Jee bilkul pata hai - aik lafz badal denay say kuch bhi nahin hota. Underlying message remains the same. Kabhi aapnay fiqh aur ahadith key kitabain parheen hain? Have you not read how scholars like Ibn Hajr Al 'Asqalani states in categorical terms that he is a
muqallid of the Shafi'i madhdhab? Or Imam Nawawi saying the same? Have you never read how Mullah Ali Qari states in categorical terms that he does
taqlid of the Hanafi Madhdhab? Or have you not read the the words of Ibn Taymiyyah where he states in very CLEAR words that he is
muqallid of the hanbali madhdhab?
Yahi toh mas'ala hai ahl-e-hadith/salafiyon ka. They have an allergy against some words (like taqlid, ash'ari, fiqh, tasawwuf etc) and they misconstrue everything out of this. Bhai meray, agar aapnay waqai main deen ko sahih tarha samjha hota uar parha hota then you would know the following:
1- Historically, the
ahl al-hadith were the Shafi'i muhaddithin/fuqaha.
2- The Hanafi jurists and muhaddithin were referred to as
ahl ar-ra'y.
3- Both groups initially had a lot of debate amongst one another (heated ones at that) until they got a sound understanding of each others
manhaj (methodology) and started appreciating one another.
4- The above debates took place between 200 AH - 350 AH.
5- If you were to simply open the books of hadith (such as the books regarding
'ilm ar-rijal) then you would see how each and EVERY scholar of Islam was a follower of a madhdhab!
Like I said, salafis have a very superficial understanding of religious literature and as they are being met in debate with the 'ulama and they are expanding their own reading, they are seeing the folly of their own ways.
Tags: [MENTION=23319]Temojin[/MENTION], [MENTION=14890]mrk123[/MENTION]
Ittiba nahi taqleed karty hain aur ap ko achi tarha maloom hy k in dono main kia farq hay
