RajaRawal111
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Masha Allah you have done lots of research and all from the Tamasha that Shazad Akbar had used to do. It seems like
جناب کو بھی وھی جن چمڑ گیا ہے جو شہزاد اکبر کو چمڑ ہوا کرتا تھا
So let us see what you have written
How many accounts their should be. Which accounts the NCA missed scrutinizing. Can you tell please?
Even Rana Sanaullah admitted involvement in drug smuggling ? to meet extra expenses on politics and Lots of Imrani Monkeys danced on it
DFID kicked at the asses of Shahzad Akbar and David Rose within 4 hours after the publication in Daily Mail. Following rebuttal from DFID was literally a slipper lloadedwith Shit on the face of Imran Khan and his followers like you. Just read it your self please
“The UK’s financial support to ERRA over this period was for payment by results – which means we only gave money once the agreed work, which was primarily focused on building schools, was completed, and the work audited and verified.
“The UK taxpayer got exactly what it paid for and helped the vulnerable victims of a devastating earthquake. We are confident our robust systems protected UK taxpayers from fraud.”
dfidnews.blog.gov.uk

1: How the hell do you know what evidence were presented by daily Mail. Can you show me those ???
2: I dont understand what you mean by "wasn't awarded Law Suit". The Case was listed for proceeding. Things were in progress. What other hell was required to be done here.
3: This is where I say you guys are ultimate Jahils. The cost that SS had to Pay to Daily Mail was to end the mutually agreed Stay. For hell sake take your head out of ass of Imran Riyaz and read the Page-2 and Para-2 of the court order. Pleeeas Read it. ?
4: All I can say is that it is a matter of your low IQ and. Coming down to your level of understanding --- once again, I will say if SS was still "thief, money launderer, etc etc" then whole article should have not been removed. It could have corrected the NAB case portion only. But everything has been taken off.
And Please chunney Kaakey try to understand that out-of-court settlement was done by Daily mail also. SS only aim was to be exonerated from the Bakwas that Shahzad Akbar fed to David rose. That is what the paper has done. If you have any problem with that, then go to UK court and restart the case and keep me informed with all that you get. That is tha last humble request i can do man.
جناب کو بھی وھی جن چمڑ گیا ہے جو شہزاد اکبر کو چمڑ ہوا کرتا تھا
So let us see what you have written
NCA inquiry related to only two accounts.
How many accounts their should be. Which accounts the NCA missed scrutinizing. Can you tell please?
No wonder Naveed Ikram or whoever is in the police custody can say anything they want him to say. Or you can be fed with any chooran they want. This is Pakistan whereNaveed ikram former director of ERRA has pleaded guilty of stealing funds from ERRA accounts and transferring looted money to Ali Imran. Banking record of funds transfer from ERRA Accounts to Ali Imran accounts exist. Instead of answering about it, Ali Imran fled to UK. Daily Mail Publication also mentions about seeing this banking record, it has also presented that as evidence against Ali Imran. Shabaz, Ali Imran has failed to present a rebuttal against the evidence presented by Daily Mail and instead choose to settle the matter out of court on Daily Mail Terms.
Funds and grants came to ERRA from many sources including DFID. Publication was saying ERRA funds (which included DFID funds too) have been stolen and Ali Imran is amongst the beneficiary of that stolen money. David Rose being a UK citizen and Daily Mail being a British publication was questioning is DFID funding a project (ERRA) from British tax payers money that is being stolen by family of Pakistani Politician? DFID is just one donor, they are hundreds of them for earth quake relief. DFID is of importance to UK, in Pakistan its the body ERRA that is the main concern.
Now yeah loo patwari this is your own publication,
According to exclusive documents, available with The News, Ikram Naveed bought three floors worth Rs132 million in Ali Trade Centre, owned by Imran Ali. Ikram, his wife Samina and son Farjad, bought two complete commercial floors and a complete penthouse floor in Ali Trade Centre. Interestingly, the accused directly transferred more than Rs60 million from the accounts of ERRA to the accounts of Ali and Fatima Developers, owned by Imran Ali.
![]()
PPDC official admits embezzling Rs500m
LAHORE: Former chief financial officer of Punjab Power Development Company Ikram Naveed has confessed to embezzling Rs500 million in three different government companies and departments, The News...www.thenews.com.pk
Even Rana Sanaullah admitted involvement in drug smuggling ? to meet extra expenses on politics and Lots of Imrani Monkeys danced on it
DFID kicked at the asses of Shahzad Akbar and David Rose within 4 hours after the publication in Daily Mail. Following rebuttal from DFID was literally a slipper lloadedwith Shit on the face of Imran Khan and his followers like you. Just read it your self please
“The UK’s financial support to ERRA over this period was for payment by results – which means we only gave money once the agreed work, which was primarily focused on building schools, was completed, and the work audited and verified.
“The UK taxpayer got exactly what it paid for and helped the vulnerable victims of a devastating earthquake. We are confident our robust systems protected UK taxpayers from fraud.”
UK aid rebuts Mail on Sunday story on support for earthquake victims – DFID in the news
News and updates from the Department for International Development
This is the part where I am not able to comprehend if i am talking to a sensible human being or a Psycho. And I am getting tired of this Repeated BS. I will try to answer to all of your 4 nonsense Qs. But I have no hopesShahbaz filed a defamation lawsuit seeking damages, cost and apology from the newspaper from wrongful allegation of corruption, money laundering etc. That's what all claimant in defamation lawsuit seek and are entailed too either through court of law or even in out of court settlement (if wrongfully accused).
Shabaz sharif and family neither was able to;
1. Refute evidence presented by Daily Mail.
2. Wasn't awarded defamation lawsuit
3. Paid all their costs and partial cost of Daily Mail too.
4. Daily Mail didn't apologies to sharif for calling them thief, money launderer, etc etc
If sharif had nothing to hide they would have refuted daily mail evidence and won the defamation law suit from court, be awarded damages and costs from court and gotten Daily Mail to clarify that we accused sharifs of stealing, money laundering, fake tts, these claims are wrong and we apologies to them for the wrong claims and distress caused by them. Even on out of court settlement they would have gotten damages, costs and explicit apology for accusing them of corruption and money laundering. Instead they were in a hurry to the settle the matter out of court on publications terms.

1: How the hell do you know what evidence were presented by daily Mail. Can you show me those ???
2: I dont understand what you mean by "wasn't awarded Law Suit". The Case was listed for proceeding. Things were in progress. What other hell was required to be done here.
3: This is where I say you guys are ultimate Jahils. The cost that SS had to Pay to Daily Mail was to end the mutually agreed Stay. For hell sake take your head out of ass of Imran Riyaz and read the Page-2 and Para-2 of the court order. Pleeeas Read it. ?
4: All I can say is that it is a matter of your low IQ and. Coming down to your level of understanding --- once again, I will say if SS was still "thief, money launderer, etc etc" then whole article should have not been removed. It could have corrected the NAB case portion only. But everything has been taken off.
And Please chunney Kaakey try to understand that out-of-court settlement was done by Daily mail also. SS only aim was to be exonerated from the Bakwas that Shahzad Akbar fed to David rose. That is what the paper has done. If you have any problem with that, then go to UK court and restart the case and keep me informed with all that you get. That is tha last humble request i can do man.