Najam Sethi calls Quad e Azam an 'Ahmaq' & Dr Niazi's angry response(column)

[Mughal1]

Quade Azam kisi ke kehene se kaafir ya ahmaq nahin ho jaata us ne jo kar ke dikhaaya sab ke saamne hai.

Woh islam ka mujahid tha jis ne sahee islam ko samjha aur insaanu ko un baatun se agah kiya jo aaj sab ko darpesh hen. Yahee bade zehn ke logoon ki nishaani hoti hai.

najam sethi ho ya koi aur jin logoon ko islam ka ilm hi is qadar kam ho keh ghair muslimun se bhi gaye guzre maloom paden un se ham aur kia tawaqqo rakh sakte hen.


HAM KO UN SE HAI WAFAA KI UMEED

JO NAHIN JAANTE WAFAA KIA HAI


Jo koi bhi islam aur insaaniyat ka dushman ho woh pakistan aur is ke banaane walun ka dost kese ho sakta hai?

 

[thedude]

Re: Najam Sethi Ki Be Izzati by Ajmal Niazia (in a Column)

Now , FOR THEDUDE ,

By the Way , This Infidel , me myself have spent previous 6 years analysing and studying Jinnah , Kindly name FEW OF HIS BAD ACTIONS , Aur Please Bengali abolishment and constitution ka name na laena , He had his plans , which he was not able to complete , aur US KAE BAAD ANAE WALAE MIRASAE CHURAE THEA , except Khawaja Nazim Ud din and Zia (He fought a war , and I consider him a good man )

Why do I have to name any of his bad actions? It was Najam Sethi, not I, who called one of his actions as himaaqat!

I don't even know what action NS was referring to ... all I'm saying is that if NS thinks that some of his actions was himaaqat, not only he has a right to say that, it is not insulting to Jinnah, nor does it mean NS is calling Jinnah "ahmaq" ... you might not agree that that action is a himaaqat but that is a completely different matter

Anyway

following is the official reply from NS himself (starting from 4 min 35 sec), judge for yourself:

(P.S.: just to be clear, just cz i've posted this video here doesn't mean I agree with whatever he says)

 

[ISIKHAN]

Bhaio. Kaam sa kaaaam ise baat k soucho keh use time bhare bhare molvi or secular leader tha lekrn Allama iqbal na quaid e azam k intikhab kiya kiu keh use k pata tha tu kaam sa kaaam apna leader k ihtiraaam kare :)

 

[cefspan]

Re: Najam Sethi Ki Be Izzati by Ajmal Niazia (in a Column)

Why do I have to name any of his bad actions? It was Najam Sethi, not I, who called one of his actions as himaaqat!

I don't even know what action NS was referring to ... all I'm saying is that if NS thinks that some of his actions was himaaqat, not only he has a right to say that, it is not insulting to Jinnah, nor does it mean NS is calling Jinnah "ahmaq" ... you might not agree that that action is a himaaqat but that is a completely different matter

Anyway

following is the official reply from NS himself (starting from 4 min 35 sec), judge for yourself:

(P.S.: just to be clear, just cz i've posted this video here doesn't mean I agree with whatever he says)

Sorry for mis-understanding , and Thank You. :)

 

[youngnights]

Najam Sethi has replied to twit saying

@SadatHasanManto I did NOT call him "ahmak"! I said the stupid decision to impose Urdu on Bengalis later became basis of their separatism.

​

 

[thedude]

Najam Sethi has replied to twit saying

@SadatHasanManto I did NOT call him "ahmak"! I said the stupid decision to impose Urdu on Bengalis later became basis of their separatism.

​

lol ... now I stand corrected ... apparently, by himaaqat he did mean stupidity (contrary to what I was thinking)

 

[atensari]

 

[k.a.kiani]

Re: Najam Sethi Ki Be Izzati by Ajmal Niazia (in a Column)

Najam Sethi has a point of view and he has every right to the freedom of speech. Let's not be cyber Mumtaz Qadris, Qaid Azam was a great man and founder of our nation but he is not a Prophet (nauzibillah). Religious parties like JI, JUI used to call him Kafir Azam.

PTI members should not used foul language against any journalist but rather convince them through logic and reason, calling them names and cursing widens the ever increasing polarity in our society and completely counter productive.

I think brother you didn't get enough clue about Najam sethi's character in Niazi's column. Anyway to know somebody's agenda, is not very difficult. you just have to listen what he/she is saying and also what he/she is not saying. I am sure you will get to his/her agenda. I think whatever Niazi said in the column, most of us are already convinced.

You can say this against Quid e Azam by sitting in Canada because you don't know what freedom is and how it feels when you don't have it. He was not prophet but he was our Mohsin and using this kind of language about our Mohsin gives us utter right to condemn him in the same way.

you are such hypocrite, on one side you are saying that he is founder of Pakistan and great man and on the same time you are allowing other person to call him "ahmaq". Your father must be very respectful person for you. would you give me right to call him "ahmaq". He is father of our nation so this can't be tolerated. I hope my logic will make you satisfied if you have courtesy