Bismillah ir Rahman ir Raheem
@babadeena
I screen everything through Quran and for me Quran's authority is absolute and must. If it goes against Quran then I do not accept it.
brother taul and abduttawab...this is the most common argument presented by rejecters of hadeeth...and through this argument they get the following benefits:
1) they simply discredit the complete Ilmul Hadeeth including Saheeh Bukhari and Saheeh Muslim...
although Alhamdulillah there is Ijma among scholars and they all are agreed upon Bukhari and Muslim as the most authentic compilation of Hadeeth and there is no week hadith in these two books... Alhamdulillah..
(Few Names of some of the great early scholars of Islam who have approved Saheeh Bukhari as the most authentic book on the face of the earth after Quran.
Imam Ahmed bin Hambel, Imam Yahya bin Moaeen, Imam Ali bin Madeenee, Imam Aqeeli, Imam Daruktuni, Imam Hakim Neesapori, Imam Nisai, Imam abu Fatah Ajli, Imam fazal bin Ismael Jarjani, Imam Balqeeni, Hafiz Ibn Salah, Abu Ishaq Isfarenee, Imam ul Harmain, Imam Nowi, Imam abulfalah Hambli, Abul Fatah Qasheeri, Imam Abdullah Al Hameedi, Hafiz Abu Nasr Sajzi, Imam Shamsuddin Kermani, Allama Qastalani, Ibn Hajr, Imam Ibn Taimiyah, Hafiz Ibn Katheer, Hafiz Sakhawi)
as far as other Compilations of Hadeeth are concerned they are also authentic in a sense that they all contains ahadeeth with asanaad (chains) and it is very easy for Scholars and students of Hadeeth to filter authentic ahadeeth from week/dhaeef ahadeeth and alhamdulillah the sepciality of asanaad (chain) makes the ilmul hadeeth one of the most authentic ilm/science on the face of the earth
(I personally call it one of the Miracles of Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)).
2) the above argument gives them a room to do whatever they want, gives them a room to explain quran as per their whims and wishes and intellect, without considering the specific circumstances in which the specific ayah was revealed and the intentions of Almighty Allah which only Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) could know and explain. and of course those specific circumstances and intentions of Allah (subhanwau tallah) help us to understand Quran more accurately.
(surprisingly you would see that most of these so called Only Quran believers use Arabic Dictionaries to translate Quran (they have more faith on dictioneries then Saheeh Ahadeeth) and some times they even dont have the ability to translate the quran by their own but on the contrary they claim that their understanding of Quran is more authentic then the understanding of Salaf (Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), Sahaba, Tabain etc).
3) above argument gives them a room to simply reject the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) when ever they want and simply shout the slogan "for me Quran is enough".
Reasons why their argument is wrong
1) For us authentic Hadeeth means an action or saying of Prophet Muhammad (salla laahu alaihi wasallam) therefore, rejecting authentic hadeeth means rejecting sayings of Prophet Muhammad (salall laahu alaihi wasallam)
2) Actions and sayings of Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) can not be against Quran.
3) Screening saheeh ahadeeth through quran is completely a wrong notion.
4) Screening saheeh ahadeeth through Quran means screening sayings and actions of Prophet (salall laahu alaihi wasalla) through Quran which is completely illogical and act of blasphemy.
5) what if a Sahabi had stood up and said i would screen the sayings of Prophet (sallal laahu alaih waallam) through quran and accept only those sayings of Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi waallam) which are according to Quran and would not accept any saying against Quran (nauzobillah)...we know that no sahabi could have said any thing like that...in the same way we say that any one who says that I would screen the saheeh ahadeeth through quran he is doing act of blasphamy.
6) If someone starts saying that I will screen Quran through basic Human Rights, if I find any thing against human rights in Quran I will not take it and if I find any thing according to human rights I will accept it....
Of course being a muslim and being the true believer of Quran we will reject that notion as we believe that there is nothing in Quran against basic human rights likewise we say that there is no saheeh hadeeth against Quran, and if someone thinks that there is any thing then of course it is the fault of his intellect and understanding rather than Quran, and isntead of screening Quran we need to screen our understanding and intellect.
7) There are different groups of Hadeeth Rejecters who are not agreed upon the number of Salat... some of them pray 3 times a day, some of them pray 4 times, and some of them 5 times, and some of them dont pray at all... but on the contrary they falsely claim that if the whole ummah just start believing Only Quran we (ummah) will be united... After rejecting the Sunnah of Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and understanding quran through their intellect if they are not united upon the number of Salat how come they claim to unite ummah on other issues without following Sunnah.
8) Their (Hadeeth Rejecters) understanding of Quran is based on anti Hadeeth mentality....therefore, their understanding can not be accepted at all...
As we all know that lots of Orientalists (non muslims, christians, jews etc.) have translated and tried to understand Quran but as their approach was completely different and their approach was to critisize Quran and Islam rather than to understand Quran, therefore, they could not reach to the right point.
Like wise the approach of these Hadeeth Rejecters is to explain the quran in a way so that the doors towards accepting hadeeth could be shut....that attitude would never let them understand quran in its real sense...as there are many places in Quran where a student is stuck and he definitely needs the guidance from the Sunnah and Seerah of Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) to understand it properly.
May Allah guide us keep us on straight path.
To know more about Pervaizi Cult (Hadeeth Rejecters) the following material is worth reading.
Aina e Pervaiziyet
http://ahlulhadeeth.net/book/Aina-e-Parwaiziat.pdf
Prohibition of explaining Quran by mere opinion
http://www.qsep.com/media/135.php
Critical analysis of Modernist and Hadeeth Rejecters by Brother Sajid Qayum
http://www.qsep.com/books/modernists.html
Dawam e Hadeeth by sheikh Hafiz Muhammad Gondalvi
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/Dawamhadith1.zip
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/Dawamhadith2.zip
Makalaat by Allama Mohammad Ismail salafi.
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/SALFI1.zip
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/SALFI2.zip
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/SALFI3.zip
Difa e Sunnet by Allama Sanullah Amratsari
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/DifaSunnat.zip
Nusrat ul Bari by Mulana Abdul Rauf Rehmani (Saheeh Bukhari ka Mukam)
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/NusratulBari.zip
Difa e Saheeh Bukhari by Abul Qasim Saif Banarsi
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/DifaBukhari1.zip
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/DifaBukhari2.zip
http://www.docs.umm-ul-qura.org/DifaBukhari3.zip