Have No Position on Kashmir Issue: Arab League

ganesh177

Citizen
Both the events in past 3 days. Good news. (clap)

Have No Position on Kashmir Issue: Arab League


Three days after the European Union delegation distanced itself from the resolution of Kashmir issue, the Arab League today said it has "no position" vis-a-vis the issue.

"League of Arab States has no position on the specific question of Jammu and Kashmir...We look forward for peaceful coexistence, tolerance and dialogue among different civilisations," Arab League Ambassador to India Ahmed Salem al Wahishi told reporters on the sidelines of a conference here.

Wahishi refused to elaborate on his statement.

The Arab League Ambassador's statement comes three days after a European Union delegation led by the Union's Ambassador to India Danielle Smajda said the Kashmir issue has to be resolved by the people living in the region themselves.

Wahishi said the Arab League wanted peace in West Asia and the entire continent.

"We want peace to last in West Asia, in South Asia and in whole of the continent," he said.

Earlier speaking at the "Peace Conference" organised by the Jammu and Kashmir Peace Foundation, Wahishi called for an end to the Israeli "occupation" of Arab territories and supported the call for Palestinian freedom.

"We also took this opportunity to express our thanks to the Indian government for their principled position in efforts for justice and peaceful solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict based on international legitimacy and the Arab peace initiative for Palestinian independence and two-state solution," Wahishi said.

In his speech, the Ambassador said Kashmir is the "most preferred tourist place in the world."

"It is a real paradise," he said adding "the state of Jammu and Kashmir has passed through the violent situation of confusion and hatred for the last 20 years. We follow these sad events."

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?722102


EU envoys call off meeting with Geelani


Srinagar, May 14: In a surprise move, the visiting delegation of the European Union envoys Friday cancelled their proposed meeting with Hurriyat Conference (G) chairman Syed Ali Shah apparently for his condemnation of the Osama bin Laden’s killing and organising here the Al Qaeda chief’s funeral prayers in absentia.
The five member EU delegation on a visit to Jammu and Kashmir to assess the situation was scheduled to meet Geelani at his Hyderpora residence this afternoon. However half an hour before the meeting was to commence, the EU delegation conveyed to the amalgam, through the state’s protocol officer, that the meeting has been called off.
In a statement faxed to Greater Kashmir, EU delegation said; “A meeting was initially planned for the May 14 with Syed Ali Shah Geelani, but given the latest events, the EU delegation considers it inopportune to hold the meeting.”
Although the EU delegation didn’t refer to Geelani’s stance on Osama killing, but sources close to the delegation said that holding funeral prayers of Al Qaeda chief in absentia by Geelani was the primary reason for the cancellation of the meeting.
Reacting to the EU action, Hurriyat (G) termed the decision as unfortunate, saying that “by staying away, they have dishonoured the majority will of Kashmiris”.
“We have made it clear that we can have difference with the ways of Osama, but disrespecting his body was a grave human rights violation. We were expecting that EU which claims to be a champion of human rights would also raise its voice against this shameful incident,” Hurriyat (G) spokesman Ayaz Akbar said.
Meanwhile, the EU delegation also skipped a meeting with the Kashmir Bar Association, whom they were scheduled to meet at 4:00 pm here.
“We were informed by in-charge protocol and security to the delegation that the meeting stands cancelled,” General Secretary of Bar Association GN Shaheen told Greater Kashmir.
“The members of the visiting delegation are believed to be on fact finding mission to Jammu and Kashmir, but either the delegation members are not being allowed to meet the relevant and concerned sections of the society or they don’t want to know the truth about the ground situation in Jammu and Kashmir,” Shaheen said.
Meanwhile, the Bar has dispatched memorandum to European Union High Representative and vice president of its delegation to India to convey their displeasure over calling off their meet and to seek their intervention in resolution of Kashmir issue.
The handout issued by EU however didn’t mention the reasons for the cancellation of their meeting with Bar.
When contacted, First Secretary of EU Philipp Gross said that they cannot comment over it. “We are not authorized to talk about this, but we have issued a statement regarding cancellation of meeting with Geelani,” he said.
The delegation today called on Minister for Health, Sham Lal Sharma and discussed several issues regarding health sector with him.
The Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society (JKCCS) also submitted a report on “custodial killings, disappearances and the killings in Valley” to the EU delegation, last evening.
The delegation also called on the state Congress chief Prof Saifuddin Soz and the Director General of police Kuldeep Khoda here today.
The visiting EU delegation comprised Ambassador of European Union to India Daniele Smadja, Ambassador of Ireland Kenneth Thompson, Ambassador of Belgium Pierre Vaesen, First Secretary EU Philipp Gross and Attache EU Anne Vaugier-Chatterge.

http://greaterkashmir.com/news/2011/May/15/eu-envoys-call-off-meeting-with-geelani-58.asp
 

Unicorn

Banned
It is very fair position by the league since UN had already voided the resolution because Pakistan did not full fill its obligation in the AGREEMENT under UN resolution.
 

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
It is very fair position by the league since UN had already voided the resolution because Pakistan did not full fill its obligation in the AGREEMENT under UN resolution.

Where it says in the UN record the resolution is void?
 
Why is that only Indian news papers have published this news and no other international newspapers added this news in their publications? Show me a single arab newspaper which added this news. It's a sheer propaganda by Indian media and there is no need to fall in to this propaganda. It's an incorrect news.
 

butt47jk

Banned
Jews have a right to their homeland.I fully support the Jews against the treacherous and backstabbing arabs.The filthy arabs duly get what they deserve a good beating by the few.Judaism was born in the current land claimed by the Palestinians so rightfully belong to the land..
 

butt47jk

Banned
Pakistan should open a Israeli embassy and create a friendly atmosphere with the. It's funny how the Indians are friendly with the arabs,Israelis,AMERICANS and the Russians..We too should open up our horizon..
 

paki-lover

MPA (400+ posts)
Kashmire hum kashmiroo ka hai humay kesi arabe ya europeen ki help ki zaroorat nahi hum india ki hips mai itna bada danda dain gay kashmire sey dum daba key bagay ga baigart hindu
 

Unicorn

Banned
Where it says in the UN record the resolution is void?

Pakistan did not fulfilled its obligations under chapter 5 (binding resolution) 1948. Under Simla accord Mr. Bhutto and Indra Gandhi agreed to resolve the issue bilaterally. There were other resolution by UN under chaper 6 (non-binding).
 

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Pakistan did not fulfilled its obligations under chapter 5 (binding resolution) 1948. Under Simla accord Mr. Bhutto and Indra Gandhi agreed to resolve the issue bilaterally. There were other resolution by UN under chaper 6 (non-binding).

I did'nt ask for your opinion and commentary. Show us where it says in UN record resolution is void?
 

ASQR1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
It is very fair position by the league since UN had already voided the resolution because Pakistan did not full fill its obligation in the AGREEMENT under UN resolution.

Here we go agasn, Pakistasn did full fill the requirement by U.N. Pakistan was was at the Sri Nagar airport and withdrew by the order of than Prime minister Liaqat Ali Khan to the present postion, it is India who did not ful fill the requirement of U.N.

Besides there was a report recently on this forum that India claimed that Maharaja signed the declation but as per the forum post Maharaja was trevaling on the exect day India claim about signing of declaration.

When would India learn to stop lies speak the truth and leearn to live in peace WITH ITS NIEGHBOURS. when...........................................................................

(serious)
 
Last edited:

Unicorn

Banned
I did'nt ask for your opinion and commentary. Show us where it says in UN record resolution is void?
[SIZE=-1]

Read the details

http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/unipombackgr.html [/SIZE]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[SIZE=-1]Termination of UNIPOM[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]On 26 February 1966, the Secretary-General reported that the withdrawal of the troops by India and Pakistan had been completed on schedule on 25 February, and that the withdrawal provisions of the Security Council's resolutions had thus been fulfilled by the two parties. With regard to withdrawals, the responsibilities of the Secretary-General's representative came to an end on 28 February, and his mission ceased on that date. As planned, UNIPOM was terminated on 22 March 1966 and the 59 additional observers appointed in September 1965 to the Military Observer Group were gradually withdrawn. [/SIZE]
[/FONT]
 

ASQR1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
[SIZE=-1]Read the details[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/unipombackgr.html [/SIZE]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]Termination of UNIPOM[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]On 26 February 1966, the Secretary-General reported that the withdrawal of the troops by India and Pakistan had been completed on schedule on 25 February, and that the withdrawal provisions of the Security Council's resolutions had thus been fulfilled by the two parties. With regard to withdrawals, the responsibilities of the Secretary-General's representative came to an end on 28 February, and his mission ceased on that date. As planned, UNIPOM was terminated on 22 March 1966 and the 59 additional observers appointed in September 1965 to the Military Observer Group were gradually withdrawn. [/SIZE][/FONT]

Well than the question is does India wants peace or it does not, let us not beat arround the bush and make peace without delay , one human killed is one too many. Delaying tectics will one day may bring caos, Kashmirias have had enough so make peace as per the wishes of kashmiris. Biggest Democray should put its money where its mouth is.

As for as withdrawl is cioncerned It is wrong to blame Pakistan unilateerally, Pakistan is a party and in any decision Pakistan's input is extremely vital before final dicision all matter can and should be opened and discussed as needed. and than clarified, as for Arabs are concerned we will do the right thing as Muslims .
 
Last edited:

Unicorn

Banned
Here we go agasn, Pakistasn did full fill the requirement by U.N. Pakistan was was at the Sri Nagar airport and withdrew by the order of than Prime minister Liaqat Ali Khan to the present postion, it is India who did not ful fill the requirement of U.N.

Besides there was a report recently on this forum that India claimed that Maharaja signed the declation but as per the forum post Maharaja was trevaling on the exect day India claim about signing of declaration.

When would India learn to stop lies speak the truth and leearn to live in peace WITH ITS NIEGHBOURS. when...........................................................................

(serious)
You got to throw your history books in the garbage and read the actual documents. Go to UN web site and find 1948 resolution Document 47. Where it clearly states that Pakistan went to UN and agreed to these conditions. Tell me when did Pakistani army withdrew from Kashmir.

As far accession is concerned take it with lord Mountbatten who accepted the document.

A - RESTORATION OF PEACE AND ORDER

The Government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavors:

  1. To secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purposes of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State;
  2. To make known to all concerned that the measures indicated in this and the following paragraphs provide full freedom to all subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste, or party, to express their views and to vote on the question of the accession of the State, and that therefore they should co-operate in
 

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Termination of UNIPOM
On 26 February 1966, the Secretary-General reported that the withdrawal of the troops by India and Pakistan had been completed on schedule on 25 February, and that the withdrawal provisions of the Security Council's resolutions had thus been fulfilled by the two parties. With regard to withdrawals, the responsibilities of the Secretary-General's representative came to an end on 28 February, and his mission ceased on that date. As planned, UNIPOM was terminated on 22 March 1966 and the 59 additional observers appointed in September 1965 to the Military Observer Group were gradually withdrawn.

Dishonesty is in your blood. This is in regard to 1965 war and parties withdrawing to pre 1965 war borders. We are discussing resolution on Kashmir, pull the other one.
 

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
You got to throw your history books in the garbage and read the actual documents. Go to UN web site and find 1948 resolution Document 47. Where it clearly states that Pakistan went to UN and agreed to these conditions. Tell me when did Pakistani army withdrew from Kashmir.

As far accession is concerned take it with lord Mountbatten who accepted the document.

A - RESTORATION OF PEACE AND ORDER

The Government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavors:

  1. To secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purposes of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State;
  2. To make known to all concerned that the measures indicated in this and the following paragraphs provide full freedom to all subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste, or party, to express their views and to vote on the question of the accession of the State, and that therefore they should co-operate in

This is the actual resolution;

Having considered the complaint of the Government of India concerning the dispute over the State of Jammu and Kashmir, having heard the representative of India in support of that complaint and the reply and counter complaints of the representative of Pakistan,

Being strongly of opinion that the early restoration of peace and order in Jammu and Kashmir in essential and that India and Pakistan should do their utmost to bring about cessation of all fighting,

Noting with satisfaction that both India and Pakistan desire that the question of the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan would be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite,
Considering that the continuation of the dispute is likely to endanger international peace and security,

Reaffirms its resolution 38 (1948) of 17 January 1948;

Resolves that the membership of the Commission established by its resolution 39 (1948) of 20 January 1948, shall be increased to five and shall include, in addition to the membership mentioned in that Resolution, representatives of ....and ..., and that if the membership of the commission has not been completed within ten days from the date of the adoption of this resolution the President of the Council may designate such other Member or Members of the United Nations as are required to complete the membership of five;
Instructs the Commission to proceed at once to the Indian sub-continent and there place its good offices and mediation at the disposal of the Governments of India and Pakistan with a view to facilitating the taking of the necessary measures, both with respect to the restoration peace and order and to the holding of a plebiscite by the two Governments, acting in co-operation with one another and with the Commission, and further instructs the Commission to keep the Council informed of the action taken under the resolution; and, to this end,

Recommends to the Governments of India and Pakistan the following measures as those which in the opinion of the Council and appropriate to bring about a cessation of the fighting and to create proper conditions for a free and impartial plebiscite to decide whether the State of Jammu and Kashmir is to accede to India or Pakistan.

What you produced were the recommendations not the actual resolution. Resolution affirmed the earlier resolutions of January and asks to create conditions for free and impartial plebiscite. This never done by India. You still have over 700000 military men in Kashmir against the will of the people. They are fighting against you not against Pakistan. So from whom they want freedom, and out of their area? Against the resolution, you call Kashmir an integral part of India, even though UN recognised it as a disputed territory and wants a free and fair plebiscite.

Free and impartial, do you understand this? Let the Kashmirs free, they are the ones who are fighting you for over 63 years and demanding you leave their area.