Pakistani Diaspora Bucks Global Trend With 2.8% Higher Remittances in 2016

[RiazHaq]

Pakistani diaspora bucked the 2016 global decline in remittances with a modest 2.8% increase over 2015, according to a recently released World Bank report. An estimated $19.8 billion remitted to Pakistan amounted to 6.9% of the country's GDP. This is a welcome relief coming on the heels of the State Bank of Pakistan report indicating the country's current account deficit widened to $6.13 billion or 2.6% of GDP in the first 9 months of fiscal 2017.

2016 Remittances to South Asia. Source: World Bank

Global Decline:

Meanwhile, global remittance flows to developing countries registered a decline for two successive years, said the report. Remittances declined by an estimated 2.4 percent, to $429 billion, in 2016, after a decline of 1 percent in 2015. India, the largest remittance-receiving country worldwide, led the fall with a decrease of 8.9 percent in remittance inflows.

South Asia Region:

Remittances to India declined by 8.9 percent in 2016, to $62.7 billion, ranking the country as the top recipient of such inflows. In Bangladesh, remittances declined by an estimated 11.1 percent in 2016. In Pakistan, the 12 percent growth witnessed in 2015 moderated to an estimated 2.8 percent in 2016. Nepal experienced unusually high growth in remittances, at 14.3 percent in 2015, due to emigrants sending financial assistance after the earthquake. In 2016, remittance flows to Nepal declined by an estimated 6.7 percent from the previous years high level. In Sri Lanka, remittance growth was estimated at 3.9 percent in 2016.

Next Year Forecast:

The World Bank says the remittance growth in the region is projected to remain muted, because of low growth and fiscal consolidation in GCC countries with low energy prices. An increase of only 2.0 percent is expected in 2017. Bangladeshs remittance growth in 2017 is forecast at 2.4 percent, Indias at 1.9 percent, Pakistans at 1.4 percent, and Sri Lankas at 1.3 percent.

Summary:

World Bank report says Pakistani diaspora bucked the 2016 global decline in remittances with a modest 2.8% increase over 2015. An estimated $19.8 billion remitted to Pakistan amounted to 6.9% of the country's GDP. This is a welcome relief coming on the heels of the State Bank of Pakistan report indicating the country's current account deficit widened to $6.13 billion or 2.6% of GDP in the first 9 months of fiscal 2017. Future growth in remittances is likely to remain muted. Slowing growth in such inflows will further increase pressure on Pakistan to work on enhancing exports and attracting more foreign direct investment.

Source

 

[RiazHaq]

China bails out Pakistan with over $1bn in loans

Rising imports and falling exports and remittances pose threat of new forex crisis

https://www.ft.com/content/3ae64c9a-ffd8-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30


China has provided Pakistan with over $1bn in bailout loans since June last year, as the south Asian country looks to stave off a foreign currency crisis that could yet lead to another multinational rescue package.


State-backed Chinese banks have come to Pakistan’s rescue on two separate occasions, officials have told the Financial Times, with $900m coming in 2016, followed by another $300m in the first three months of this year.

The loans demonstrate the perilous fragility of Pakistan’s stocks of foreign currency, which have been depleted in the past few months as imports have risen while both exports and inbound remittances from Pakistanis abroad have fallen.

China’s financial help also underlines the increasingly close, if complex, relationship between the two Asian neighbours.

In 2013, Pakistan secured a $6.6bn loan from the International Monetary Fund after being faced with a similar balance of payments crisis. In the same year, it quietly took advantage of a currency swap line with the People’s Bank of China, the central bank, to shore up its reserves.

Islamabad made the final repayment on the IMF loan last year, prompting optimism from policymakers in Pakistan and abroad that the country was finally on the path to economic stability. Christine Lagarde, the head of the IMF, called it a “moment of opportunity” for the country.

In recent months however, the country’s trade deficit has widened, depleting its foreign reserves once more.

Figures from the State Bank of Pakistan show the country had $17.1bn of net reserves at the end of February, down from $18.9bn at the end of October and a peak of $25bn several years ago. A burgeoning trade deficit with China — which has doubled in recent years, according to data from the Pakistan Business Council — is a big part of the problem.



This has forced the country to seek emergency loans from outside sources to keep being able to repay older loans made in foreign currencies.

Of the $1.2bn from the Chinese institutions, $600m came from the government-run China Development Bank and another $600m from the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the only mainland bank to have a branch in Pakistan. Policy banks such as CDB often act on behalf of the central bank.

One Pakistani official said: “China keeps a very close eye on our economic trends and they're happy to come to our help wherever needed.”

The recent deterioration is expected to continue, however, with China’s investment plans prompting a surge of imports from that country. As a result, experts are now warning Pakistan is likely to have to return to international institutions such as the IMF for further support.

“Technically speaking we should have gone back to the IMF in January, but ministers are likely to try and wait until after the election [which is planned for 2018],” said Vaqar Ahmed, deputy executive director of the Islamabad-based Sustainable Development Policy Institute.

One member of the ruling PML-N party confirmed to the Financial Times that ministers were loath to return to the IMF until after the election in an effort to limit the political fallout.

“The IMF is a politically volatile issue in our country. If we go to the IMF to deal with our needs, that will send a very negative political signal and the opposition [parties] will use that against the government,” the person said.