This DFID “rebuttal” of my story about Shahbaz Sharif is nothing of the kind - Daily Mail's reporter David Rose tweets

Jazbaati

Minister (2k+ posts)
so is having a child out of marriage - this goes against article 61 62 - so if the law has to be fair, then why not apply this on Imran khan too?

Someone has to prove that in court. IK certainly hasn't admitted it. There were some case against IK but who knows what's happening there. Also it depends on whether the courts think a personal matter such as a relationship affects the person's ability to do the job. Having an undeclared income can be a conflict of interest but having children is not likely to have any bearing on the job.
 

adeel.zafar

Senator (1k+ posts)
There were some case against IK but who knows what's happening there.
Establishment is very cunning - this case is sitting with Athar minnillah and will be taken up at the right time, when establishment thinks that there is no more use of this guy. Thats my feeling.

Someone has to prove that in court. IK certainly hasn't admitted it. There were some case against IK but who knows what's happening there.

IK has not denied it either. Infact, Jamina is the custodian of this child now. this girl has many pictures with imran khan sons. Same Daily Mail which is being promoted today had this headline:

"How Imran Khan's ex-wife Jemima has become a second mother to his love child"
 

adeel.zafar

Senator (1k+ posts)
Also it depends on whether the courts think a personal matter such as a relationship affects the person's ability to do the job. Having an undeclared income can be a conflict of interest but having children is not likely to have any bearing on the job.

But article 62 and 63is not about having conflict of interest or inability to do one's job.

It is about being sadiq and ameen - ritious, pious and following islamic values - Even a proven lie can make a person fall under this trap. I am not saying that it is a good thing, its just a law which is still there. Even if a person does not pray namaz, he can technically be disqualified - its just that wide open and no one has bothered to do anything about it.

Anyway, I should not have brought Imran khan's peronsal life - even maryam can be disqualified under this law if proven that she had baby before marriage, something that is being circulated on internet from time to time..

I only raised it because you wanted to apply the law strictly on 10 Rupees :)
 

chandaa

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
bhai sue kernay jain gay tu koi new evidence hi na nikal aain - so its better to keep quite and absorb bad press for few days, than opening a new pandora box ? ? ? ?
Noon league mein mujhey aap kafi aqal mand lagtey hain. Plz apni leadership se kahin ke Maryam ka phone le lein aur uss ka twitter handle close karwaa dein, noon ko kafi faidaa hou ga.
 

jeelu

Minister (2k+ posts)
Did you even read the link above: Its not embarrassment for Nooras - its a huge embarrassment for every PTI spokesperson who has been coming on TV on this issue.

In summary: it says that there is no corruption evidence but only some pakistani guy named shahzad akbar is claiming some little bit corruption./


A Department for International Development spokesperson said:

“The UK’s financial support to ERRA over this period was for payment by results – which means we only gave money once the agreed work, which was primarily focused on building schools, was completed, and the work audited and verified.
“The UK taxpayer got exactly what it paid for and helped the vulnerable victims of a devastating earthquake. We are confident our robust systems protected UK taxpayers from fraud.”

The Mail on Sunday provides little substantial evidence to support its headline.
It says investigators in Pakistan “are convinced that some of the allegedly stolen money came from DFID-funded aid projects” without providing any substantial evidence this was the case with the earthquake fund.

The piece goes on to quote Shahzad Akbar, Imran Khan's Asset Recovery Unit chief, saying it “appears” some money “may” have been stolen from aid and development projects, again without offering any substantial evidence this was the case with ERRA.
obviously ukaid is defending against the story.. not coz they care about shahbaz sharif ..its their reputation on the line here... but the thing is mate it aint pakistan.. this will be picked up and investigated coz it involves taxpayers money
 

brohiniaz

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
اب مجھے ۱۰۰ فیصد یقین ہوگیاکہ ان کی پرورش سوْر اور کوے کے گوشت پے ہوئی ہے تبہی تو اتنے مکار ،چالاک اور جھوٹے نکلے ہیں
 

khan_11

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
its look a like there are some people in that organisation who makes the money from this scam ,i lived in UK, some people who think that in UK there is no concept of corruption in public sector they are wrong
 

paittibahi

Minister (2k+ posts)
Here are my comments to UK gov. version. Pressure the UK govt. to produce documents about this project. Please make your comments on this website. Especially, if you live in UK, ask you Representatives to raise this matter in the Parliament and any other legal venues.
 

Back
Top