Dear Haider , may be we are looking at the same thing from different angles and only time can tell us which view angle was the right one.
So instead of tabeling my own views , I would respond to your questions.
1. I don't think so that Nawaz has any criminal background and if so kindly provide me with substantiated and objective evidence.
2.Unfortunately or fortunately , the judiciary is something different from "Maula Jatt" which can punish people with his usual
Gandasa on the spot. Their is a whole set of rules which the judiciary has to be follow and it has its own jurisprudence which is defined by the constitution of Pakistan. The judiciary can not take justice in its hands but keep on providing justice while abiding by the constitution and public law of the country. It hardly needs to reminded that all the developed countries have flourished by upholding their constitutions and safeguarding its integrity. Zardari's cases were pardoned by Musharaf through the national reconciliation ordinance and Zardari got elected before the Supreme court declared NRO null and void. So Zardari was enjoying presidential immunity even when NRO was thrashed by the Supreme court as he was the President incumbent. Here is what the constitution has to say about presidential immunity under article 248.
Article 248.
| (2) | No criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted or continued against the President or a Governor in any court during his term of office. |
| |
| (3) | No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President or a Governor shall issue from any court during his term of office. |
| |
| (4) | No civil proceedings in which relief is claimed against the President or a Governor shall be instituted during his term of office in respect of anything done by or not done by him in his personal capacity whether before or after he enters upon his office unless, at least sixty days before the proceedings are instituted, notice in writing has been delivered to him, or sent to him in the manner prescribed by law, stating the nature of the proceedings, the cause of action, the name, description and place of residence of the party by whom the proceedings are to be instituted and the relief which the party claims.
3. The Pakistani law does apply to all the rulers no matter who. For example , in Asghar khan case , the Supreme court issued a verdict against many politicians who were beneficiaries of Mehran bank. The list included Mian Nawaz Sharif as well.
http://dawn.com/2012/11/08/sc-issues-detailed-verdict-of-asghar-khan-case/ |
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
It is damn easy to see why you are not grasping the issues. Where should we start.
Let's say, Zardari's cases were already decided in the Swiss courts before he became the President. He was a convicted felon, declared by an international court.
Now please tell us, who elected him as a President of Pakistan despite him not been illegible to hold the office?
Didn't your PMLN voted in his favor?
He has plenty of other conviction and have spent the time in jail. So did the Noora's but in Pakistan the process it, once they get convicted, they say it was political. And to clear their name during their tenure they start their own cleaning mill and come out of it all bright and clean without any sticking marks. This is the story of Pakistan for last 40 years. No wonder each party says they are innocent.
I have already written in my article, the Sharifs courts have started, we would see them coming out clean, while their appointed courts and NAB chairman declare them innocent of all wrong doings.
I am not going to go in to details about Nooras, just one case is enough, Nawaz has over 8 billions outstanding as loans, which are illegally on stay orders, even though stay order is only for 6 months and after the period it lapses, but Pakistan's judiciary is the best in the world. What can we say.
This alone should have rendered both Sharifs disqualified from taking part in the elections.
In one of my articles I have quoted all the CPC sections under which it is a criminal act to provide a property as collateral which is not wholly owned by you.
The question is who is going to apply the law, when the law makers are your arse lickers and appointed by you. If the judges take orders from you on the phone to decide the cases. Only one case to influence the justice is enough to disqualify both brothers. They don't have the guts to deny the evidence. But they can buy the judges. CJ is already singing from the same sheet. Long live Pakistan and its justice.
You are hundred percent right, Zardari and Sharifs are innocent of all blames. Just one question would solve all the issues, if you are brave enough. Just tell me how both of them live like Kings without having enough declared assets and income. If you want I can go step by step with you if you find it difficult to add 2+2=4.:lol::lol:
