Is India a Democracy? (2)
[FONT=&]Is India a Democracy?[/FONT][hilar]
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
-------------
Is India a Democracy? 2
-------------
(It seems Indian intelligence/Interpol teams that follow all my drafts in the email have removed this draft from my Gmail draft as I was updating it. They know all about my typing or drafting or publishing. Many of my drafts and mails have been removed by them in the past as well.)
Is it not shame India? Most of the ideas are lost now because India unfortunately finds my writings a serious threat even if less dangerous than Anna Hazare who is spearheading what is now known as Second Freedom Struggle to cleanse Indian regime of corrupt elements and change the regime with new anti-corruption leaders. .
Let me reconstruct the article considered to be threatening to regime's illegal interests, now:
__________________________________________________ _
Washington considers only anti-Islamic or non-Islamic, anti-communist/socialist or non-communist/socialist nations as "democracies" because they promote rampant corruption and US imperialist tendencies. Any power small or big that opposes US corrupt and imperialist policies is automatically termed as dictatorship. Iraq became dictatorship when Saddam Hussein opposed US unilateralism and now Iraq and Libya are also dictatorships because they refuse to buy US gimmicks.
All nations that support whatever USA and Israel do - or do not - are treated by CIA as legitimate democracies and they enjoy full impunity for their crimes.
All pro-US Arab nations like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar and Kuwait are thus automatically bracketed as "democracies, chiefly because they promote crony capitalism in the name of Islam. These nations shamelessly make generous contributions to NATO fascist operations in Afghanistan,, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere where Muslims are slaughtered like cattle.
Like wise, India is also called a democracy by USA, the leader of NATO terror syndicate because India also funds US terrorism in Islamic world. India is liked by USA and its European allies because of generous investments in these countries and their support for Obama terrorism through high precision drones. India also murders Muslims in and around, especially in occupied Jammu Kashmir. Joint terror operations and intelligence sharing have made India a favorite place for all top state terrorists of the top terrocracies.
In India prices have been shooting up not only in real estate and god rates but also in essential commodities that affected common people who have now come to the streets to protest against protection of corrupt leaders by the Manmohan regime.
Obviously, it looks funny to pose such stupid question if India is a democracy when everyone knows India is a fake democracy where national and international frauds control its economy and finances, promotes state corruption as well as state crimes to support rampant corruption as a package deal. Promotion of corporate sector by squeezing public sector resources, creating a b large contingents of parasitic capitalists who take away the lions share of development of the nation including the part that belongs to the less privileged people and Muslims, promotion of rampant corruption, black money proliferation at home and money laundering promotion abroad are the key functions of Manmohan regime which assumed office because some communal forces led by BJP refused to accept an Italy born Sonia Gandhi and the Congress party chief becoming Indian premier. A foreign premier is opposed by mother India which aims at Hindus to be top leaders abroad, like in Malaysia.
Manmohan Singh, a former top bank bureaucrat who heading the Reserve bank with WB/IMF connections and obliging the Indian leaders and big business men is not elected by people directly and as such his commitment o to them cannot be expected to be firm. He is instrumental in creating the highly corrupt officials, politicians and businessmen and he began his operation to reach the top slot when he was made the deputy chief of planning commission under the then tricky premier Narosimha-rao who tactfully helped the right wing Hindu terrorists to pull down the Grand Babri Mosque and also pledged to rebuilt the Mosque, but kept silent about this till his ultimate death.
Manmohan is committed only those who brought hm to power.
Since he is the prime cause of rampant corruption in India which mother India dutifully tolerates Manmohan Singh cannot b expected to do away with it.
There is the strong opinion that India did not get freedom in 1947 but only the big industrialists, business class and rural kulaks (zamindars) that wanted to rule the nation through a puppet cabinet alone and obtained freedom to get rid of Britishers.
Since 1947, thus, the Nehru regime promoted nepotism and rampant corruption is small measure. He began employing special powers to promote corporate corruption and that led to the official corruption as well. When Manmohan took over the reign it was easy for him to promote corruption as a state policy.
Indian constitution has abundance of laws and clauses to stump corruption at the root. But the trend has only grown further in an alarming manner. All ruling and opposition parties have generously contributed t o make India one of top corruption nations of the globe.
In promoting rampant corruption in the nation by using the covers like terrorism, Pakistan and Islamic fundamentalism, etc, Indian parliament has, for decades now, disrespected the people who offered their deputies the necessary mandate in a democratic manner. The MPs by promoting their own private interests have insulted the parliament as the prime agency for democracy.
The well fed parliamentarians have no reason to feel the pain of an old man called Anna Hazare suffering without food for days now, fasting for completely arresting the trend of corruption in the country.
Can a regime change bring about a fundamental change in corruption standards? Given the nature of politics and political parties and politicians, no one believes that change in leadership or government itself indeed would result in better corruption free governance. India has had so many regimes in varying colors and new programs since 1947 but the process of corruption went hand in hand with parliamentary democratic process. MPs cannot exist without taking bribes for their services to people.
.>
-------------------------
It is ridiculous to expat Manmohan Singh, basically a bank employee releasing funds to ruling circles and their allies and without any link to populations and has not been elected by the people but nominated by the Congress party to Parliament cannot shield the ordinary populations. He has only learned whom to please and how to escape punishment. Manmohan shields all corrupt ministers, politicians and officials. One has no information about his assets. As such India cannot expect Manmohan to wind down corruption routes.
The Congress party , the major corruption agent in India has blamed the "troubles" in India by the new wave of protests to BJP, RSS and America. But Anna Hazare has rightly ridiculed the Congress regime for this funny remarks and said Congress party would, as the regime policy, blame Pakistan as well to save
its own skin .
As the Anna's popular movement became severe for the regime, India employed the usual terror gimmick operations in Occupied Kashmir, killing Muslims and a couple of post-paid state terrorists who get rewards even posthumously for the their sense of patriotism, while Kashmiri Muslims are called terrorists and are forgotten. Howeve4r, the ready-made conflict in Kashmir has not pacified the movement and leaders.
(To continue)
Is India a Democracy?
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
-------------
(It seems Indian intelligence/Interpol teams that follow all my drafts in the email have removed this draft from my Gmail draft as I was updating it. They know all about my typing or drafting or publishing. Many of my drafts and mails have been removed by them in the past as well.)
Is it not shame India? Most of the ideas are lost now because India unfortunately finds my writings a serious threat even if less dangerous than Anna Hazare who is spearheading what is now known as Second Freedom Struggle to cleanse Indian regime of corrupt elements and change the regime with new anti-corruption leaders. .
Let me reconstruct the article considered to be threatening to regime's illegal interests, now:
__________________________________________________ _
Washington considers only anti-Islamic or non-Islamic, anti-communist/socialist or non-communist/socialist nations as "democracies" because they promote rampant corruption and US imperialist tendencies. Any power small or big that opposes US corrupt and imperialist policies is automatically termed as dictatorship. Iraq became dictatorship when Saddam Hussein opposed US unilateralism and now Iraq and Libya are also dictatorships because they refuse to buy US gimmicks.
All nations that support whatever USA and Israel do - or do not - are treated by CIA as legitimate democracies and they enjoy full impunity for their crimes.
All pro-US Arab nations like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar and Kuwait are thus automatically bracketed as "democracies, chiefly because they promote crony capitalism in the name of Islam. These nations shamelessly make generous contributions to NATO fascist operations in Afghanistan,, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere where Muslims are slaughtered like cattle.
Like wise, India is also called a democracy by USA, the leader of NATO terror syndicate because India also funds US terrorism in Islamic world. India is liked by USA and its European allies because of generous investments in these countries and their support for Obama terrorism through high precision drones. India also murders Muslims in and around, especially in occupied Jammu Kashmir. Joint terror operations and intelligence sharing have made India a favorite place for all top state terrorists of the top terrocracies.
In India prices have been shooting up not only in real estate and god rates but also in essential commodities that affected common people who have now come to the streets to protest against protection of corrupt leaders by the Manmohan regime.
Obviously, it looks funny to pose such stupid question if India is a democracy when everyone knows India is a fake democracy where national and international frauds control its economy and finances, promotes state corruption as well as state crimes to support rampant corruption as a package deal. Promotion of corporate sector by squeezing public sector resources, creating a b large contingents of parasitic capitalists who take away the lions share of development of the nation including the part that belongs to the less privileged people and Muslims, promotion of rampant corruption, black money proliferation at home and money laundering promotion abroad are the key functions of Manmohan regime which assumed office because some communal forces led by BJP refused to accept an Italy born Sonia Gandhi and the Congress party chief becoming Indian premier. A foreign premier is opposed by mother India which aims at Hindus to be top leaders abroad, like in Malaysia.
Manmohan Singh, a former top bank bureaucrat who heading the Reserve bank with WB/IMF connections and obliging the Indian leaders and big business men is not elected by people directly and as such his commitment o to them cannot be expected to be firm. He is instrumental in creating the highly corrupt officials, politicians and businessmen and he began his operation to reach the top slot when he was made the deputy chief of planning commission under the then tricky premier Narosimha-rao who tactfully helped the right wing Hindu terrorists to pull down the Grand Babri Mosque and also pledged to rebuilt the Mosque, but kept silent about this till his ultimate death.
Manmohan is committed only those who brought hm to power.
Since he is the prime cause of rampant corruption in India which mother India dutifully tolerates Manmohan Singh cannot b expected to do away with it.
There is the strong opinion that India did not get freedom in 1947 but only the big industrialists, business class and rural kulaks (zamindars) that wanted to rule the nation through a puppet cabinet alone and obtained freedom to get rid of Britishers.
Since 1947, thus, the Nehru regime promoted nepotism and rampant corruption is small measure. He began employing special powers to promote corporate corruption and that led to the official corruption as well. When Manmohan took over the reign it was easy for him to promote corruption as a state policy.
Indian constitution has abundance of laws and clauses to stump corruption at the root. But the trend has only grown further in an alarming manner. All ruling and opposition parties have generously contributed t o make India one of top corruption nations of the globe.
In promoting rampant corruption in the nation by using the covers like terrorism, Pakistan and Islamic fundamentalism, etc, Indian parliament has, for decades now, disrespected the people who offered their deputies the necessary mandate in a democratic manner. The MPs by promoting their own private interests have insulted the parliament as the prime agency for democracy.
The well fed parliamentarians have no reason to feel the pain of an old man called Anna Hazare suffering without food for days now, fasting for completely arresting the trend of corruption in the country.
Can a regime change bring about a fundamental change in corruption standards? Given the nature of politics and political parties and politicians, no one believes that change in leadership or government itself indeed would result in better corruption free governance. India has had so many regimes in varying colors and new programs since 1947 but the process of corruption went hand in hand with parliamentary democratic process. MPs cannot exist without taking bribes for their services to people.
.>
-------------------------
It is ridiculous to expat Manmohan Singh, basically a bank employee releasing funds to ruling circles and their allies and without any link to populations and has not been elected by the people but nominated by the Congress party to Parliament cannot shield the ordinary populations. He has only learned whom to please and how to escape punishment. Manmohan shields all corrupt ministers, politicians and officials. One has no information about his assets. As such India cannot expect Manmohan to wind down corruption routes.
The Congress party , the major corruption agent in India has blamed the "troubles" in India by the new wave of protests to BJP, RSS and America. But Anna Hazare has rightly ridiculed the Congress regime for this funny remarks and said Congress party would, as the regime policy, blame Pakistan as well to save
its own skin .
As the Anna's popular movement became severe for the regime, India employed the usual terror gimmick operations in Occupied Kashmir, killing Muslims and a couple of post-paid state terrorists who get rewards even posthumously for the their sense of patriotism, while Kashmiri Muslims are called terrorists and are forgotten. Howeve4r, the ready-made conflict in Kashmir has not pacified the movement and leaders.
(To continue)
