Ansar Abbasi Nexus With PML-N In Making Fake Scandals انصار شریف یارانہ

[lllcolumbuslll]

?????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? ????? ???

ager gheeder tha to aaj sher hai. jis nay us ko bhejaa aaj wo ishtihaari hai aur bahir chupa betha hai. badala liyaa aur aaj sher pakistan mein hai. ab bolo. aur musharaf ka saath denay wala gheeder aaj bhi gheeder aur us nay musharaf ko bhi gheeder bana dia....ha ahaha hahahahaahahaha hahahahahhaha hahh

 

[Jury]

Sawal gundum jawab chana

You just used this idiom, for the sake of idiom.
​

You talk on the basis of proof and compared Zardari case with MQM.
But, nothing was happened with MQM as has been happening in Zardari's case.

MQM was not in the govt, when was fighting his case.
MQM not finished the case, as was done by CM Punjab and Khadim-e-Aala of Punjab.
Soon he became CM in 2008. Cases which was built in Musharraf era, he finished.

But, from 19th June, 1992 to 12th October, 1999.
Five Prime Minister came, but policy was not changed against MQM, nor cases were with drawn.

 

[Rathore]

?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ?? .?? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? .????? ?? ??? ??.????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?? .???? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ???.?? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ???. ??? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ?? . ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ?????? .

 

[Rathore]

?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ?? .?? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? .????? ?? ??? ??.????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?? .???? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ???.?? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ???. ??? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ?? . ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ?????? .

ager gheeder tha to aaj sher hai. jis nay us ko bhejaa aaj wo ishtihaari hai aur bahir chupa betha hai. badala liyaa aur aaj sher pakistan mein hai. ab bolo. aur musharaf ka saath denay wala gheeder aaj bhi gheeder aur us nay musharaf ko bhi gheeder bana dia....ha ahaha hahahahaahahaha hahahahahhaha hahh

 

[Abdul Allah]

You just used this idiom, for the sake of idiom.
​

You talk on the basis of proof and compared Zardari case with MQM.
But, nothing was happened with MQM as has been happening in Zardari's case.

MQM was not in the govt, when was fighting his case.
MQM not finished the case, as was done by CM Punjab and Khadim-e-Aala of Punjab.
Soon he became CM in 2008. Cases which was built in Musharraf era, he finished.

But, from 19th June, 1992 to 12th October, 1999.
Five Prime Minister came, but policy was not changed against MQM, nor cases were with drawn.

No It is not.

Banaizir Govt was not able to prove anything against Nawaz
Nawaz was not able to prove anything on Banizir
so it is same my dear but you just need to use different AINAK with out any color on it

 

[Jury]

No It is not.

Banaizir Govt was not able to prove anything against Nawaz
Nawaz was not able to prove anything on Banizir
so it is same my dear but you just need to use different AINAK with out any color on it

Scenario of MQM was different.
As I mentioned 5 PM were changed from 19th June, 1992 to 12 October, 1999.
But, policy didn't change regarding MQM.

 

[Abdul Allah]

Scenario of MQM was different.
As I mentioned 5 PM were changed from 19th June, 1992 to 12 October, 1999.
But, policy didn't change regarding MQM.

Policy did not changed Regarding MQM
Any REASON??? you tell.

and by they way MQM was part of GOVT under those 5PM every time. (except one time) Am i wrong?
So what does that mean ????

 

[Jury]

Policy did not changed Regarding MQM
Any REASON??? you tell.

and by they way MQM was part of GOVT under those 5PM every time. (except one time) Am i wrong?
So what does that mean ????

1) Policy not changed, because, they don't like MQM.
But, they were not able to prove despite all the resources and efforts, which they were claiming about MQ.

2) MQM was the part of the govt before operation was started.
MQM were part of the govt before Hakeem Saeed Murder allegation.

 

[Abdul Allah]

1) Policy not changed, because, they don't like MQM.
But, they were not able to prove despite all the resources and efforts, which they were claiming about MQ.

2) MQM was the part of the govt before operation was started.
MQM were part of the govt before Hakeem Saeed Murder allegation.

I am asking one question
During those 5 PM how many times MQM was part of GOVT

 

[Jury]

I am asking one question
During those 5 PM how many times MQM was part of GOVT

Only before the operation.
1) MQM was part, before 19th June, 1992.
2) MQM was part, before operation after murder allegation of Hakeem Saeed murder.

MQM was not the part of the govt in Benazir Govt.