Pakistan ki Aan Imran Khan .

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

[h=3]The Leader
[/h] Khan the leader who has proved his leadership capabilities in the field of cricket, when Pakistan won first and only World cup, in the year 1992. After getting retirement from cricket he laid the foundation of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre in Lahore. The largest Cancer hospital in Pakistan.
Aftrer proving his leadership in cricket field, Khan decided to laid the foundation of a political party named as Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (Movement for Justice). His main aim of making this foundation was to bring justice in the lives of Pakistani people through an independent judiciary. His vision is that only free and independent judiciary can bring peace and
[h=3]Life of Imran Khan[/h] Imran Khan Niazi, born in Lahore, on 25 November 1952, in the family of Ikramullah Khan Niazi, and his wife Shaukat Khanum, as the only son of his parents. The family belonged to the tribe of Niazi Shermankhel. He get his early education at the Cathedral School in Lahore, the Royal Grammar School Worcester in England, where he excelled at cricket, and later at Aitchison College, Lahore. In 1972, he enrolled to study Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Keble College, Oxford, where he graduated with a second-class degree in Politics and a third in Economics. He was the former cricketer of Pakistani cricket team and played for two decades and even he led his teammates to the first and only Cricket World Cup in the year 1992. Before getting retirement from cricket he started his political career and laid founded the political party Pakistan Tahreek-Insaaf (PTI) and became his chairman.
He also established a charity Hospital, bearing the name of his mother, named Shaukat Khanam Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center in 1996. For this purpose he started a campaign of fund raising all over the world and after such a hard work he was able to laid the foundation of this hospital. He gathered over 25 million donations and funds.
On 16 May 1996, he was married to jemima Marcelle Goldsmith, but the marriage of Imran khan could not run long and he divorced Jemima in 2004, because it was difficult for jemema to adapt the life style of Pakistan and Imran Khan could not give time to her from his tough schedule.
[h=3]Personal details:[/h] [h=3]Born[/h] 25 November 1952 (age 59)
Lahore, Pakistan
[h=3]Political party[/h] Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
[h=3]Spouse(s)[/h] Jemima Khan (19952004)
[h=3]Children[/h] Sulaiman
Qasim Khan
[h=3]Residence[/h] Lahore
[h=3]Alma mater[/h] Keble College, Oxford
[h=3]Occupation[/h] Politician
Philanthropist
Cricketer
[h=3]Religion[/h] Islam


​

 

[Zafar Malik]

[h=3]Awards & Honors of Imran Khan
[/h]
Imran Khan has achieved many awards and honors in his life career. A complete list of Imran khan’s achievements is described below:

• 
  [*=center]In 1992 he was bestowed with the civil award of Hilal-i-Imtiaz.
  [*=center]In 1983, he get the pride of performance award.
  [*=center]In 2011 Imran Khan was honored with the Jinnah award.
  [*=center]He is also featured as Hall of fame at the University of Oxford.
  [*=center]Being a leading allrounder in the English cricket world he was awarded in 1976 and 1980 with The Cricket Society Wetherall Award.
  [*=center]At the university of Bredford, in 2005, he was elected as the fifth chancellor of the university.
  [*=center]He was also named as Wisden cricketer of the year,in 1983.
  [*=center]In 1985, he was awarded as the player of the year by Sussex Cricket Society.
  [*=center]He was also presented special silver jubilee awards at the inaugural Asian cricket Council (ACC) award ceremony in Karachi, in 2008.
  [*=center]As a head for many international charities and working passionately and enthusiastically in fund-raising activities and was awarded Life Time Achievement Award at the 2004 Jewel Awards in London.
  [*=center]For establishing a first Cancer Hospital in Pakistan he was awarded the Humanitarian Award at the Asian Sports Awards in Kuala Lumpur.

​

 

[Zafar Malik]

​

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

[h=1]Colorful Imran Khan[/h] By unique07 on January 17, 2013 | From latestworldbusinessnews.blogspot.com

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]Imran Khan with his sons Sulaiman Isa and Kasim[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Imran Khan is the world famous cricketer and now also politician born on 25 November 1952 in Pakistan. He played international cricket for two decades in the late twentieth century and, after retiring, entered politics. Besides, his political activism, Khan is also a philanthropist, cricket commentator, Chancellor of the University of Bradford and Founding Chairman Board of Governors of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre.

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]Imran Khan batting[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
He was Pakistan's most successful cricket captain, leading his country to victory at the 1992 Cricket World Cup, playing for the Pakistani cricket team from 1971 to 1992, and serving as its captain intermittently throughout 1982–1992.

After retiring from cricket at the end of the 1987 World Cup in 1988, due to popular public demand he was requested to come back by the president of Pakistan to lead the team once again. At 39, Khan led his team to Pakistan's first and only World Cup victory in 1992.


He has a record of 3807 runs and 362 wickets in Test cricket, making him one of eight world cricketers to have achieved an 'All-rounder's Triple' in Test matches. On 14 July 2010, Khan was inducted into the ICC Cricket Hall of Fame.

In April 1996, Khan founded and became the chairman of a political party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (Movement for Justice). He represented Mianwali as a member of the National Assembly from November 2002 to October 2007. Foreign Policy magazine described him as "Pakistan's Ron Paul".

[TABLE="class: tr-caption-container"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: tr-caption"]Imran Khan's former wife Jemima Khan[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

On 16 May 1995, Khan married Jemima Goldsmith, in an Islamic ceremony in Paris. A month later, on 21 June, they were married again in a civil ceremony at the Richmond register office in England, followed by a reception at the Goldsmiths' house in Surrey. The marriage, described as "tough" by Khan, produced two sons, Sulaiman Isa (born 18 November 1996) and Kasim (born 10 April 1999). As an agreement of his marriage, Khan spent four months a year in England. On 22 June 2004, it was announced that the Khans had divorced because it was "difficult for Jemima to adapt to life in Pakistan". The marriage ended amicably. Imran has regular access to his children and his relationship with his ex-wife is friendly.
Khan now resides alone in Bani Gala, Islamabad, a 300 kanal (37 acre) house plus farmhouse which he built with the money he initially borrowed from his wife and re-paid after selling his London flat. He grows fruit trees, wheat, and keeps cows and dogs, while also maintaining a cricket ground for his two sons, who visit during their holidays. Khan is known as one of the few cricket players who has a clean record of match fixing and the trust that he has maintained for so long has helped his political life quiet well.

We expect Imran Khan will play more role for emancipation of the peoples of Pakistan, for a freeness from the hardship to normal social, political, cultural, democratic and development era. Good Luck Imran Khan. Live long Imran Khan.
​

 

[Zafar Malik]

Photograph by Adrian Murrell/Getty Images

Imran Khan, captain of the Pakistan cricket team, lifts the Cricket World Cup, in Melbourne, on March 25, 1992



​

 

[Zafar Malik]

[h=2]Of Imran Khan, Double Standards & Trolls; An article By Shah Zalmay Khan[/h]

1. 
   justhuman
   
   
   
   
   Imran Khan, perhaps, is the only leader in todays Pakistan who, even though not in power, is discussed almost everywhere, in political, social and media circles. His followers regard him as an icon of change while his detractors find fault in everything he says or does or intends to do or is even perceived to have intended (refer TuQ dharna :D). The detractors, called IK-bashers by Khans followers, include political opponents, media and intelligentsia.
   .
   Keeping aside criticism by political opponents, most bashing (yes bashing) that Imran Khan receives from media and intellectuals (whatever that term means) has a very strong shade of double standard, to be polite (hypocrisy, to be harsh). How? Let me quote from TV anchor Moeed Pirzadas Facebook status update on his page few days ago:
   
   Do you sometimes feel that not only the politicians - who can be excused for being rivals- but even the key commentators in media keep on portraying Imran Khan and PTI very unfairly; as if there is one standard to judge intelligence, ability and wisdom of all Pakistani politicians and another 'higher' or 'western' standard to judge Imran Khan and PTI? for instance when Imran Khan is referred to as "inconsistent" or "flip-flop" then who in Pakistan is he being compared to? and so on on many similar issues.....
   
   Moeed Pirzada says it all about the thinking pattern involuntary or vested - of media and intellectuals when it comes to Imran Khan. It is for this reason that we find Imran Khan and PTI being scrutinized even for such minor issues as mismanagement in PTI aftari. Even though Imran Khan has never ruled the land of the pure (so has technically no responsibility or part in the mess Pakistan finds itself in today), he is the leader scrutinized (rather bashed) mostly over all issues; be it terrorism, economy, energy or foreign relations etc.
   
   .
   .
   It is not uncommon for intellectuals to single out IK for bashing over some particular issue. For example, Mr Feisal Naqvi wrote Shame on you, Mr Khan just because he thought IK failed to condemn the attack on Malala Yousafzai, even though IK was the 1st political leader to visit Malala at CMH Peshawar a day after the incident. He condemned the terrorists and offered to bear all expenses of her treatment. Compared to IK no other mainstream political leader visited her, even then Mr Naqvi had only IK to bash and not Nawaz Sharif or Maulana Fazl or Zardari (all rulers). Different standards to gauge?
   .
   Take the example of Imran Khans stance on terrorism. Learned Zahrah Nasir called IK Thoughtless Khan over his anti-WOT views while Mr Saleem Safi and Mr Saroop Ijaz vehemently objected to his Waziristan March, the latter calling it cowardly politics. None of the learned intellectuals however, question Nawaz Sharif or Zardari (the rulers responsible for controlling the mess) as to what is their plan, if any, to end the bloodshed? Different gauges?
   .
   Many intellectuals love to call IK Taliban Khan for having proposed to hold talks for resolving the militancy problem, in FATA as well as Balochistan. However, when the same demand has been copied & relayed by Nawaz Sharif now, the silence of intellectuals is deafening. No names like Taliban Sharif etc. Why? Different standards to gauge?
   .
   A related issue is the killings of innocent Shias in Quetta, GB and elsewhere. Imran Khan was the only political leader who went to express solidarity with Hazara Shia victims of Quetta twice (April 2012 and January 2013) and GB Shia victims (September 2012). He has unequivocally condemned LeJ for the killings and demanded action against them. Even then liberals and intellectuals bash Imran Khan for not doing enough on this front (when he has nothing in hand actually). On the flip-side, PMLN has made electoral alliance with ASWJ (front of LeJ) but no intellectual or media anchor has seriously quizzed them over this fact. Why? Different gauges?
   .
   Coming to policies; take Dr Pervez Hoodbhoys example who believes Imran Khan cant save Pakistan because he thinks PTIs stance is sheer rhetoric and it has no concrete policy (incidentally Mr Hoodbhoy considers PMLN as the answer to Pakistans economic problems :D). While writing this, the learned professor conveniently ignores the fact that PTI is the only (safely only) party to have presented comprehensive policies on all burning issues facing Pakistan; from Energy to Rural Governance to Economy to Health to Youth Empowerment to Curbing Corruption. Again bashing IK without even questioning Nawaz or Zardari. Different gauges?
   .
   Take the example of PTIs intra-party elections. Questions were raised by media and intellectuals about transparency of the membership campaign, errors in voter lists, delays in election schedule, grouping & lobbying in UC-level elections, rifts and infighting among workers. While pointing out flaws in PTIs election process, detractors conveniently forget to acknowledge that it is the only party to take up such a huge task of multi-tier party elections down to UC level. (The election of lower middle class people is proof of transparency). The debate doesnt take the focus that it should i.e. asking Nawaz Sharif and Zardari and others to follow suit and go for true party elections in their parties. Different standards to gauge?
   .
   Thats not all. Come to asset declaration: PTI's leadership declared their assets in August 2012 and the same were posted on the party's website for public access. This was a huge step towards a corruption-free and financially transparent party - a phenomoneon not known to Pakistan. However, since the initiative was taken by PTI, it was taken for granted and the media & intellectuals failed to do the needful i.e. press PMLN, PPP and others to do the same. This step alone would have exposed the faces of the corrupt ruling Pakistan. It has been 6 months since August and one has yet to see the media or intellectuals raise this issue properly. Why? Different yardsticks?
   .
   Another example may merit a mention. All hell broke loose when some electables from other parties joined PTI and everybody said Gen Pasha was behind it. However, when dozens of Q-leaguer electables joined PMLN, nobody said it was Gen Zaheer-ul-Islam pulling their strings. Different standards?
   .
   Similarly when TuQ (Dr Tahir Ul Qadri) landed on the political horizon in Dec 12, MQM sided with it and then flip-flopped a dozen times over joining or not joining TuQs 14-January dharna. PTI didnt even join TuQ but the whole media scene was rife with conspiracy theories predicting that Imran Khan would join him & thus derail democracy. Nobody apologized when that didnt happen and nobody has quizzed MQM since that day as to the reason of their flip-flops on Qadri? Why? Different standards?
   .
   And who has missed the latest. PTI leaders meeting TuQ was sensationalized with breaking headlines even though the same PTI leaders held similar meetings with leadership of all parties outside the parliament like JI and MWM. Intellectuals like Mr Kamran Shafi called it nefarious plan of Imran Khan. However, when Nawaz Sharif sat together the other day with Maulana Fazl (3 years PPP-ally), everybody praised his political acumen. Why is PTI meeting TuQ bad but PMLN meeting JUI perfectly cool? Different standards to gauge?
   .
   While some of this double-standard opinion-making may be condoned as error-of-judgement on part of the media or intellectuals, there are some instances where the opinions take the form of senseless rant, mainly due to the hate (yes hate) that some so-called intellectuals and media folks have for Imran Khan (call it Lifaafa or whatever). The latest gems in this series came from Mr Kamran Shafi, the intellectual with some personal vendetta, may be. Imran Khan expressed his views about Asma Jehangir's candidature for caretaker PM politely and so did Asma Jehangir but what justifies these disgusting remarks by a supposedly learned intellectual like Mr Shafi (calling IK an 'idiot', 'fool' and 'idiot of the highest order')?
   
   .
   When some random PTI supporter on Twitter or Facebook confronts such media folks and intellectuals (some spell the word as Intellect-Chawal) over this double standard, they are outrightly dubbed abusers or trolls. No Sires, they are not trolls. May be their choice of words for complaint needs refinement but their substance is well-founded; the bias & double-standard is all too obvious.
   In the end, I would like to quote Abraham Lincoln:
   
   You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
   
   This is history's lesson my dear intellectuals & media & IKs political opponents.
   .
   .
   The writer is a tribesman from Bajaur Agency (FATA)
   
   
   Posted 3 days ago on 20 Feb 2013 6:11 #
   
   
   

 

[S.A.Z]

تصاویر بہت عمدہ بنائی ہیں جناب

آپ کے کمال فن کو داد دیتا ہوں۔


اللہ کرے زور ہنر اور زیادہ۔


​

 

[Zafar Malik]

تصاویر بہت عمدہ بنائی ہیں جناب

آپ کے کمال فن کو داد دیتا ہوں۔


اللہ کرے زور ہنر اور زیادہ۔


​

apka shukriya . mein ne nahein bani tasweerein . aap internet se le sakte hein ..........mujhe pasand aaein aur applogon se share kar rah hoon appko pasand aein jiss ki khushi hoi shukrita

 

[Zafar Malik]

​

 

[Zafar Malik]

​

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

 

[Zafar Malik]

​

 

[Zafar Malik]