Siraj ul Haq declares Transparency International report as authentic
- Thread starter Amin Khan 1
- Start date
Cyber_Security
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
But Imran Khan will not be aware of Transparency International report because he doesn't read newspapers. Ask Siddique Jaan to never discuss Transparency International report on his YouTube video and Imran Khan will never find out about this report. Imran Khan and PTI supporters only watch Siddique Jaan YouTube videos.
Cyber_Security
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Actually to add further, no corrupt Pakistani gives a flying fuck what the transparency international report says about Pakistan.
yeh daardhi topi wala yaqeen rakhta hai quran e pak par. jo sab se zyada authentic hai. agar yeh iss ayat ko samajh le tau saari munaafqat khatam ho jaye gi aur Allah swt raazi aur mulk taraqqi kere ga.
يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ ۖ فَإِ
تَنَٰزَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا
Maududi Urdu
اے لوگو جو ایمان لائے ہوئے، اطاعت کرو اللہ کی اور اطاعت کرو رسول کی اور اُن لوگوں کی جو تم میں سے صاحب امر ہوں، پھر اگر تمہارے درمیان کسی معاملہ میں نزاع ہو جائے تو اسے اللہ اور رسول کی طرف پھیر دو اگر تم واقعی اللہ اور روز آخر پر ایمان رکھتے ہو یہی ایک صحیح طریق کار ہے اور انجام کے اعتبار سے بھی بہتر ہے
يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ ۖ فَإِ
تَنَٰزَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا
Maududi Urdu
اے لوگو جو ایمان لائے ہوئے، اطاعت کرو اللہ کی اور اطاعت کرو رسول کی اور اُن لوگوں کی جو تم میں سے صاحب امر ہوں، پھر اگر تمہارے درمیان کسی معاملہ میں نزاع ہو جائے تو اسے اللہ اور رسول کی طرف پھیر دو اگر تم واقعی اللہ اور روز آخر پر ایمان رکھتے ہو یہی ایک صحیح طریق کار ہے اور انجام کے اعتبار سے بھی بہتر ہے
Citizen X
(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Score dropped from 33 to 32, in these turmoil times really not shocking or ground breaking. Big corruption has stopped or slowed down to a trickle if any and slowly but surely this will have a trickle down effect too.
As if there was no coorruption in khota sharif and mr. 10% era. It will go down slowly because people have been groomed to consider corruption as part of their lives.
miafridi
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Just for political agendas these so called Islamic leaders/scholars don't refrain from spreading lies and deceit.
Siraj Ul haq k is video main 2 jhoot(Jo kisi Mazhabi leader/scholar ko suit nhi karta).
1) Pehlay sirf Najaiz kam karwanay k liye corruption hoti thi(anyone agree to that)?
2) Corruption is government main dugni hogai hai(CPI Index of pakistan dropped from 33 to 32, how is it dugni)?
Not to mention that if you dig deeper into the matter the reasons for such decline or rise can be different just for example if it is reported that Crime rate has doubled in a City doesn't means crimes have gone up, but it might also mean that good governance has gone up and the rate of crime registration has been made transparent and easy which is why it has gone up.
Siraj Ul haq k is video main 2 jhoot(Jo kisi Mazhabi leader/scholar ko suit nhi karta).
1) Pehlay sirf Najaiz kam karwanay k liye corruption hoti thi(anyone agree to that)?
2) Corruption is government main dugni hogai hai(CPI Index of pakistan dropped from 33 to 32, how is it dugni)?
Not to mention that if you dig deeper into the matter the reasons for such decline or rise can be different just for example if it is reported that Crime rate has doubled in a City doesn't means crimes have gone up, but it might also mean that good governance has gone up and the rate of crime registration has been made transparent and easy which is why it has gone up.
Yes, Siraj knows more than this Harvard law professor and an expert on anticorruption:
Second, and perhaps more important, anticorruption efforts take time to be effective, and it would be a mistake to write them off as a failure just because they don’t produce an immediate, detectable improvement in a country’s CPI score. I know TI means well here–they want to emphasize the seriousness of the problem and the urgency of devoting more energy and resources to combating corruption. But as we’ve noted on this blog previously (see, for example, here and here), interpreting a lack of change in the CPI as evidence that anticorruption efforts aren’t working can be counterproductive: They can be demoralizing, and breed more cynicism and fatalism, attitudes which themselves make corruption harder to control. Now, if the CPI data really did show conclusively that anticorruption efforts aren’t working, then the fact that spreading that message might have demoralizing effects might not be a good argument for suppressing or downplaying this truth. But since a lack of statistically significant changes in the CPI data does not clearly show that anticorruption efforts have “stalled,” putting this spin on the data is a rhetorical choice, and I fear a misguided one.
A Reminder: Year-to-Year CPI Comparisons for Individual Countries are Meaningless, Misleading, and Should Be Avoided
Today, Transparency International released its new Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) for 2018. At some point, hopefully soon, I’ll have time to look closely at the new data and accompanying …
globalanticorruptionblog.com
