Quaid-e-Azam " The secular Mussalman"

hans

Banned
The secular Mussalman
Khaled Ahmed
On September 24, 1948, after the demise of Quaid-e-Azam Mohamed Ali Jinnah, his sister Fatima Jinnah and Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan submitted a joint petition at the Karachi High Court describing Jinnah as a `Shia Khoja Mohamedan' and praying that his will be disposed of under Shia inheritance law. On February 6, 1968, after Mohtarma Fatima Jinnah's demise, her sister Shirin Bai moved an application claiming Fatima Jinnah's property under Shia inheritance law because the deceased was a Shia.

On 29 October 1970, one Hussain Ali Gangji Walji filed a suit against Shirin Bai, seeking to prove that Fatima Jinnah was in fact a Sunni, as was Jinnah, and that therefore Shirin Bai was entitled to only half the inheritance under Sunni law, the other half going to the agnate relations, that is, to the offspring of Fatima Jinnah's paternal uncle. Hussain Ali was the son of Gangji Walji, the son of Walji Poonja, Jinnah's paternal uncle.

Hussain Ali deposed that he was himself an Ismaili Shia and not anIsna-Ashari Shia. According to witness Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada, Jinnah broke from the Ismail faith in 1901 after his two sisters, Rehmat Bai and Maryam Bai, married into Sunni Muslim families. It appears that this happened because the Ismail community objected to these marriages. Also, the conversion of Isna-Ashari Shiism happened in Jinnah's immediate family, and not in the families of his two paternal uncles, Walji and Nathoo.

The case also revealed that Shirin Bai, Jinnah's other sister, too did not convert to Isna-Ashari Shiism. Possibly, she could not because her husband Jafferbhoy was an Ismaili. She left Bombay after Fatima Jinnah's death in 1967 and came to Karachi. She embraced Shiism in order to qualify for the inheritance of Fatima Jinnah under Shia law. So only the Quaid and Fatima Jinnah had abandoned the Ismaili faith. Both carefully avoided a sectarian label. Both said they were neither Shia nor Sunni, but `Mussalman'. The Quaid was at pains to gather the Muslims of India under the banner ofa general Muslim faith and not under a divisive sectarian identity.

Of Jinnah's four sisters, two married into Sunni families, but their offspring were not all Sunni. The depositions in the legal record published by Liaquat H. Merchant in his book Jinnah: A Judicial Verdict reveal that two grand-daughters of Jinnah's sister Maryam Bai, who married into a Sunni family, retained the Shia faith. Merchant, appointed by the Sindh High Court as Administrator of the Estate of the Quaid-e-Azam, is a civil lawyer in Karachi. He is the grandson of Maryam Bai, wife of Abedin Peerbhai, a Sunni. His mother Sher Bano, married to Habib Hoosain Merchant, was Maryam Bai's daughter.

The legal record is silent on Jinnah's brother Ahmed Ali. It is not clarified whether he was buried in a Sunni, Shia or Ismaili graveyard in Bombay. Merchant has kindly informed the writer that Ahmed Ali's daughter Fatima Goepfert lives in Switzerland. She had married a non-Muslim. Jinnah's daughter, Dina Wadia, a US resident, alsomarried a non-Muslim.

The leading witnesses to appear for Shirin Bai in 1968 were I.H. Ispahani, a family friend of the Quaid and his honorary secretary in 1936, and Matloobul Hassan Syed, his private secretary from 1940 to 1944. Ispahani revealed that Jinnah had told him in 1936 that he and his family had converted to Shiism after his return from England in 1894. He said that Jinnah had married Ruttie Bai by Shia ritual. He however conceded that Jinnah was opposed in the Bombay elections by a Shia Conference candidate. Ispahani was present when Fatima Jinnah died in 1967. He arranged her ghusl and janaza at Mohatta Palace according to Shia ritual. Her Sunni namaz-e-janaza was held later at the Polo Ground, after which she was buried next to the Quaid. Ritualistic Shia talqin (last advice to the deceased) was done after her body was lowered into the grave. (Jinnah had arranged for talqin for Ruttie Bai too when she died in 1929).

Matloobul Hassan Syed deposed that FatimaJinnah's faith became clear to him when he accompanied her to Mardan in the NWFP in her election campaign against General Ayub Khan. When local Shia leaders told her that they would vote for Ayub, she contended that she could represent them better as she was a Shia. Syed's biography of Jinnah, which appeared in 1945, is still rated as the best account of his political career to be written by a Pakistani.

Witness Syed Anisul Husnain, a Shia scholar, deposed that he had arranged the ghusl of the Quaid. He led his namaz-e-janaza in a room of the Governor-General's House at which Yusuf Haroon, Hashim Raza and Aftab Hatim Alvi were present, while Liaquat Ali Khan waited outside. After the Shia ritual, Maulana Shabbir Anmad Usmani, an alim of the Deoband school, known for its anti-Shia beliefs, read his janaza according to the Sunni ritual. Witnesses confirmed that after the demise of Fatima Jinnah, alam and panja (Shia symbols) were discovered from her residence, MohattaPalace.

Justice Abdul Qadir Shaikh delivered the first judgment on February 24, 1970, rejecting Fatima Jinnah's affidavit (co-signed by Liaquat Ali Khan) that the Quaid was a Shia. He found that his secular Muslim faith made him neither Shia nor Sunni. Justice Zafar Husain Mirza delivered the second judgment on December 23, 1976, striking down the Walji petition. It went to the High Court Bench of Chief Justice Abdul Hayee Kureshi. On December 23, 1984, it reversed the earlier judgements and maintained that while the Quaid was definitely not a Shia, the issue of Fatima Jinnah's persuasion was open to inquiry.

In 1965, Fatima Jinnah had moved from the Quaid's residence, Flagstaff House, to Mohatta Palace, an evacuee property she acquired in exchange for the Quaid's Bombay house. After her death, Shirin Bai moved in. After her death in 1980, a trust created by her took over, but was proceeded against by the Waljis and the Palace became deserted. In 1993, Sindh Governor Mehmood Haroon moved the High Court tosell Mohatta Palace to his government. The Rs 61.8 million it paid the court is still contested by the heirs.

Liaquat H. Merchant, himself a descendant of the Jinnah-Poonja clan, puts it thus in his book: `From the legal record, it becomes clear that the Court was inclined to repose more trust in the avowed non-sectarian public stance of the Quaid and his sister. Because of the Muslim law of succession and its either/or verdict, the sectarian question had to be considered. It is perhaps in order that the judicial verdict was finally inconclusive: the Quaid was not a Shia; he was also not a Sunni, he was simply a Muslim.

The writer is a noted Pakistani journalist. This article first appeared in `The Friday Times' (Lahore) where he is a columnist.
 

laiq

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
i will request admin to delete this post..
quaid e azam father of the nation hain, iskay elawa hamay koi gharz nhi honi chahyeh....
 
Asslam-O-Alakum

I completely not agree with Mr.Laiq and hasib and all of those who say that delete this post. I want to know why delete ?? At one side you people support democracy and another side if something not according to your wish you people say he has no right to speak. I would like to ask Mr.Laiq that what is your nation?? remember all my brothers that if you are Muslim your nation is Muslim not pakistani, your nationality is Pakistani not your nation. As long as Quaid-E-Azam concern his personality is very controversial because the history of Muhammad Ali Jinah is complicated at it start from his father name "Jinah Ponja" I have never header any other Muslim named "Jinah or Ponja" Is there anyone know any other muslim with this title of name?? But i agree that who was he is not the point to discuss whatever he did whoever he was but he was not the father of nation the father of nation is only Muhammad (S.A.W) because except Muhammad (S.A.W) none is perfect so when we have someone perfect to follow why we go other way ?? we need to follow the teaching of prophet (S.A.W) not the teaching of Quaid-E-Azam yes we are thankful to him if he devoted his life for the sake of muslims Allah will reward him. So look forward for our future not keep fighting about history. History is to learn lesson from our mistakes.
 

khalid100

Minister (2k+ posts)
Ah come on....
Seems some people cannot write anything useful. What benifit will it bring to the nation. Doesn't matter whatever sect the great Quaid was. He was a muslim and the debate should finish here. He never favored or proclaimed to be part of any sect himself.
Rest is between him and Allah.
We are all gratefull to the great Quaid for his effort in helping us get rid of the british and evil hindus.
Thats all that matters for me at least.
 

hans

Banned
The reason why I cut and paste this from a Lahore English newspaper. It was printed late 1998.

The reason is simple, if Our Quaid was liberal and had no affiliation to Radical Islam what is now been preached.
Why do we have these Mullah telling us how to govern our lives. Why not ALL MULLAH take guidance from
Quaid of our Country.

We should have enough courage and be brave to speak out against these mullah, advise them to step down or better take a hike.

Remember, Pakistan is for all, Its not constituted for any one religious sect. Every citizen has his or her rights. All are equal and no one
supersedes race or culture. All religion what ever the grounds be, should be respected.

If you want to delete this post its not my problem, what will you do with the news paper Archive that is in Lahore Library.
Burn that Library too. How Talabinic can one be.
[imran]




-
 

abdulhaseeb23

MPA (400+ posts)
look mr. hans quaid was not liberal ya he was liberal till 1932 but after 1932 when he meet with allama iqbal in round table confress in England he came back to pakistan and start working with muslim league on 2 nation theory so any person of the world who believe on two nation theory will not be a liberal
 

rizkhan

Voter (50+ posts)
Quaid-e-Azam is great,

No rubbish about him, Respect him.

Person who post this rubbish must be nehru's salah.

Quad-e-Azam Zindabad.

Pakistan Zindabad.
 

patriot

Minister (2k+ posts)
There is a lobby of so-called intellectuals who are trying to prove that the Father of the Nation was a secular and he wanted Pakistan to be a secular state. Their act of presenting Jinnah as secular instead of as a true follower of Islamic principles is influencing young generation and if this continues then our Islamic ideology is going to slowly erode away.
The factual position is that, Jinnah on many occasions had clearly and unambiguously stated that Islam would be the ideology of Pakistan. Jinnah had a personality of a true believer, who believed in the strength of the Islamic principles in shaping the destiny of a nation so such a man cannot be deemed as secular.
Allah Almighty says in the Quran: "Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) breast (33; 4)". This verse of the Quran manifests that a genuinely "faithful" person cannot have more than one object of devotion. He who worships Allah cannot worship any other object in the universe. This faith in one Allah makes the believer a single-minded person. By and by, he becomes one in his ownself. Quaid's soul was stout, his will was strong and his faith in God unflinching.
Speaking at the Karachi Bar Association on 25th January 1948 the Quaid said "The Prophet of Islam (PBUH) was a great teacher. He was a great law -giver and a great statesman. The life of the Prophet (PBUH) was simple according to those times. He was successful in everything he did from being a businessman to a ruler. The Prophet (PBUH) was the greatest man that the world had ever seen. Thirteen hundred years ago he laid the foundation of democracy".
On another occasion addressing the civil and military officers at Khaliqdina Hall Karachi, Quaid-i-Azam said, "It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules of conduct set for us by our great law-giver the Prophet (PBUH) of Islam. Let us lay the foundations of our democracy on the basis of true Islamic ideals and principles". On one occasion when a Muslim who was holding the Holy Quran asked the Quaid what laws would govern Pakistan, Quaid pointed to the Holy Quran and said that the laws were given in the book in his hands. Everyone has the right to express his or her opinion but to deny, ignore or omit facts in intellectual dishonesty cannot be condoned by any reasonable man.
Quaid-i-Azam was a true representative of Muslims. His determination was inspiring. There is no ambiguity in his behaviour. Quaid-i-Azam remained true to his essential nature. His expressions never conveyed any duality. He did not suffer from any character failing. He stood like a rock in fulfilling his mission. A man of integrity, in the field of politics, can safely look up to Quaid-i-Azam for a yardstick. Through his conduct he proved that truth and sincerity of purpose bear fruit even in politics. He could not bow before any person.
Quaid-i-Azam defeated the Congress in Gandhi's lifetime. He defeated Mountbatten, who was sent to implement Cabinet Mission Scheme. Here are his words: "But there was one man who absolutely prevented this(Cabinet Mission Scheme)and that was Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the President of Muslim League, who absolutely said 'no' from the very beginning and there was nothing I could do to make him change his mind." Quaid-I-Azam had been deputed and destined to win a separate homeland for the Muslims of the subcontinent.
He had to attain his destiny. He yielded to his illness only after the achievement of his goal - Pakistan. Quaid told his physician Dr Elahi Bakhsh that he had achieved what he struggled for adding that it was then the duty of the nation to build Pakistan into a strong and prosperous state. His job had finished.
The journey of Quaid-i-Azam's struggle is different from that of many contemporary heroes. It is different because at no stage of his struggle, the Quaid stooped to underhand means. No title could attract him. No office could tempt him. Muhammad Ali Jinnah was above all such petty considerations. He had the feeling that he had been deputed by Allah to something great for the sake of the Muslims of the subcontinent. At the Government House Peshawar, while addressing the Jirgah, Jinnah said on 17th April, 1948: "Whatever I have done, I did as a servant of Islam and only tried to perform my duty and made every possible contribution within my power to help my nation."
 

patriot

Minister (2k+ posts)
There is a lobby of so-called intellectuals who are trying to prove that the Father of the Nation was a secular and he wanted Pakistan to be a secular state. Their act of presenting Jinnah as secular instead of as a true follower of Islamic principles is influencing young generation and if this continues then our Islamic ideology is going to slowly erode away.
The factual position is that, Jinnah on many occasions had clearly and unambiguously stated that Islam would be the ideology of Pakistan. Jinnah had a personality of a true believer, who believed in the strength of the Islamic principles in shaping the destiny of a nation so such a man cannot be deemed as secular.
Allah Almighty says in the Quran: "Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his (one) breast (33; 4)". This verse of the Quran manifests that a genuinely "faithful" person cannot have more than one object of devotion. He who worships Allah cannot worship any other object in the universe. This faith in one Allah makes the believer a single-minded person. By and by, he becomes one in his ownself. Quaid's soul was stout, his will was strong and his faith in God unflinching.
Speaking at the Karachi Bar Association on 25th January 1948 the Quaid said "The Prophet of Islam (PBUH) was a great teacher. He was a great law -giver and a great statesman. The life of the Prophet (PBUH) was simple according to those times. He was successful in everything he did from being a businessman to a ruler. The Prophet (PBUH) was the greatest man that the world had ever seen. Thirteen hundred years ago he laid the foundation of democracy".
On another occasion addressing the civil and military officers at Khaliqdina Hall Karachi, Quaid-i-Azam said, "It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rules of conduct set for us by our great law-giver the Prophet (PBUH) of Islam. Let us lay the foundations of our democracy on the basis of true Islamic ideals and principles". On one occasion when a Muslim who was holding the Holy Quran asked the Quaid what laws would govern Pakistan, Quaid pointed to the Holy Quran and said that the laws were given in the book in his hands. Everyone has the right to express his or her opinion but to deny, ignore or omit facts in intellectual dishonesty cannot be condoned by any reasonable man.
Quaid-i-Azam was a true representative of Muslims. His determination was inspiring. There is no ambiguity in his behaviour. Quaid-i-Azam remained true to his essential nature. His expressions never conveyed any duality. He did not suffer from any character failing. He stood like a rock in fulfilling his mission. A man of integrity, in the field of politics, can safely look up to Quaid-i-Azam for a yardstick. Through his conduct he proved that truth and sincerity of purpose bear fruit even in politics. He could not bow before any person.
Quaid-i-Azam defeated the Congress in Gandhi's lifetime. He defeated Mountbatten, who was sent to implement Cabinet Mission Scheme. Here are his words: "But there was one man who absolutely prevented this(Cabinet Mission Scheme)and that was Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the President of Muslim League, who absolutely said 'no' from the very beginning and there was nothing I could do to make him change his mind."
He had to attain his destiny. He yielded to his illness only after the achievement of his goal - Pakistan. Quaid told his physician Dr Elahi Bakhsh that he had achieved what he struggled for adding that it was then the duty of the nation to build Pakistan into a strong and prosperous state. His job had finished.
The journey of Quaid-i-Azam's struggle is different from that of many contemporary heroes. It is different because at no stage of his struggle, the Quaid stooped to underhand means. No title could attract him. No office could tempt him. Muhammad Ali Jinnah was above all such petty considerations. He had the feeling that he had been deputed by Allah to something great for the sake of the Muslims of the subcontinent. At the Government House Peshawar, while addressing the Jirgah, Jinnah said on 17th April, 1948: "Whatever I have done, I did as a servant of Islam and only tried to perform my duty and made every possible contribution within my power to help my nation."