eye is rotated way to the side.

In animals that can move their ears, an analogous muscle helps them rotate the ear toward whatever they are looking at, explaining the eye-ear link.
"I think I've got something here that [creationists] can't explain away," Hackley said. "Here's something in our brain that's completely useless, so why would a being of perfect intelligence put it there?"

Source



 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sphere Manisfest

Senator (1k+ posts)
OTHER USELESS HUMAN BODY PARTS

The Human Appendix

In plant-eating vertebrates, the appendix is much larger and its main function is to help digest a largely herbivorous diet. The human appendix is a small pouch attached to the large intestine where it joins the small intestine and does not directly assist digestion. Biologists believe it is a vestigial organ left behind from a plant-eating ancestor. Interestingly, it has been noted by paleontologist Alfred Sherwood Romer in his text The Vertebrate Body (1949) that the major importance of the appendix "would appear to be financial support of the surgical profession", referring to, of course, the large number of appendectomies performed annually. In 2000, in fact, there were nearly 300,000 appendectomies performed in the United States, and 371 deaths from appendicitis. Any secondary function that the appendix might perform certainly is not missed in those who had it removed before it might have ruptured.

Male Breast Tissue and Nipples

The subject of male nipples is a sensitive, and maybe confusing, topic to many. Those who wish to invalidate evolutionary theory might pose the question, "Was man descended from woman?" The answer, of course, is no. Both men and women have nipples because in early stages of fetal development, an unborn child is effectively sexless. Nipples are present in both males and females; it is only in a later stage of fetal development that testosterone causes sex differentiation in a fetus. All mammals, male and female, have mammary glands. Male nipples are vestigial; they may perform a small role in sexual stimulation and a small number of men have been able to lactate. However, they are not fully functional and, because cancer can grow in male or female breast tissue, the tissue can be dangerous.

Wisdom Teeth in Humans

With all of the pain, time, and money that are put into dealing with wisdom teeth, humans have become just a little more than tired of these remnants from their large jawed ancestors. But regardless of how much they are despised, the wisdom teeth remain, and force their way into mouths regardless of the pain inflicted. There are two possible reasons why the wisdom teeth have become vestigial. The first is that the human jaw has become smaller than its ancestors -and the wisdom teeth are trying to grow into a jaw that is much too small. The second reason may have to do with dental hygiene. A few thousand years ago, it might be common for an 18 year old man to have lost several, probably most, of his teeth, and the incoming wisdom teeth would prove useful. Now that humans brush their teeth twice a day, it's possible to keep one's teeth for a lifetime. The drawback is that the wisdom teeth still want to come in, and when they do, they usually need to be extracted to prevent any serious pain.

The Human Tailbone (Coccyx)

These fused vertebrae are the only vestiges that are left of the tail that other mammals still use for balance, communication, and in some primates, as a prehensile limb. As our ancestors were learning to walk upright, their tail became useless, and it slowly disappeared. It has been suggested that the coccyx helps to anchor minor muscles and may support pelvic organs. However, there have been many well documented medical cases where the tailbone has been surgically removed with little or no adverse effects. There have been documented cases of infants born with tails, an extended version of the tailbone that is composed of extra vertebrae. There are no adverse health effects of such a tail, unless perhaps the child was born in the Dark Ages. In that case, the child and the mother, now considered witches, would've been killed instantly.

 

MAwan

Senator (1k+ posts)
Its too early to declared some parts of human body are useless, wait atleast 100-200 years more and our future generations will find out the actual reason.
 

ameer77

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
Remove all Useless organs and tissues and look in to mirror ! u will find Answer y God has given u these useless things:)
 

Wadaich

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Even apple is useless to tree.

Remove all Useless organs and tissues and look in to mirror ! u will find Answer y God has given u these useless things:)

Its too early to declared some parts of human body are useless, wait atleast 100-200 years more and our future generations will find out the actual reason.

Any One Have A List Of Useless Humans?

Thanks

OTHER USELESS HUMAN BODY PARTS

The Human Appendix




Hats off to the thread poster. My two cent addition to this LAND MARK........their is a certain organ which sits idle most of the time of the day and is active only in copulation and peeing.....nor can one openly show it to others.

In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that such kind of low utility organs must be of "Plug n Play" nature so that one doesn't carry extra load all the time.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top