Courts can't announce verdicts to please someone, says CJ Jamali
- Thread starter naveed
- Start date
Inhain Qadri ke murredon ki shalwarain nazar aati theen lekin Panama ke chor ki chori nazar na aa saki...This judiciary is a big scam....
Salman Asalam Noora Butt had nothing to say any more after he said he had no money trail...The case could've been decided right there but this Cheap Justice of Pakistan put a monkey wrench and raised the formation of commission question and then adjourned the court till the next year....WHAT A SCAM....
Wake Up Pakistan
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
اس جج کا بھی یہی حال ہوگا۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔
یہ تمام جج ابھی تک ساٹھ کی دہائی میں زندہ ہیں۔ حالانکہ یہ اکسویں صدی ہے۔ آج کی نسل کی آنکھوں میں ایکسرے مشینز لگیں ہیں جن سے کوئی نہیں بچ سکتا اور نہ ہی وہ کسی کو چھوڑتے۔
یہ تمام جج ابھی تک ساٹھ کی دہائی میں زندہ ہیں۔ حالانکہ یہ اکسویں صدی ہے۔ آج کی نسل کی آنکھوں میں ایکسرے مشینز لگیں ہیں جن سے کوئی نہیں بچ سکتا اور نہ ہی وہ کسی کو چھوڑتے۔
No one was expecting him to favour anyone. If he had some courage, only expectation from him was to follow the truth and announce a judgment. He was so chicken that he ran away evendors before his time was up. You don't become great by just giving sermons. You have to walk the talk.
ninetykman
Minister (2k+ posts)
Isnt it clear that Money was looted and properties were bought. What other proof are needed. Where is the money trail.
right sir ,pakistan me darhi bahut kam karti hai .(bigsmile)
sohaibmehmood
Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
>>>>Courts can't announce verdicts to please someone, says CJ Jamali
There is bias in the statement of CJ..
Justice is not done based on pleasing or not pleasing someone.
It is one based on evidence presented in the court.
If defendants are unable to present evidence then charge against them is correct and so defendant is guilty.
Prosecution has presented their case, specially their new team handled the case very well in the last half of their deliberation.....
They presented their case to such an extend that defendants were made to spell the truth which was in the form of their admittance that CM lied in NA while addressing to NA and to the Nation. This is the biggest admission of a crime under article 61 and 62 by any other defendant in the history of Pakistan.
Court cannot go blind or deaf to this crime admittance in the SC of Pakistan. This the most potent evidence which is enough to send PM (back) to jail.
I think 20 million people of Pakistan know that and so CJ of Pakistan cannot fool anyone but himself.
There is bias in the statement of CJ..
Justice is not done based on pleasing or not pleasing someone.
It is one based on evidence presented in the court.
If defendants are unable to present evidence then charge against them is correct and so defendant is guilty.
Prosecution has presented their case, specially their new team handled the case very well in the last half of their deliberation.....
They presented their case to such an extend that defendants were made to spell the truth which was in the form of their admittance that CM lied in NA while addressing to NA and to the Nation. This is the biggest admission of a crime under article 61 and 62 by any other defendant in the history of Pakistan.
Court cannot go blind or deaf to this crime admittance in the SC of Pakistan. This the most potent evidence which is enough to send PM (back) to jail.
I think 20 million people of Pakistan know that and so CJ of Pakistan cannot fool anyone but himself.
