The Business of Asma-Jehangirism & Liberal Extremism

G

Guest

Guest
ind0522a.gif

Former Prime Minister I. K. Gujral with to Asma Jahangir


Should we start a civil war because some liberal extremists in our elite are upset about the alleged flogging video?

Some occasions are not meant for settling scores. But a minority in our elite that has an ideological problem with religion is at it again. They are not even willing to stop and consider a range of possibilities, including the possibility of foul play. Now we have a statement from the girl named in the video confirming this is not her. She still lives in the village supposedly cited in the video and no one there has seen this flogging take place.


Theres no question there have been atrocities committed in Swat before the peace deal in Feb. 2009. Theres also no question that everyone in Pakistan has condemned the video. But shouldnt intelligent people also ask questions about where, when, and how it was filmed and by whom. Rationality demands that all possibilities be probed.

We still dont know how this video was simultaneously released to several local TV channels? And why the Presidency was quick to leak to the media that Mr. Zardari may not endorse the peace deal after this mysterious incident. Why was Mr. President so quick to make this indirect statement without even considering when this alleged flogging occurred: before or after the peace deal? Or was the objective to simply find an excuse to scrap the deal, which is what the Americans badly want and Mr. Zardari is more than happy to oblige without considering what it would mean: endless bloodshed and pitching our security forces against its own people, which is apparently what Washington likes to see?

These liberal extremists are also unwilling to consider the wider picture. We have reports of foreign elements inserted into our entire western and northern regions of Pakistan. We have reports that some of them could be covert operatives fluent in Pashto or Uzbek and hiding as Islamists and sent with the objective of inciting the local population to fight against their own country [Bagram air base near Kabul has secret American crack units that eat, live and operate separately from the rest of the U.S. army] and commit excesses against minorities, which justifies more U.S. intervention inside Pakistan. These terrorists were using Islam to kill innocent people. The government has called their bluff and implemented Sharia. Now anyone who decides to continue fighting cant say hes doing this for the sake of Islam. If this ensures end of bloodshed, whats wrong with that? And why should our minority liberal extremists echo everything America says?

This group raising all this noise over the mysterious video is the same one that helped Mukhtaran Mai become a multimillionaire. Now we have the truth emerging that her famous rape case may not have been what it was portrayed to be. Initially she was shown to be a 19-year-old raped by the elders of her village. It turned out later she was 10 years older, divorced and had some other personal issues relating to marriage and men. Thats her business and it by no means demeans her and none of this is meant to justify any wrongdoing done to her. But the way she agreed later to become a pawn in the hands of western embassies and NGOs who used her to smear Pakistan and make money out of it was despicable, but thats acceptable to our liberal extremist minority who also happen to be experts in self-hatred and are ever ready to bad mouth their own homeland at the slightest chance.

Former President Musharraf aptly described Mukhtaran as a woman profiting out of rape. And he was right. There were people among our liberal extremists who encouraged her to follow the line given to her by anti-Pakistan western organizations keen to use this case to malign the country out of proportion. Our liberal extremists helped her make millions and never apologized when it turned out not all parts of her story matched. Now they are doing the same with this video. No one is bothered that there are so many conflicting stories about it [Was the flogged woman married and arrested for walking publicly with her father in law as Geo News said or was she unmarried and was set up by her former lover-turned-Taliban because she wont marry him as Dawn News or one of the other channels alleged?]. This business of Asma-Jehangirism [making money and fame out of nonissues that appeal to the West] should end at some stage. Its shallow and sickening.
 

sangeen

Minister (2k+ posts)
This old crapy bitch is indeed a greedy woman who will do anything to pocket some handsom amount....... Some people put their greed before all their values, honesty and the nation dignity..... Shame on these so called liberal, extra-fashioned BITCHES....
 

armani

Minister (2k+ posts)
Sangeen!
Loved your comments.
I did not know alot about this lady but I was stunned to see her reaction on SC verdict about NRO. She is the one who started spreading the concept of SC interfering in the power house of executive. Instead appreciation the verdict against thugs she gave them a biased reason to talk against CJ. She knew that almost every citizen is happy with the decision still she wont stop*****************.
Cheers bro.
 

biomat

Minister (2k+ posts)
story4.gif

Assalam-o-alaikum
Read AHMED OWAIS ADVOCATE answers u will know whats the problem with Miss Asma Jehangir..
Hope it will clear some points in your minds.
Regards
 

ashraf196

Citizen
this bitch is upset because her husband is involved in corruption and his name is the list beneficiaries of NRO. She barking on 62, 63 (F) whats the problem with that. People who are representing mass should be AMEEN NOT KHINE. Trust worthy not robber. Even is she has her own opinion then she should condemn parliamentarians who have not abolished 62/63 from the constitution. 6 Assemblies are gone until now. the only reason is malafide. BITCH BITCH
 

Star Gazer

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
If 17 judges are unanimous in their decision and Asma J is opposing it the let her go to the court or the court should invite her to defend herself against Contempt of court. She is used to getting away with all kinds of harmfull remarks due to some nuisance that she has accumulated. Let her say all that she wants to say and then get her in the court!