Re: Official Order OF CM Punjab :-| :') As A Pakistani, Sharing Of This Letter Is FARZ On YOU
Lets see how Sethi strikes back on Monday. Here is my take on it:
1) Talat claimed in his last program that Sethi's chirya was Malik Riaz at which Sethi said that Talat should put forward any evidence for any financial gains Sethi has received from Malik Riaz. Lets wait here for a second. in Talat's last program the implication was that journalists have been receiving a lot of benefits from Malik Riaz that is why they will cover for him in coming days , benefits like cars, plots and villas were mentioned by Talat in this regard. Sethi was right to ask for evidence since the implication was that Sethi has also been receiving such benefits. Now Talat has back tracked he should have cleared in last program that Sethi was only receiving information from chirya not plots and cars.
2) If Sethi received information from Riaz, whats the problem in it. Journalists use any sources be it from political parties, army, bureaucracy, common public or even criminals. Riaz is an immensely powerful person having links with almost all the powers that mean anything in Pakistan. I don't see any problem in Sethi using Riaz as a source unless for airing those views Sethi was getting payment from Riaz which Talat now claims is not the case.
3) Sethi was wrong in boasting that Geo is the most followed channel in Pakistan and others are jealous. Keeping this in mind what Talat claimed was even more ridiculous. Religion is a divine gift and should not be dragged in such discussion. Talat's claims (about how Dawn news is at last number and how last number is Holy) also backfire e.g.:
a) Rasool Allah (PBUH) was the last messenger but he himself claimed that his Ummah will be greater then anyother Ummah and will be a source of pride for him (first in number of followers).
b) Rasool Allah (PBUH) was promised to be first in Jannah (stress on first)
c) Abu Bakr (r) was first Khalifa annd according to Sunni sources greatest (stress on first)
d) Ahadith, Sahaba and Taabaien all claimed that first Muslims were greatest, the later after them and so on (being first stressed)
The whole argument is insane as it can be pushed anywhere and it does not make any sense.
4) The defense of strataform (?) was spot on. Lets see how Sethi counters.
5) The claims about Sethi's hassad and age were uncalled for and low blows since Talat started it not Sethi.
6) Unless further clarifications I think Sethi is the winner here (bigsmile)
Lets see how Sethi strikes back on Monday. Here is my take on it:
1) Talat claimed in his last program that Sethi's chirya was Malik Riaz at which Sethi said that Talat should put forward any evidence for any financial gains Sethi has received from Malik Riaz. Lets wait here for a second. in Talat's last program the implication was that journalists have been receiving a lot of benefits from Malik Riaz that is why they will cover for him in coming days , benefits like cars, plots and villas were mentioned by Talat in this regard. Sethi was right to ask for evidence since the implication was that Sethi has also been receiving such benefits. Now Talat has back tracked he should have cleared in last program that Sethi was only receiving information from chirya not plots and cars.
2) If Sethi received information from Riaz, whats the problem in it. Journalists use any sources be it from political parties, army, bureaucracy, common public or even criminals. Riaz is an immensely powerful person having links with almost all the powers that mean anything in Pakistan. I don't see any problem in Sethi using Riaz as a source unless for airing those views Sethi was getting payment from Riaz which Talat now claims is not the case.
3) Sethi was wrong in boasting that Geo is the most followed channel in Pakistan and others are jealous. Keeping this in mind what Talat claimed was even more ridiculous. Religion is a divine gift and should not be dragged in such discussion. Talat's claims (about how Dawn news is at last number and how last number is Holy) also backfire e.g.:
a) Rasool Allah (PBUH) was the last messenger but he himself claimed that his Ummah will be greater then anyother Ummah and will be a source of pride for him (first in number of followers).
b) Rasool Allah (PBUH) was promised to be first in Jannah (stress on first)
c) Abu Bakr (r) was first Khalifa annd according to Sunni sources greatest (stress on first)
d) Ahadith, Sahaba and Taabaien all claimed that first Muslims were greatest, the later after them and so on (being first stressed)
The whole argument is insane as it can be pushed anywhere and it does not make any sense.
4) The defense of strataform (?) was spot on. Lets see how Sethi counters.
5) The claims about Sethi's hassad and age were uncalled for and low blows since Talat started it not Sethi.
6) Unless further clarifications I think Sethi is the winner here (bigsmile)
Last edited: