Not everyone who opposes Qadiani is either a "Mullah" (a term used by Qadianis for their own motives) or a religious fanatic as you claimed. There are many like me who have based their opinions not on bias but on the basis of reading their material and research.
Therefore your claim that we should oppose then answer them on the basis of reasons. For your information that's what I have done for 4/5 years. You cannot accuse me of lack of tolerance. But my experience tell me that they are worst of the worst. Forget about academic discussion or research with them, they have their own concoctions and everything they do is to prove those lies, deceptions and concoctions. They are completely averse to any feed back, any reflection to what the truth may be.
For example, instead of using the similar quotes used frequently that Mirza did this Mirza did that, I decided to pick few topics and researched it myself, rather than swayed by what material is already available.
I checked the so-called revelations of Mirza to see if he was a genuine guy. What I find is that he was a grand liar. I wrote 3 articles based on his claims that he received revelations for his brother's and father's deaths from God in advance. In both cases I found conclusive evidence;
A- He didn't received any revelations whatsoever. Instead he concocted the lies years and years after their death.
B) Due to the passage of time he forgot when his father and brother died. Therefore he used varied years for both deaths, in the same book, few pages apart. My articles are there published, I have challenged Qadianis to take me to the courts and I will prove it under the accepted rules of evidence that Mirza was a grand liar.
No Qadiani has ever had the courage.
One of their biggest claim is that "Khatam" doesn't mean last but many things. Therefore, the prophethood has not come to an end after Prophet SAW. I research it and produced evidence from Mirza's own books from his alleged revelations. Mirza said God revealed to him "Ponder Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani is "Khatam RabulAlameen". For over two years I am asking Qadianis what "Khatam RabulAlameen" means according to their own meanings of the phrase "Khatam-un-Nabeen". But Qadianis keep running instead of answering my questions.
Why wouldn't they answer if their arguments are based on truth? What kind of liar was Mirza?
I tell you what kind of Liar was Mirza. He realised that Prophet Muhammad SAW has great honour given to him by Allah SWT as "Khatam-un-Nabeen". He tried to over come this problem all his life, to breach the barrier so he could be accepted as a new prophet by Muslims (nauzobillah). But he couldn't crack it. He decided to invent a title for himself. He thought there could be only one thing greater than Prophets, Allah SWT.
So he bestowed himself the title "Khatam RabulAlameen" (nauzobillah).
What you want me to call him?
And what would you say to those Qadiani who cannot answer reasonable questions based on the undeniable evidence from Mirza's own books?
I live in the UK, not far from Qadianis headquarters. Lots of them know me and my writings, my challenge is open to them to take me to the courts. But they never would, the day they decide, I would destroy Qadianiat forever.
Instead of using your stupid comments, keep out.