Today's "breaking news" story is about a leaked converstation between IK & Dr. Arif Alvi - which is undoubtedly multiple phone calls stitched together to portray a narrative / propaganda
What is more important is to publicly identify the propagandists involved in recording a private call -- espionage by whom? is it even legal? is it invasion of privacy? but then going on to stitch / splice together multiple calls to suit a propaganda / narrative is that even conceivably ligit?
FACTS: It seems two / three conversations were stitched together to suit a propaganda. the discussion about the attack on PTV - was "NEWS" to IK, he even reacted as such (proves he was not behind it), even called it then as a pressure tactic. Which it was, but what Dr Arif says has been doctored / deleted is the later part of the call where he tells IK - that PTI has NO INVOLVEMENT with this attack on PTV and he must publicly denounce it, else the propagandists masquerading this attack will put the blame on PTI, and IK then went on top of the container immediately to denounce the attack on PTV (media evidence)
The other discussion about MQM (recorded a few days before/after) - it is on public record that PTI asked support from all parties for the Azadi Dharna - MQM did pledge some support and a press release was prepared in advance. -- Dr Arif will share all his views on this audio conversation on FB soon
What one must seriously take into context is that a sitting MNA of MQMSyed Ali Raza Abidi was the one who acquired this private conversation - doctored it, and then goes on to publicly release & continues to fully support this illegal act. Quite honestly we have to add phone espionage to the MQM arsenal of blackmailing of their opponents. So much for Abidi's own stake in the IT industry viz-a-viz issues related to PRIVACY or his involvement / support of ESPIONAGE
Source
Last edited by a moderator: