Jack Sparrow!! You Qadyaane well said about MH...The only person you can like is Mirza Lannati
As usual, Jamat-e-Islami using the same old ghissa pitta tactic.
Ager jawab na ho tu aglay ko Amreeki agent keh do!
@BuTurabi @mrk123 @moazzamniaz
Apkay comments ka intezar hay! ;)
So your answer is that no one should ask JI any tough questions regarding their point of view or conduct while in government unless MQM answers some questions first?
What has MQM got to do with questions dealing with MMA government in KPK and the TTP?
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]
I think you have misread the answer and reached the wrong conclusion. I said it is "easy" to ask tough questions to JI (NOT that don't ask any questions to JI as you wrongly imply in your response) [HI]Afterall is JI currently in power? Are any of their policies being implemented?
[/HI]
I am pointing out the cowardly nature of this anchor, who has never asked the tough questions of why a foreigner is leading MQM? Why is he outside the country.
From your tone I can safely imply that you would back any party which has the backing of the west.
Munawar Hussan was not chief of JI then, and certainly not the leader of MMA. Moreover, Mushraf came as savior of Pakistan and lot of people got carried away by his Mr clean immage untill, he showed his real face behind him. I am not defending every wrong decision by JI but I am defending MH's right to stop a rude anchor's politically motivated interview
The question regarding NATO supplies was relevant to when the JI was n power with MMA.
JI is a political party and they have to reply to questions whether they are in power or not. Im not a PTI supporter but PTI has been facing tougher questions despite having NEVER been in power.
The cowardly nature was actually shown by JI qaid for walking out instead of facing the questions.
The fact of the matter is Qazi Hussain Ahmed deals with such questions too but he has a calculated response. Even Samia Raheel Qazi could answer these questions better than Munawer Hassan.
Okay. For me you are going off a tangent to my first post; JI means nothing to me, neither am I their supporter or backer. I am not concerned with the conduct of the JI leader in the interview. Furthermore, I do not even think they are that significant. It obviously means a lot to you.
Indeed you rightly point out that PTI are asked tough questions and they face upto them even though they are not in power. However, you actually make a good point which fits into what I was pointing out earlier there is a discrimination in the ways different parties are dealt with and this is due to fear. There is saying in Punjabi "Kanday noo koi nai chair da, agar Kanday noo chero dai, thy Kanda chuba da" in other words if you touch the thorn, the thorn will hurt. This means that an anchor like Khanzada will ask Imran or the JI chief tough questions, but in the case of MQM he will never ask those questions because it is well known fact that MQM bullies journalists and anchors. Yet the tougher questions are asked to those parties currently not in power? How many people on a daily basis are dying in Karachi? Loss of innocent life is no joke and yet the media is scared to ask the parties in power who are killing people why they are led by a foreigner! Did you see the interview Jasmeen Mansoor conducted with Altaf? It was one of the most ridiculous interviews ever seen, even she was left in an awkward situation where the whole interview was a virtual political speech.
I have no love lost for MQM. They are the most notorious heinous and ugly politicians in the whole country. I rate them even lower than the Taliban.
However Munawwar Hassan is answerable for his conduct and Shahzeb or any other anchor is responsible for their.
If an anchor doesnt ask tough questions from one person it just makes him biased. That doesnt take away the na-laiki of Shah sb. at handling the interview.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|