India fears for Afghanistan after NATO withdrawal

muzammilkhan

New Member
4379331221_9d72eddc32.jpg


WASHINGTON: India called on Wednesday for greater coordination with the United States (US) on Afghanistan, voicing fear that extremists would gain strength once Western forces pull out.


NATO leaders in a May 21 summit in Chicago committed to pulling combat troops out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014 as Western nations grow tired of more than a decade of war and pessimistic on the chances of further progress.

India is one of the most vocal supporters of continued engagement and has given Afghanistan more than $2 billion since the US-led invasion in 2001 overthrew the Taliban regime, which sheltered virulently anti-Indian militants.

Ahead of high-level annual talks between India and the United States on June 13, Nirupama Rao, New Delhi’s ambassador to Washington, said the two nations have been holding talks on building ‘a stable, democratic and prosperous Afghanistan’.

“These consultations must be strengthened,” Rao said at the Atlantic Council, a think tank.

“Given the history of the last few decades in Afghanistan and the tide of extremism and radicalism that had swept across that country to the great detriment of its men, women and children, one cannot but help be concerned about what the future holds for that country after the NATO pullout,” she said.

India’s involvement in Afghanistan has enraged neighbouring Pakistan. The US partnered with Pakistan after the September 11, 2001 attacks. But relations have plummeted, with US concerns about Pakistan’s orientation soaring after US forces found and killed Osama bin Laden near the country’s main military academy last year.

The US has welcomed India’s contributions in Afghanistan but some US policymakers believe that Pakistani intelligence has maintained links to extremists due to a fixation on New Delhi’s influence.

Yashwant Sinha, a lawmaker from India’s main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party, was blunter about fears on Afghanistan during a separate appearance in Washington at the Brookings Institution.

Sinha said Afghanistan lacked a sufficient military - or an anti-Taliban force, such as the Northern Alliance which enjoyed Indian, Iranian and Russian support before the war - to withstand an assault.

“NATO has to stay the course in Afghanistan until we are absolutely confident that the Afghan army and the armed forces of Afghanistan are in a position to meet the Taliban threat,” said Sinha, who served as foreign and finance minister when his right-leaning party was in power from 1998 to 2004.

But opinion polls show that a majority of Americans want to end their country’s longest war, with many US policymakers concluding that it is unrealistic to eliminate the Taliban through force. US President Barack Obama and other Western leaders have vowed to support Afghanistan through military training and other assistance after the pullout of combat troops.

Indian Foreign Minister SM Krishna will travel to Washington for the June 13 annual dialogue. India and the US recently had a rift as Washington urged the import-dependent emerging economy to cut oil imports from Iran as a way to pressure Tehran over its contested nuclear programme.

Despite initial unease, India has reduced Iranian imports. The US is expected to announce in the coming weeks that it will exempt New Delhi from sanctions under a new law that punishes countries that do business with Iran. afp
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tz00007

Minister (2k+ posts)
india should fear for itself...lol

they must be the most dumb nation on earth of they decide to play a role in afghanistan...

they dont know that afghanis would hate them more than americans or russians...
 

crankthskunk

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
I have written for months, India's number is next. They cannot assume that because Karzai is their puppet, they can control Afghanistan once Americans gone. If America and USSR couldn't, what chances India has?