My friend charities are always tax free, even in Pakistan and in the West. SKMH is a charity and it doesn't have any fears of being taxed. The reason they still used off-shore accounts were to hide from people of Pakistan where they were investing. They were investing in real estate speculative adventures and that's not done in any big professional charities.
Then, the question is that the only big money project IK's ever done is the SKMH one and in that he ended up using off-shore accounts. So that proves what he considers normal. Why did he not invest that money in Pakistan just like he keeps preaching to everyone?
Then, the risk-free guarantee was only given after a media frenzy happened on the expose. It didn't exist before, and still those US$18 million have not been made good.
The point is that if Hussain uses off-shore accounts then it's wrong but when IK uses them, then it's alright? Why this double standard!
As everyone's saying here that Nawaz's London apartments existed since the 90s, my question is that when Musharraf was in power, why did he not do any action against Nawaz at the time for stealing public money and making property from it in London? That was the best time to prove Nawaz's crime, because right now it can never be done. So you need to find the answer that why did Musharraf, who is as financially clean as IK, not take it up against Nawaz at that time?
Find the answer to that my friend and enlighten me kindly when you find some answer.