PTI has already won ... how ?

kbkhan1946

MPA (400+ posts)
ghaib ka ilm us zat e mubarka ko hai jo alam ul ghayoob hai aur her cheese k ilm rekhta hai dil gawahee deta hai is murtaba shaid ooper walay ne kutch mukhtalif kerne k faila ker lia hai.Aisa kabhee nahin hua kisi khuda k banda koyee khair k kam kerne k lia utha ho aur aik dum us k galay bholoon k haar dal dia gay hoon us ko Allah pukhta kerne k lia mushkoln say guzarta hai .jis k sab say barry misaal haray nabi k hai .macca k 10 sal kia thay.so imran ko 16 saal lagay hain yahaan tak aatay .kia aap samujhtay Wo Allah jo zameen aur asmanoo k malik hai is saasir k us ki baat such ker dekhay.sabr ker aur dekhtay jao wo kia kerta hai .jis k lia pakistan 90 % duain kertay Allah us kaisay na kam kerray.
 

arslan4u

Minister (2k+ posts)
Imran Khan should never make tall claims, Almighty does not like it.
Secondly its called brainwashing, jhoot itna bolo keh such lagnay lage, PPP strategy.
Imran Khan said PTI will sweep the elections Insha-Allah, see the video if you have doubt. Allah Almighty most certainly does not like people who support CRIMINALS and LOOTERS in any way and what he would do with VOTERS of these criminals, we will find out later.
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...-it-down-and-sign-it-for-Shahzaib-to-frame-it!

Noora Strategy: Jhoot itna bolo ke sach lagne lagay. (just one example: Musharraf deal pe 5 saal jhoot bola lekin end pe asliyat saamnay aa gayi)
 

khanaman

Senator (1k+ posts)
PML-N is better at this strategy than PPP. Good examples are claims about having evidence of ISI backing PTI, or the SKMT insinuations, lies about IKs house in Bani gala, tall claims about Punjab Govt. performance even though all indicators show a different story. Have to say they do it really effectively. As far as IK is concerned he is keeping the spirits of his supporters high because he is banking on momentum and spirit and not on electables. He also uses the word Insha Allah repeatedly with it.


Imran Khan should never make tall claims, Almighty does not like it.
Secondly its called brainwashing, jhoot itna bolo keh such lagnay lage, PPP strategy.
 
[h=2]Imran lambasts Sharifs for sabotaging PTI elections in Pindi[/h]


LAHORE: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan on Tuesday condemned Sharif brothers for sabotaging his party elections in Rawalpindi through police.
Addressing a hurriedly-convened press conference here on Tuesday, Khan said the Punjab police, instead of apprehending terrorists, are sealing PTIs polling stations. Terrorists are roaming free in Punjab, he said.
It is an illegal step to seal the polling station of a political party. We will approach the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on this issue.
The PTI chief said that his party would also go to the Supreme Court if required.
He accused Nawaz Sharif of hiring criminals in the police department. Sharif brothers, he said, are victimizing the PTI.
He announced that his party would hold intra-party polls in Rawalpindi on Friday.

- See more at: http://dailysahafat.com/pakistan/14...-elections-in-pindi.html#sthash.pPA0zN8T.dpuf
 

v r imran k

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
watan ki mitti gawah rehna .watan ki miti azeem hay tu azeeem tar hum bana rahay hian..gawah rahna watan ki mitti gawah rehna.....inshallah gawah rehna hum sub 09 may ko imran ko apna new primeminster chunian gy inshallah gawah rehna
 
PTI already WOn I totally agree and that prof of LUMS also confirm of PTI triumph
The writer is professor of political science at LUMS

As we move closer to the elections, political observers and analysts are going to focus on the popularity ranking of the parties, their electoral alliances, manifestos — as if they matter — and political strategies to win elections. This is the subject matter of old politic — the pragmatic politics, which is about building winnable electoral alliances. Politics is nothing but the pursuit of power, ideally for public good, and not for private ends.
Winning elections requires appropriate electoral strategies. Political leaders and parties devise strategies according to the social structures, the political culture and in light of ethnic, demographic and caste and clan characteristics of the society. At the centre of the electoral strategies, both in mature democracies as well as in emerging democracies like ours, are the voting blocs. The social and cultural differences in different societies generate various sets of voting blocs.
While women, ethnic minorities, religious groups, blue collar workers and the old and the young may constitute voting blocs in the industrial democracies, in ours it is the caste, sub-tribe and the dynastic, influential political families with large landholdings that matter. Our old-pragmatic politics focuses more on the social characteristics and influence patterns of the electoral constituencies than on national issues. This is the logic and compulsion of local contestations among the traditional political elites.
The major political parties — the PML-N and the PPP — have been in fierce competition for decades now to win over the dynastic families and through them, access the larger voting blocs of castes and village communities. How do the dynastic political families make their political choices? A good number of them have stayed with one or another political party through good and bad times. Strong party affiliation is a mark of positive political development in Pakistan that will eventually produce a two-party system. However, as is evident from recent defections from both the PML-N and the PPP — more in numbers from the latter — the dynastic families have their own sense of political pragmatism. It is the power question that impels them to affiliate with or defect from a political party. They create a stampede at the doors of a party if they feel it is likely to win and form the next government. So it is the principal of power and not the virtue of public good or any programme of positive change that keeps the political families making odious political deals.
The question to debate is, will pragmatic politics win again or lose in the face of the challenge of new politics? What is this new politics I am referring to? It is the politics of change through the political mobilisation of the people and the building of a national coalition of social groups to rise and vote against the dynastic political parties — mainly the PPP and the PML-N. This is what the Kaptaan and his PTI wish to achieve in the next elections. I believe with his optimism, personal charisma and faith in the ability of the common man, theKaptaan has rocked the dreamboat of traditional, dynastic politics. If the PTI emerges even as a third party, and even if it is not able to form the next government at any level, the politics of Pakistan will have changed forever, and for the better.
In a hung parliament, which is not unlikely, the PTI will play hardball rather than the role of a kingmaker. Its presence in the assemblies will put tremendous pressure on other parties to do better for the country than they have. It will constitute a democratic revolution if the PTI captures first or second position. Even at third, the Kaptaan will be just one stop short of winning Pakistan.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/519121/o...-new-politics/
 

topotop

Senator (1k+ posts)
yaar eik baat samajh neh ati plz zara mujhe samjhao kabhi main ney imran khan ko kisi college ki student ko beti kehte neh suna kabhi kisi college ke larke ko main ney imran khan uncle kehte neh suna imran khan ki age 60 plus
hey hum 36 years ki umar main uncle hain woh imran khan bahi kyun hey still please kuch answer do