Pakistan will not accept India as UNSC permanent member: Nawaz

CHANAKYA

Banned
really....so u tell americans...you come from a country that housed osama bin laden in a military guest house..haha..wht a joke....
By the way your avator picture is one of example of India's state sponsored terrorism, and it is quite funny that you are proud of it. In 1971 India directly interfered with Pakistan internal affairs.
 
Last edited:

betterpakistan

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
really....so u tell americans...you come from a country that housed osama bin laden in a military guest house..haha..wht a joke....
By the way your avator picture is one of example of India's state sponsored terrorism, and it is quite funny that you are proud of it. In 1971 India directly interfered with Pakistan internal affairs.

Dude NOT funny at all. Osama was killed because ISI had tipped CIA on many occasions, this leads to finally a death of Osama bin Laden.


O yes we can tell our fellow Americans to look for a real mole in the house, as it is apparent that India & RAW has nexus between TTP and ISIS terrorist. Therefore consider Indians as a common enemy, they are cockroaches and deserved to be nuked for good :)
 

CHANAKYA

Banned
pehley mulq mein itney paisey jamaa kar lo ki kisi aur mulq mein invest karney ki aukat rakh sakho....aaj tak IMF ke rehmo pey rahney walo....u dont have rights to tell us ...where we invest our money...hamara paisa....hamri marzi....purey duniya mein tabahi,terrorism ke alawa koi constructive contribution bata doh.EIK CONTRIBUTION BATA DOH...[QUOTE=bons;3065383]Tum neighbour ho is liye tumhare paisay bachane ke liye abhi bata diya hay. Warna jaisay tumhari Afghanistan main investment doob gaye hay aisay hi phir se nuqsan uthao gay. Aqalmand ke liye ishara hi kafi hota hay. Tumhara pata nahi....[/QUOTE]
 

CHANAKYA

Banned
TALKIN BOUT NUKES ND ALL..HEHE..JUST SEE SOME US CYBER AGENCY IS NOT SNOOPING ON YOU FOR TERROR ALERT....AFTER ALL HOW MANY PAKISTANIS GET DEPORTED EVERY YEAR IS AN OPEN SECRET....
really....so u tell americans...you come from a country that housed osama bin laden in a military guest house..haha..wht a joke....

Dude NOT funny at all. Osama was killed because ISI had tipped CIA on many occasions, this leads to finally a death of Osama bin Laden.


O yes we can tell our fellow Americans to look for a real mole in the house, as it is apparent that India & RAW has nexus between TTP and ISIS terrorist. Therefore consider Indians as a common enemy, they are cockroaches and deserved to be nuked for good :)
 

lurker

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Pakistan categorically stands behind the people of kashmir in terms of moral support and does not support any action against those states involved in flouting UN security resolutions on Kashmir, meant to grant Plebsicite to the Kashmiri people, which has been initiated by those countries themselves :biggthumpup:

Pakistan is the champion of Freedom and Justice and supports all such initiatives in tandem with International Laws and Norms and stands by the freedom of Kashmiris ! and the oppressed Indian women too :biggthumpup:
hahahaha.. aww.. Nobody is asking Pakistan. lol. Bisti. Nobody gives a sh1t if Pakistan accepts or does not accept. Pakistan's stances don't work even on their own Pakistanis, let alone internationally. hahaha. Zaroor moonh kholna tha aur bisti kerwani thi Nawaz ne.
 

lurker

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
i m just sick off endians pigs on this forum. where the f uck all the admins are?
Yaar Asal mein kasoor admin ka nahi, na hi indians ka.. Some of our own Pakistanis plate mein rakh kar hamari bisti kerwatay hain indians se.. because they lack basic sense of how to make a hard hitting point. Instead woh soft target bana dete hain Pakistan ko.
 

Rashna

Banned
hahahaha. I've heard of the "beast", yeh bisti kya hota hai?

Yaar Asal mein kasoor admin ka nahi, na hi indians ka.. Some of our own Pakistanis plate mein rakh kar hamari bisti kerwatay hain indians se.. because they lack basic sense of how to make a hard hitting point. Instead woh soft target bana dete hain Pakistan ko.
 

drkjke

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
pakistan and india are one under zionists umbrella.the differences are just to deceive the masses and to keep high army budget so establishment can live life of luxury even greater than qaaroon and hamaan could afford!
yesterday sim bajwa gave statement that india is against pakistan and supporting taliban etc etc.if ispr was seriously against india than it had been doing operatio against india and indian agents.but you see operation zerb e qabaz against tribal people but army men are distributing sweets with hindus soldiers on indian border.
but alas pakistani nation too thick to realise what is in front of their eyes!
kashmir issue and nuclear issues have already been buried in grave in musharaf era.at present india pakistan are one under american zionist umbrella.whatever tension is it is to deceive the masses.
pak india war is only possible if pakistan becomes islamic and a ruler comes here who takes decisions independent of pakistans present zionist masters..untill than its all deception
 

modern.fakir

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
kiya hogaya luker bhai ?? :biggthumpup:...Tabiyat theek hai apki ??

Ofcourse Pakistans say matters as things are not that simple. (bigsmile)

Let me educate you to see how well you laugh after that !

You see NOT only India but Japan, Germany and Brazil also want to be Permanent members of the security council. now while the US backs India and Japan, China will never let Japan in. Likewise France doesnt want Germany In and neither does Russia now after the whole crimea affair [hilar][hilar]

Plus if the big 5 ever get through all these issues to include these 3 members they would have to re-draft the charter of the UN and FOR THAT you need the support of ALL the council members, yes thats right and that includes Pakistan :biggthumpup:

Now, lets say even that happens the biggest hurdle will be getting Past several countries that DONT WANT to support more members and have started theyre own group called "United for Consensus" or UFC and that group includes, Pakistan, indonesia, turkey, Italy, spain, some african countries, some south american countries as as some Arab Ones :biggthumpup:

Pakistan is the LEADER and FOUNDING member of the UFC which is the largest block along with the african union waiting for the reforms to happen. :biggthumpup:

China has not supported India what it has rather said is that it supports INdia and other countries quests for a "larger role" BUT categorically said that they support "reforms first" :biggthumpup:...the poor old indian media lacks accolades from china so every little word they can twist is a bonus for them.

Fortunately the military has briefed nawaz well ever since he surrendered to them due to the dharnas. He has done the job well to Obama which is why he is having the last laugh [hilar][hilar][hilar]

hahahaha.. aww.. Nobody is asking Pakistan. lol. Bisti. Nobody gives a sh1t if Pakistan accepts or does not accept. Pakistan's stances don't work even on their own Pakistanis, let alone internationally. hahaha. Zaroor moonh kholna tha aur bisti kerwani thi Nawaz ne.
 

modern.fakir

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Lurker bhai ...yeh wikipedia excerpt hai - Khass tor pay apki soft target "Bisti" kay liay ...perhiyay aur lutf uthaiyay [hilar][hilar][hilar]

History[edit]

Italy, through the ambassador Francesco Paolo Fulci, along with Pakistan, Mexico and Egypt, in 1995 founded the "Coffee Club".[SUP][3][/SUP] The four countries were united by a rejection of the increase of the permanent members of the Security Council and the desire to encourage rather the expansion of non-permanent seats. The founders of the group were soon joined by other countries, including Spain, Argentina, Turkey, Canada, and South Korea, and in a short time the group came to include about 50 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.[SUP][3][/SUP]The thesis of the Uniting for Consensus group is that the increase of permanent seats would have further accentuated the disparity between the member countries and resulted in the extension of a series of privileges with a cascade effect. The new permanent members would have in fact benefited from the method of electing particularly advantageous in a number of specific organs of the United Nations System.



hahahaha.. aww.. Nobody is asking Pakistan. lol. Bisti. Nobody gives a sh1t if Pakistan accepts or does not accept. Pakistan's stances don't work even on their own Pakistanis, let alone internationally. hahaha. Zaroor moonh kholna tha aur bisti kerwani thi Nawaz ne.
 

modern.fakir

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Now remember what Nawaz said to Obama " Pakistani does not support India's Bid for UNSC " that means all those UFC countries about 50 of them dont support it either [hilar][hilar][hilar]

kuch samajh mein ayee ya phir "Hajj in a temple" kerwaoon ??[hilar][hilar][hilar]


hahahaha.. aww.. Nobody is asking Pakistan. lol. Bisti. Nobody gives a sh1t if Pakistan accepts or does not accept. Pakistan's stances don't work even on their own Pakistanis, let alone internationally. hahaha. Zaroor moonh kholna tha aur bisti kerwani thi Nawaz ne.
 

lurker

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
kiya hogaya luker bhai ?? :biggthumpup:...Tabiyat theek hai apki ??

Ofcourse Pakistans say matters as things are not that simple. (bigsmile)

Let me educate you to see how well you laugh after that !

You see NOT only India but Japan, Germany and Brazil also want to be Permanent members of the security council. now while the US backs India and Japan, China will never let Japan in. Likewise France doesnt want Germany In and neither does Russia now after the whole crimea affair [hilar][hilar]

Plus if the big 5 ever get through all these issues to include these 3 members they would have to re-draft the charter of the UN and FOR THAT you need the support of ALL the council members, yes thats right and that includes Pakistan :biggthumpup:

Now, lets say even that happens the biggest hurdle will be getting Past several countries that DONT WANT to support more members and have started theyre own group called "United for Consensus" or UFC and that group includes, Pakistan, indonesia, turkey, Italy, spain, some african countries, some south american countries as as some Arab Ones :biggthumpup:

Pakistan is the LEADER and FOUNDING member of the UFC which is the largest block along with the african union waiting for the reforms to happen. :biggthumpup:

China has not supported India what it has rather said is that it supports INdia and other countries quests for a "larger role" BUT categorically said that they support "reforms first" :biggthumpup:...the poor old indian media lacks accolades from china so every little word they can twist is a bonus for them.

Fortunately the military has briefed nawaz well ever since he surrendered to them due to the dharnas. He has done the job well to Obama which is why he is having the last laugh [hilar][hilar][hilar]

Power. This is what Pakistan lacks. The Coffee Club is filled with players who are significantly less powerful than India's camp.

India has everyone on it's side from the Big 5 except China. And the way India is moving ahead, getting China onboard will not be out of the realms of possibility. India does not need the Coffee Club members, it has the major backing of 4 Permanent member Security Council Nations. And more over China has proposed to India that if India revokes its support for Japan's candidacy, China will back India. This means India is in the Unique position of having support of ALL the Big 5 nations under it's belt. The Coffee Club can enjoy it's little fireworks while India has the big guns. In such a situation you want to come out here and talk about little Pakistan's refusal? Like a little child whose candy has been stolen. lol.

Therefore the "Bisti" you have unintentionally brought to Pakistan is fully your property to own. :)
 

betterpakistan

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
TALKIN BOUT NUKES ND ALL..HEHE..JUST SEE SOME US CYBER AGENCY IS NOT SNOOPING ON YOU FOR TERROR ALERT....AFTER ALL HOW MANY PAKISTANIS GET DEPORTED EVERY YEAR IS AN OPEN SECRET....

LOL very funny dude, how old are you kids ? Each and every comments you made is so childish. You should be studying hard rather spending your item on net and this forum. Jahoo beta abu ko lahooo, hum bucho say nai larthay
 

modern.fakir

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Here you go lurker another royal slap on the face of your understanding or shall i say "Bisti" in a temple [hilar][hilar]...check this recent article on China's stance ...

Besides discussing bilateral and regional matters, the two sides also held talks on the United Nations Security Council.

"Both sides agreed on the need to make United Nations Security Council more representative and effective, and that its reform should be achieved by consensus," it said.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ia-strategic-balance/articleshow/46246396.cms

Power. This is what Pakistan lacks. The Coffee Club is filled with players who are significantly less powerful than India's camp.

India has everyone on it's side from the Big 5 except China. And the way India is moving ahead, getting China onboard will not be out of the realms of possibility. India does not need the Coffee Club members, it has the major backing of 4 Permanent member Security Council Nations. And more over China has proposed to India that if India revokes its support for Japan's candidacy, China will back India. This means India is in the Unique position of having support of ALL the Big 5 nations under it's belt. The Coffee Club can enjoy it's little fireworks while India has the big guns. In such a situation you want to come out here and talk about little Pakistan's refusal? Like a little child whose candy has been stolen. lol.

Therefore the "Bisti" you have unintentionally brought to Pakistan is fully your property to own. :)
 

lurker

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Where's the "Bisit" part in this article? lol.

Here you go lurker another royal slap on the face of your understanding or shall i say "Bisti" in a temple [hilar][hilar]...check this recent article on China's stance ...

Besides discussing bilateral and regional matters, the two sides also held talks on the United Nations Security Council.

"Both sides agreed on the need to make United Nations Security Council more representative and effective, and that its reform should be achieved by consensus," it said.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ia-strategic-balance/articleshow/46246396.cms
 

Back
Top