Therefore no one should believe that all human works are 100% perfect or all human works are 100% crap. Both of these positions are not defendable.
True. I tried to explain this thing personally to these two Munikireen-e-hadith cultists here how Hadith works and questioning its authenticity is completely acceptable as long as one understands how Hadith was collected. I myself question a lot of Hadith for example from Kitab ul Fitn and others. To question hadith is perfectly fine but that's not their problem. The problem is these clowns here want us to believe in things like following
#1. All hadith and sunnah is 100% false. reject them without question fully blindly. To them there's no difference between apples and oranges.
#2. All hadith and sunnah was man made. The prophet never spoke a word in his life time so it's not even scientifically possible that his words or actions were memorized or recorded or passed down. It's all fake.
#3. All hadith were written down falsely with specific intent of of fabricating prophet's life.
#4. Basic concepts of Salah and Zakat etc are invalid because Quran does not cover them in detail and whatever it does is invalid.
#5. Man collected vs man made is same thing. So if i collect their nonsense in a book form it's same as me inventing it.
How do you reason with such nonsensical arguments? On top of that they're having mental breakdowns when you ask them questions about their invented beliefs because they're muniqireen e hadith as well as not Quranists as they want you to believe.
It's truly some other breed of apostates which i would have figured out eventually, but they started feeling interrogated in a police station and decided to stop answering about their beliefs.
That does not change the fact that rejecting basic pillars of islam, distorting quran to own wishes, and blindly rejecting all hadith and sunnah makes them apostates. What kind, well may be it does not matter.