Sorry dude.. OK! I'll try to explain Fractional reserve lending (a subject taught in detail in Masters) in a few lines here.
Let there be 3 people - You, me and the farmer. And let there be the only bank in town - MCB.
I deposit MY MONEY ($10,000) in a checking account at the MCB.
You want to buy the farm from the farmer for $9000.
You approach MCB for the loan. MCB lends you $9000 of MY money to you and collateralize the farm.
Farmer gets his $9000.
This is called Fractional reserve lending. Reserve ratio of 10%. (bank maintains 10%)
Now here is the problem.
You see I am counting that $10,000 as my money. and my business decisions are based on that knowledge.
You bought that farm for $9000 after calculating that you will make enough money from the farm to pay the land off in 10 yrs.
The farmer is the owner of cash. This is the same money I am counting as mine.
That was a micro problem. The macro problem is all our decisions (you, me, the farmer and the bank) are all inter-connected.
If I take a risk accordingly ($10k), when the bank has only reserved $1k for me, that could bust the bank. Bank forces a recall of its loan on the farm from you. Your sales of crops drop because prices have fallen due to the lack of money in the system. The farmer benefited the most because if it werent for the bank, farmer would have never been able to sell his farm for $9000. Bank created an "Artificial buyer" out of you for the farmer. Now the Bank owns the land, you owe the money and I am screwed on my deposit.
FRB is not the easiest to grasp. If it still remains to be a vague idea, watch this video
Let there be 3 people - You, me and the farmer. And let there be the only bank in town - MCB.
I deposit MY MONEY ($10,000) in a checking account at the MCB.
You want to buy the farm from the farmer for $9000.
You approach MCB for the loan. MCB lends you $9000 of MY money to you and collateralize the farm.
Farmer gets his $9000.
This is called Fractional reserve lending. Reserve ratio of 10%. (bank maintains 10%)
Now here is the problem.
You see I am counting that $10,000 as my money. and my business decisions are based on that knowledge.
You bought that farm for $9000 after calculating that you will make enough money from the farm to pay the land off in 10 yrs.
The farmer is the owner of cash. This is the same money I am counting as mine.
That was a micro problem. The macro problem is all our decisions (you, me, the farmer and the bank) are all inter-connected.
If I take a risk accordingly ($10k), when the bank has only reserved $1k for me, that could bust the bank. Bank forces a recall of its loan on the farm from you. Your sales of crops drop because prices have fallen due to the lack of money in the system. The farmer benefited the most because if it werent for the bank, farmer would have never been able to sell his farm for $9000. Bank created an "Artificial buyer" out of you for the farmer. Now the Bank owns the land, you owe the money and I am screwed on my deposit.
FRB is not the easiest to grasp. If it still remains to be a vague idea, watch this video
Dude, you are WAY too technical for me in this field. I just wish I could understand half the things you are saying, sigh. Why can't you speak in easy lingo for us Financial Dummies? :)
In the interim, can you kindly clarify what you mean by the below? Do you mean to say that you believe in a monetary system where the money-supply is not controlled? Is that even possible?
Thanks!