This guy David is not the representative of Daily mail anymore. they have kicked him out since he came empty-handed with no evidence. What you are not understanding because of your ultra-low IQ is that the case with Daily male was for its publication. If it was just for the NAB then it should have not removed the publication completely. Why they did not update it with another addendum
"However being in power SS has forced NAB not to do any case against him"
When Shahzad Akbar and Imran Khan were in power tell me which NAB case ever mentioned DFID funds against Shahbaz Shareef. I never even heard a single word DFIF in NAB case proceedings. The SS thief appeared in countless NAB proceedings.
Can you even quote Sidiq Jaan taking about DFID. I will accept it man.
You must also remember that NCA investigated all the allegations for two years with all accounts of the thieves frozen in UK
The main issue was what evidence David Rose has gathered from his investigative efforts. Turned out - Zero. For political statements IK and Shazad Akbar, you let them lose these Besharm people will still do the same for his Monkeys.
And please dont quote the Plea Bargaining for some random guy. In Pakistan you guys made Rana Sanna Ullah admit that he is a drug smuggler. ? That is the kind of Information factory IK was running for his Monkeys.
NCA inquiry related to only two accounts.
No wonder why it's so easy to fool brain dead patawari like you.
Naveed ikram former director of ERRA has pleaded guilty of stealing funds from ERRA accounts and transferring looted money to Ali Imran. Banking record of funds transfer from ERRA Accounts to Ali Imran accounts exist. Instead of answering about it, Ali Imran fled to UK. Daily Mail Publication also mentions about seeing this banking record, it has also presented that as evidence against Ali Imran. Shabaz, Ali Imran has failed to present a rebuttal against the evidence presented by Daily Mail and instead choose to settle the matter out of court on Daily Mail Terms.
Funds and grants came to ERRA from many sources including DFID. Publication was saying ERRA funds (which included DFID funds too) have been stolen and Ali Imran is amongst the beneficiary of that stolen money. David Rose being a UK citizen and Daily Mail being a British publication was questioning is DFID funding a project (ERRA) from British tax payers money that is being stolen by family of Pakistani Politician? DFID is just one donor, they are hundreds of them for earth quake relief. DFID is of importance to UK, in Pakistan its the body ERRA that is the main concern.
Now yeah loo patwari this is your own publication,
According to exclusive documents, available with The News, Ikram Naveed bought three floors worth Rs132 million in Ali Trade Centre, owned by Imran Ali. Ikram, his wife Samina and son Farjad, bought two complete commercial floors and a complete penthouse floor in Ali Trade Centre. I
nterestingly, the accused directly transferred more than Rs60 million from the accounts of ERRA to the accounts of Ali and Fatima Developers, owned by Imran Ali.
LAHORE: Former chief financial officer of Punjab Power Development Company Ikram Naveed has confessed to embezzling Rs500 million in three different government companies and departments, The News...
www.thenews.com.pk
Ali Imran hasn't been able to answer about ERRA funds stealing from ERRA in Pakistan nor was able to refute it in London High Court and shabaz, being the claimant at one time was looking for stay against proceeding, Ali Imran was also under pressure from sharifs to settle the matter out of court at the earliest. Yes the story was taken down from Daily Mail but it is as a result of settlement (wanted by the Sharif's) and that too on the terms of newspaper.
Shahbaz filed a defamation lawsuit seeking damages, cost and apology from the newspaper from wrongful allegation of corruption, money laundering etc. That's what all claimant in defamation lawsuit seek and are entailed too either through court of law or even in out of court settlement (if wrongfully accused).
Shabaz sharif and family neither was able to;
1. Refute evidence presented by Daily Mail.
2. Wasn't awarded defamation lawsuit
3. Paid all their costs and partial cost of Daily Mail too.
4. Daily Mail didn't apologies to sharif for calling them thief, money launderer, etc etc
If sharif had nothing to hide they would have refuted daily mail evidence and won the defamation law suit from court, be awarded damages and costs from court and gotten Daily Mail to clarify that we accused sharifs of stealing, money laundering, fake tts, these claims are wrong and we apologies to them for the wrong claims and distress caused by them. Even on out of court settlement they would have gotten damages, costs and explicit apology for accusing them of corruption and money laundering. Instead they were in a hurry to the settle the matter out of court on publications terms.
